Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


#Actualjwezorek

Posted 23 February 2013 - 01:03 PM

I haven't reviewed the code but am not seeing a reason why a hash table would need an interface any different than the standard interface of std::unordered_x regardless of its implementation, i.e. chaining vs. buckets. I would expect any library that is part of boost to use the std interface where one exists, if possible.


#1jwezorek

Posted 23 February 2013 - 10:30 AM

I haven't reviewed the code but am not seeing a reason why a hash table implementation would need an interface any different than the standard interface of std::unordered_x regardless of its implementation, i.e. chaining vs. buckets. I would expect any library that is part of boost to use the std interface where one exists, if possible.


PARTNERS