This session was the keynote speech for the
business track - I decided to attend it on a whim, and am glad I did, as I
found it to be excellent.
The speaker was Mark Horstman, ex-military
management consultant and co-founder of http://www.manager-tools.com/.
Introducing himself as being someone who is "really good at something that
you suck at," Mark's shorter title for the speech was "Do this
stuff" - as he explained, he wasn't so much going to wax lyrical about
management in general as much as he was going to give us all specific
instructions. This is something that he does on a regular basis; his site hosts
a series of freely available podcasts that he's recorded with his co-founder
Mike, from topics like "how to have an open door policy" to "how
to answer questions in a presentation." Chucking us some of the
low-hanging fruit - for example, scheduling fixed-length timeslots for checking
your email will stop you from losing entire days to it - Mark led up to a
discussion of delegation.
A person's job within an organisation is
comprised of a set of responsibilities - some of them are big responsibilities,
of which we only tend to have a few, and the rest are small responsibilities.
Little tasks that need to be done but aren't really a core part of your job.
When your manager hands you another one of the big responsibilities, you have
to make room for it by delegating some of the little things to your
"directs" (people who you are directly responsible for). Giving
people your work is the best way to train them to do your job - it's not
something they get from weekend getaways climbing trees and playing paintball
to "bond as a team" - and what seems like a small responsibility to
you is a big responsibility to them.
Good management is invisible - nobody likes
working for a manager who is constantly running from crisis to crisis,
interfering with everything. To maximize the effectiveness of the company, it's
necessary to maximize the effectiveness of each employee's behaviour - and
that's not something that you as a manager can directly control. The employee
is the only one who can control their behaviour. As a manager, it thus becomes
your job to encourage effective behaviour. Mark's "management
trinity" of techniques for doing this is comprised of
"one-on-ones," "feedback," and "coaching." (He
warned us up-front that he wouldn't have time to talk about coaching).
"One-on-ones" refers to
one-on-one meetings with each of your directs - that is, meeting with each of
them individually. Just a half hour, every week if possible - and it should be
scheduled well in advance and rarely missed, a proper fixture of work
procedure. The focus of this meeting is the employee - not you, not your work,
not your issues, and not just a transfer of what you've been given by your own
bosses. Expect to spend about 10 minutes talking about their concerns - or more
likely, listening - then 10 minutes talking about your concerns with regards to
them, then 10 minutes talking about the future (specifically, of the team and
their role within it). Don't check email during it, don't answer the phone,
don't suddenly rush out for a restroom break - dedicate the time to them. It
may seem like a lot, but you'll find that if you actively give people more of
your time, then they will demand less later on. Take notes, and follow up on
any action items religiously - if your people see that you're giving them a
channel through which things really can be changed, they'll really use it;
conversely, if you don't follow through, they'll just see the meetings as
another waste of time.
"Feedback" refers to the simple
action of telling one of your staff when they've done something right or wrong.
It's a fairly simple principle - if they don't know how things are working out,
then they don't know whether to keep doing what they're doing or to change
things around. Positive feedback is just as important as negative feedback -
most people's immediate response to "Can I have a word?" is "Am
I in trouble?" and if that happens then you're not giving enough positive
feedback. Lots of people are afraid to give negative feedback because they
don't want to "hurt feelings" - but your employees are adults and they
can take it. If they can't then you probably don't want them working for you
anyway. (Mark said that firing someone indicates you have failed as a manager
because you have failed to correct their behaviour - I think he needed to add
that alternatively you might have hired the wrong person to start with).
Some practical points were given. Instead
of simply walking up to your people and spouting at them, ask first -
"Hey, can I give you some feedback?" - it ensures that you have their
attention, ensures that they're ready to listen, and makes them feel in control
of the situation. If they say no, then deal with it. Maybe they're having a bad
day and it would be better if you left it until tomorrow.
Once they're listening, start by describing
the behaviour you want to change or reinforce ("When you do XYZ...") -
don't try to guess at their motivation or their intentions, and don't talk about
attitude, because those are things that you can't truly know. Then describe the
impact of that behaviour ("...such-and-such happens"). Finally, round
it off by discussing future behaviour (might simply be "keep it up!").
Approaching it in this way keeps you seeming reasonable and open to discussing
things, rather than laying down the law, and so people are much happier to take
your feedback on board. |