Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

#ActualProgrammerDX

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:15 AM

Afaik you can't tell the difference between a pointer and a reference once you debug the machine code in an assembler. Both are 'pointers' in there.

References are more like a compile-time pointer that disallow referring to invalid objects (ie NULL).

#3ProgrammerDX

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:15 AM

Afaik you can't tell the difference between a pointer and a reference once you debug the machine code in an assembler. Both are 'pointers' in there.

References are more like a compile-time pointer that disallow refering to invalid objects (ie NULL).

#2ProgrammerDX

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:15 AM

Afaik you can't tell the difference between a pointer and a reference once you debug the machine code in an assembler. Both are 'pointers' in there.

References are more like a compile-time pointer that disallows references to invalid objects (ie NULL).

#1ProgrammerDX

Posted 18 September 2013 - 06:14 AM

Afaik you can't tell the difference between a pointer and a reference once you debug the machine code in an assembler. Both are 'pointers' in there. References is more like a compile-time pointer that disallows references to invalid objects (ie NULL).

PARTNERS