Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


#Actualszecs

Posted 07 October 2012 - 12:19 AM


I don't think talking about conciousness is relevant. Anything that looks like it has conciousness is enough. I can only be sure about my conciousness. I think the Duck test applies here well.

Alan Turing was many things (genius, spy, homosexual), but I think nobody would call him a duck.


Ahh. teh illiterateness of me.
Anyhoo, I didn't call him a duck, I called the computer a duck. Even Wiki has an article about this whole conciousness, can we forget the question of "can machines think" thing already?

#1szecs

Posted 07 October 2012 - 12:13 AM


I don't think talking about conciousness is relevant. Anything that looks like it has conciousness is enough. I can only be sure about my conciousness. I think the Duck test applies here well.

Alan Turing was many things (genius, spy, homosexual), but I think nobody would call him a duck.


Ahh. teh illiterateness of me.
Anyhoo, I didn't call him a duck, I called the computer a duck.

PARTNERS