Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


#ActualDrMadolite

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:31 AM

I've heard some say that the T34 was the best tank of the war...


Yes, that was my point. Posted Image

#8DrMadolite

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:29 AM

I've heard some say that the T34 was the best tank of the war...


Yes, that was my point. Posted Image

#7DrMadolite

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:29 AM

I've heard some say that the T34 was the best tank of the war...


Yes, that was my point. Posted Image

#6DrMadolite

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:27 AM

I've heard some say that the T34 was the best tank of the war...


Yes, that was my point. Posted Image

#5DrMadolite

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:26 AM

I've heard some say that the T34 was the best tank of the war...


Yes, that was sort of my point.

#4DrMadolite

Posted 06 August 2012 - 06:22 AM

I've heard some say that the T34 was the best tank of the war, fielded by any power, so I'm not getting where the "crappy" idea is coming from.


Maybe, if you actually bothered to considered the message in it's entirety rather than just being fixed on a single statement and taking it completely out of context so that you can have something to argue about, then you'd understand what I meant.

T34 was "crappy" in the same way an AK-47 is "crappy", or a Vespa is "crappy". It's crude and simple, and yet it's also considered the best tank ever designed. Just as the AK-47 is considered the best firearm and the Vespa is arguably the best vehicle ever designed. The point being that simple > complex, in many cases.

So could we please stay on topic now and not derail it into something completely irrelevant just so we can feel good about our trolling skills? Thanks.

PARTNERS