Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


#ActualOlof Hedman

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:28 AM

C'mon guys! With their architecture you get 800MHz * 64 cores which gives you a total of 51.2 GHz!!!! That's wayyyyy more than the puny 16 GHz you get from a GPU!

If that doesn't sell you on their tech, then this mind-blowing performance benchmark is sure to do the trick.


I'd like to see a comparison with a GPU implementation instead of a CPU implementation. Of course it's a lot faster then the CPU. Though it was actually less lightning fast then I'd expect. But then again, just 2W :)
I don't doubt their tech is cool and useful, but it's rarely fair to compare cores and "GHz" across different architecture types.

#1Olof Hedman

Posted 26 November 2012 - 05:26 AM

C'mon guys! With their architecture you get 800MHz * 64 cores which gives you a total of 51.2 GHz!!!! That's wayyyyy more than the puny 16 GHz you get from a GPU!

If that doesn't sell you on their tech, then this mind-blowing performance benchmark is sure to do the trick.


I'd like to see a comparison with a GPU implementation instead of a CPU implementation. Of course it's a lot faster then the CPU.
I don't doubt their tech is cool and useful, but it's rarely fair to compare cores and "GHz" across different architecture types.

PARTNERS