• Create Account

### #Actualjohnmarinelli

Posted 03 August 2013 - 12:59 PM

Hello everyone,

I'm working on a little exercise program that takes a matrix and a vector and performs algebra on them.

I'm using templates for both my 4x4 matrix class and my vector4 class.

My matrix4x4 class serves as a parent to specific types of matrices, like a translation matrix.

The program gives me an error when I instantiate a matrix4x4 class with no parameters and try to operate on it, even though I fill the values of the object in an empty constructor:

vector4<T> translateVector(const matrix4x4<T> matrix, const vector4<T> vector)
{
matrix4x4<T> tempMatrix();

for (int row = 0; row < MAX_LENGTH; ++row)
{
for (int column = 0; column < MAX_LENGTH; ++column)
{
tempMatrix[row][column] = (matrix[row][column] * vector[row]);  //I get errors on this line and the one below
newVector[row] += tempMatrix[row][column];
}
}
}

//in matrix4x4.h:

template <typename T>
class matrix4x4
{
public:
T values[MAX_LENGTH][MAX_LENGTH];

matrix4x4() //when using this ctor, the compiler tells me I need to have a pointer to complete object type
{
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_LENGTH; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < MAX_LENGTH; j++)
{
values[i][j] = 0;
}
}
};

T* operator[](int index)
{
assert (index > -1 && index < MAX_LENGTH);
return values[index];
};



However, I fixed the problem by simply adding this ctor to the matrix4x4 class:

matrix4x4(T x) //this does exactly the same thing as empty ctor, just has a parameter
{
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_LENGTH; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < MAX_LENGTH; j++)
{
values[i][j] = 0;
}
}
};


I feel like this is a bad patch to a larger problem I should address, but I'm not sure what that problem is or how to fix it.

Is it just a part of C++ to consider a templated object with an empty ctor to be "incomplete"?

### #1johnmarinelli

Posted 03 August 2013 - 12:50 PM

Hello everyone,

I'm working on a little exercise program that takes a matrix and a vector and multiplies them.

I'm using templates for both my 4x4 matrix class and my vector4 class.

My matrix4x4 class serves as a parent to specific types of matrices, like a translation matrix.

The program gives me an error when I instantiate a matrix4x4 class with no parameters and try to operate on it, even though I fill the values of the object in an empty constructor:

vector4<T> translateVector(const matrix4x4<T> matrix, const vector4<T> vector)
{
matrix4x4<T> tempMatrix();

for (int row = 0; row < MAX_LENGTH; ++row)
{
for (int column = 0; column < MAX_LENGTH; ++column)
{
tempMatrix[row][column] = (matrix[row][column] * vector[row]);  //I get errors on this line and the one below
newVector[row] += tempMatrix[row][column];
}
}
}

//in matrix4x4.h:

template <typename T>
class matrix4x4
{
public:
T values[MAX_LENGTH][MAX_LENGTH];

matrix4x4() //when using this ctor, the compiler tells me I need to have a pointer to complete object type
{
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_LENGTH; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < MAX_LENGTH; j++)
{
values[i][j] = 0;
}
}
};

T* operator[](int index)
{
assert (index > -1 && index < MAX_LENGTH);
return values[index];
};



However, I fixed the problem by simply adding this ctor to the matrix4x4 class:

matrix4x4(T x) //this does exactly the same thing as empty ctor, just has a parameter
{
for (int i = 0; i < MAX_LENGTH; i++)
{
for (int j = 0; j < MAX_LENGTH; j++)
{
values[i][j] = 0;
}
}
};


I feel like this is a bad patch to a larger problem I should address, but I'm not sure what that problem is or how to fix it.

Is it just a part of C++ to consider a templated object with an empty ctor to be "incomplete"?

PARTNERS