Show differencesHistory of post edits
#Actualeppo
Posted 10 August 2012 - 07:07 AM
Working with UCHAR data in the [0, 255] range isn't the most intuitive way of working with color values. It might be more practical (though more memory consuming) to interface with normalized [0.0f, 1.0f] floating point data. Not to mention applying series of operations (blending etc.) on low-range data can cause severe artifacting.
#1eppo
Posted 10 August 2012 - 07:00 AM
Working with UCHAR data in the [0, 255] range isn't the most intuitive way of working with color values. It might be more practical (though more memory consuming) to interface with normalized [0.0f, 1.0f] floating point data.