Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

#ActualGaiiden

Posted 16 April 2013 - 07:19 PM

True, I asked you to remove the message from the newer articles because I got an email from a reader who had some suggested changes to the article. In the case of old content that would be my job to fix, but in the case of the newer content authors now have the ability to go in and edit things themselves, so I asked you to put in a flag to take that notice off any articles marked "Under Review" or "Peer Reviewed" so people would comment to the authors to make changes. But we still need them over the old articles and I know I went and checked and saw that they were back last time I looked.

 

P.S. - I'll get to that article Cornstalks linked to at some point today

 

Edit: Article is now fixed up


#1Gaiiden

Posted 16 April 2013 - 01:13 PM

True, I asked you to remove the message from the newer articles because I got an email from a reader who had some suggested changes to the article. In the case of old content that would be my job to fix, but in the case of the newer content authors now have the ability to go in and edit things themselves, so I asked you to put in a flag to take that notice off any articles marked "Under Review" or "Peer Reviewed" so people would comment to the authors to make changes. But we still need them over the old articles and I know I went and checked and saw that they were back last time I looked.

 

P.S. - I'll get to that article Cornstalks linked to at some point today


PARTNERS