Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


#ActualCornstalks

Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:43 PM

I sometime do the same thing, but without "for". I consider this a bit safer approach as it doesn't hit you so bad when you forget the break:

{
  // stuff
  int result = whatever;
  if (result == x)
	// other stuff
}

Am I missing something? Because the way I read that, there's no looping, and if there's no looping, it's purpose is entirely different than the looping version, in which case you don't do the same thing...

#1Cornstalks

Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:43 PM

I sometime do the same thing, but without "for". I consider this a bit safer approach as it doesn't hit you so bad when you forget the break:

{
  // stuff
  int result = whatever;
  if (result == x)
	// other stuff
}

Am I missing something? Because the way I read that, there's no looping, and if there's no looping, it's purpose is entirely different than the looping version...

PARTNERS