Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

We're offering banner ads on our site from just $5!

1. Details HERE. 2. GDNet+ Subscriptions HERE. 3. Ad upload HERE.


#Actualkubera

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:32 AM

  • It possible, that ps.1.4 should be replaced with ps_1_4.
  • Your texld has not any sampler bound.
    (s# as the third parameter of texld)
  • I did not find any output register.
Maybe these things are right, but I am not sure.
This is a very legacy technology.

#7kubera

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:32 AM

  • It possible, that ps.1.4 should be replace with ps_1_4.
  • Your texld has not any sampler bound.
    (s# as the third parameter of texld)
  • I did not find any output register.

Maybe these things are right, but I am not sure.
This is a very legacy technology.

#6kubera

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:32 AM

  • It possible, that ps.1.4 should be replace with ps_1_4.
  • Your texld has not any sampler bound.
    (s# as the third parameter of texld)
  • I did not find any output register.

Maybe these things are right, but I am not sure.
This is a very legacy technology.

#5kubera

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:26 AM

  • It possible, that ps.1.4 should be ps_1_4.
  • Your texld have not any sampler bound.
    (s# as the third parameter of texld)
  • I did not find any output register.
Maybe these things are right, but I am not sure.
This is a very legacy technology.

#4kubera

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:21 AM

  • It possible, that ps.1.4 should be ps_1_4.
  • Your texld have not any sampler bound.
    (s# as the third parameter of texld)
  • I did not find any output register.

 

Maybe these things are right, but I am not sure.
This a very legacy technology.


#3kubera

Posted 23 December 2012 - 05:20 AM

It possible, that ps.1.4 should be ps_1_4.

Your texld have not any sampler bound.
(s# as the third parameter of texld)

I did not find any output register.

Maybe these things are right, but I am not sure.
This a very legacy technology.

PARTNERS