Home » Community » Forums » » SIGGRAPH 2003 Report
  Intel sponsors gamedev.net search:   
[Control Panel] [Register] [Bookmarks] [Who's Online] [Active Topics] [Stats] [FAQ] [Search]

Add Forum to Favorites |  Send Topic To a Friend | View Forum FAQ | Track this topic


 Last Thread Next Thread 
 SIGGRAPH 2003 Report
Post Reply 
Thanx for that article. Is is possible to get papers of topics discussed at SIGGRAPH? I am interessted in the fire, smoke, cloud and plant modeling stuff. Maybe you have some tips?

Best regards

Dirk

 User Rating: 1114   |  Rate This User  Send Private MessageView Profile Report this Post to a Moderator | Link

quote:
Original post by DonDickieD
Thanx for that article. Is is possible to get papers of topics discussed at SIGGRAPH? I am interessted in the fire, smoke, cloud and plant modeling stuff. Maybe you have some tips?

Best regards

Dirk


You can get the papers presented at SIGGRAPH here:
http://www.cs.brown.edu/people/tor/sig2003.html

You can also find a short of review of some of the SIGGRAPH papers on flipcode.com:
http://www.flipcode.com/misc/siggraph2003.shtml

The smoke screenshot is part of a research paper done by Fedkiw, Jensen, and Stam, and it was originally presented at SIGGRAPH 2001. The fire simulation was presented at the 2002 show. You can get both papers on Fedkiw's website:
http://graphics.stanford.edu/~fedkiw/

[edited by - Intruger on August 15, 2003 4:59:37 PM]

 User Rating: 1038   |  Rate This User  Send Private MessageView Profile Report this Post to a Moderator | Link

I dont agree on the statement that sa soon as GLSlang is in the core we have opengl 2.0. Opengl2.0 is more than the objectbuffers and the GLSlang. It proposed for example an asyncron datatransfer for textures ( so that you still could have an smooth animation during huge texture uploads ), A programmable pixeltransfer (pack and unpack processors) part of it is in the fragment specification, but not all. Moving all data to 'objects' instead of the jungel of glGen* that we have now.

My guess is still that we never will se an opengl2.0 as 3dlabs proposal, but a number of functions picked from it, and modified a bit. Some things will be thrown away and some other will come instead.. I dont think they call it 2.0 until atleast superbuffers, glslang and some async loadning scheme is in place.


 User Rating: 1015   |  Rate This User  Send Private MessageView Profile Report this Post to a Moderator | Link

quote:
Original post by MazyNoc
I dont agree on the statement that sa soon as GLSlang is in the core we have opengl 2.0.
Perhaps, but that's what members of the ARB were saying. Presumably with the assumption that in the timeframe that it's going to take to finalize GLSlang, the other things you mentioned will move closer to completion as well.

Really, OpenGL 2.0 is a marketing thing. Even if it doesn't exactly fit the original 3DLabs vision, the addition of GLSlang, superbuffers, etc., represent major changes to the API, justifying a full increment of the version number.

 User Rating: 2088   |  Rate This User  Send Private MessageView ProfileView Journal Report this Post to a Moderator | Link

All times are ET (US)

Post Reply
 Last Thread Next Thread 
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not edit your posts
You may not use HTML in your posts
Jump To:
Administrative Options: