Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Interested in a FREE copy of HTML5 game maker Construct 2?

We'll be giving away three Personal Edition licences in next Tuesday's GDNet Direct email newsletter!

Sign up from the right-hand sidebar on our homepage and read Tuesday's newsletter for details!


We're also offering banner ads on our site from just $5! 1. Details HERE. 2. GDNet+ Subscriptions HERE. 3. Ad upload HERE.


#ActualQNAN

Posted 30 June 2013 - 08:12 PM

Im working on instancing and would like to allow the instancing area (the area holding all instances) to change LoD, if the player moves closer/further away.

 

Since alpha blending is a no-go with instancing as it is impossible to sort render order with them, I have experimented with alpha testing and dissolvemap.

 

My problem so far is, that the dissolving matches up pretty bad across the fading time. Last test I tried with this calculation on the shader:

l_final_color.a = l_original_alpha * saturate(g_alpha * (0.5f + tex2D(g_dissolvemap_sampler, a_texcoord0).r))
 

g_alpha is the fading over time (will be 0.1 at 10% of the time etc). The dissolvemap, which is a noisemap with values distributed across the 0-1 spectrum. Alpha test will succeed when value is above 0.5.

I offset it with 0.5 to get the median values to fade in at around 0.5. If I do not use this offset, the first values (those that are 1.0 on the dissolvemap) will first start trickling in at 0.5. By offsetting it, I can get them to fade in at 0.333~. Which is also quite late...

 

To close the 0.333~ gap, I offset the g_alpha by 0.333~ from the main program, while scaling the timing by 0.666~, effectively removing the start gap while keeping the timing intact.

 

Anyway, the fading kinda works, but the bulk of the fading takes place in a too short time span. I have watched it up-close and it does fade over the entire time, but the beginning kinda trickles in and is not noticable from afar, and similar with the ending, making both beginning and ending not noticable. The result is a fast fade, that looks too much like a pop.

 

So my questions are:

- Is it possible to make a better distribution equation for the final color? (I have tried with exponentials but couldn't arrive at anything satisfactory)

- Can the problem be the dissolvemap? (IMO it looks fairly evenly distributed, I attached it (original is in .bmp, I saved as .jpg to save space here)

 

Is there alternatives to this approach?


#1QNAN

Posted 30 June 2013 - 08:08 PM

Im working on instancing and would like to allow the instancing area (the area holding all instances) to change LoD, if the player moves closer/further away.

 

Since alpha blending is a no-go with instancing as it is impossible to sort render order with them, I have experimented with alpha testing and dissolvemap.

 

My problem so far is, that the dissolving matches up pretty bad across the fading time. Last test I tried with this calculation on the shader:

l_final_color.a = l_original_alpha * saturate(g_alpha * (0.5f + tex2D(g_dissolvemap_sampler, a_texcoord0).r))
 

g_alpha is the fading over time (will be 0.1 at 10% of the time etc). The dissolvemap, which is a noisemap with values distributed across the 0-1 spectrum. Alpha test will succeed when value is above 0.5.

I offset it with 0.5 to get the median values to fade in at around 0.5. If I do not use this offset, the first values (those that are 1.0 on the dissolvemap) will first start trickling in at 0.5. By offsetting it, I can get them to fade in at 0.333~. Which is also quite late...

 

To close the 0.333~ gap, I offset the g_alpha by 0.333~ from the main program, while scaling the timing by 0.666~, effectively removing the start gap while keeping the timing intact.

 

Anyway, the fading kinda works, but the bulk of the fading takes place in a too short time span. I have watched it up-close and it does fade over the entire time, but the beginning kinda trickles in and is not noticable from afar, and similar with the ending, making both beginning and ending not noticable. The result is a fast fade, that looks too much like a pop.

 

So my questions are:

- Is it possible to make a better distribution equation for the final color? (I have tried with exponentials but couldn't arrive at anything satisfactory)

- Can the problem be the dissolvemap? (IMO it looks fairly evenly distributed, I attached it (original is in .bmp, I saved as .jpg to save space here)

 

Is there alternatives to this approach?


PARTNERS