Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Awesome job so far everyone! Please give us your feedback on how our article efforts are going. We still need more finished articles for our May contest theme: Remake the Classics

#ActualNightCreature83

Posted 07 December 2012 - 03:17 AM

Why aren't you just using
int array[3][4][5][6];
//or
std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< /*your Type*/ > > > > array;

Using a naked C++ array is usually bad for this and even if you have to if you use only one array you end up with a uniform grid like array only, jagged arrays wouldn't be possible you would need to use a "type****" for that and the just looks ugly.

#3NightCreature83

Posted 07 December 2012 - 03:14 AM

Why aren't you just using
int array[3][4][5][6];
//or
std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< /*your Type*/ > > > > array;

#2NightCreature83

Posted 07 December 2012 - 03:14 AM

Why aren't you just using
[code=auto:0]
int array[3][4][5][6];
//or
std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< /*your Type*/ > > > > array;
[\code]

#1NightCreature83

Posted 07 December 2012 - 03:14 AM

Why aren't you just using
int array[3][4][5][6];
//or
std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< std::vector< /*your Type*/ > > > > array;

PARTNERS