Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Banner advertising on our site currently available from just $5!


1. Learn about the promo. 2. Sign up for GDNet+. 3. Set up your advert!


#Actualsavail

Posted 03 July 2013 - 08:57 AM

This idea about using object's memory address is just brilliant! Though I'm afraid I'm still not pro enough to implement it tongue.png but I would like to find out sth more about this if you don't mind ^^.

I'm not sure how could it work? The server would create an object on its side and would send it to client together with its memory address? Then client would have to create the object in the same memory location, as it had been created on the server, using sth like http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/placement-new.html? But do I have certainty that the memory address which was free on the server will be free on the client as well? Or maybe I'm completely wrong with my assumptions?tongue.png


#1savail

Posted 03 July 2013 - 08:56 AM

This idea about using object's memory address is just brilliant! Though I'm afraid I'm still not pro enough to implement it :P but I would like to find out sth more about this if you don't mind ^^.

I'm not sure how could it work? The server would create an object on his side and would send it to client together with its memory address? Then client would have to create the object in the same memory location, as it had been created on the server, using sth like http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/placement-new.html? But do I have certainty that the memory address which was free on the server will be free on the client as well? Or maybe I'm completely wrong with my assumptions?:P


PARTNERS