Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Calling all IT Pros from Canada and Australia.. we need your help! Support our site by taking a quick sponsored surveyand win a chance at a $50 Amazon gift card. Click here to get started!


#Actualsamoth

Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:10 AM

Since the view matrix is always orthonormal (or nearly so), can't you just use the transpose of the 3x3 part and do the translational part "by hand"? That's waaaaaaaay easier than doing an inverse.


#1samoth

Posted 24 September 2013 - 09:08 AM

Since the view matrix is always orthonormal (only rotation and translation info), can't you just use the transpose? That's waaaaaaaay easier than doing an inverse.


PARTNERS