• Create Account

Need scary sound effects or creepy audio loops for your next horror-themed game? Check out Highscore Vol.3 - The Horror Edition in our marketplace. 50 sounds and 10 loops for only $9.99! ### Categories (See All) This article is under review by the community - Current moderation totals: Mark as peer reviewed: 2 votes (Gaiiden, incertia) Still needs work: 1 votes (Dave Hunt) Editor Feedback: • Unclear or Incomplete Like 7Likes Dislike # Pre-Visualization Is Important! UNDER REVIEW By superman3275 | Published Mar 17 2013 10:09 AM in General Programming program organization design visualization planning beginner Hello everyone. This post should be pretty long (and heavy). I feel that this mistake is being caused largely by the more seasoned developers on here using the wrong words to describe how to pre-visualize. This led to me making a large amount of mistakes in software development and has made me scrap so much code. So, without further ado, I present to you: The Importance Of Pre-Visualization Many a beginner on gamedev.net (including me) has trouble with their software in the beginning. I had no idea how to plan for projects or what was even included in projects. I would look for posts about how to plan out projects. Generally when these questions get ask the seasoned developers on here (Also known as people who have worked on many finished projects) answer with responses like: I have a really iterative design I don't really pre-visualize, I try to sort out more details at implementation Now, that's not to say these developers are in the wrong at all. For a beginner however, these terms can be very daunting and confusing. For me, I thought I shouldn't really pre-visualize at all and that everything would sort itself out eventually (Boy how wrong was I). In this article I plan to explain to you how I pre-visualize my projects, how much you should really be pre-visualizing, and why it's important. So let's jump right in with the third one: Why Pre-Visualizing Important? Pre-Visualizing allows you to plan how your classes interact. Imagine this: In many projects, your Collision and Physics interact, and almost all of your classes have to access a singular Map for the level you're on. How they will interact and how the map will be handled must be thought out so that the code you write at the beginning will be prepared for how the other classes use the Map. This must be sorted out in pre-visualization because you write certain code (classes) at different times, which means if you don't think about this you'll end up re-writing enormous amounts of code. Pre-Visualization also defines project scope. Knowing what you plan to accomplish and what accomplishing that includes helps with development (For one thing, you will be able to gauge your progress and define what needs to be done next). When making a Side-Scroller, understanding the scope of the enemies A.I. is important so you'll know the work involved. If you make simple A.I., you can compensate with adding bows to a Side-Scroller that was originally only going to have swords. Now that I've made that analogy however, let us move on to another important topic involving why pre-visualizing is important: Understanding the Mechanics of your game. This ties into project scope. The mechanics are part of project scope because the more complex the mechanics the more time it will take to implement them. Imagine this: Having a Bow involves a lot more coding (Handling projectiles shot, their collision, how fast they move, animation for them, etc.). So at project scope, you define if you'll have a bow or if you'll only have swords. This lets you only plan for swords. The first part of planning should always be defining your scope. Now on to the second part: How much you should be pre-visualizing. My general rule is figuring out your hierarchy and how your classes will interact, however I leave out the actual coding details. I know how to code, and a large part of my actual software-design is figuring out how to solve problems or thinking about the best way to solve a problem. Figuring out what those problems are and how you'll solve them is pre-visualization. Actually planning out my code, what my functions will pass in, etc. shouldn't be defined in pre-visualization (Except for small, single-task programs like converting one form of a linear equation to another form.). Solving these problems before you start coding make sure that all the code you right already had that problem in mind (So when a problem turns up or when you are implementing something, you don't have to scrap existing code). Some problems are bound to be encountered while coding, and trying to write down and fix every minute detail of your program is an example of bad pre-visualization. You can't anticipate everything, however anticipating what you can (AKA the bigger problems and ideas) will help exponentially. Now, what you've all been waiting for: How do I pre-visualize? It's simple really. I get a notebook, write down the name of my project. I define the scope, the mechanics, and then take one or two pages in the notebook I label "Classes". I figure out the basic classes and write down their responsibility (Defining responsibility make sure you understand what all of your classes are actually supposed to be doing). Then, I take maybe a page for each class or important mechanic and think about it hard. I think about how it'll handle it's responsibilities and how it will interact with other classes. The key word here is interaction. Interaction is a huge part of software design (Especially video game software design.). This allows me to anticipate the basic structure of my code and the problems I'll run into. Then for a day or two I'll read over what I have and reflect. After I do this, I take my journal to the computer and start coding. This whole process is one to two weeks. The main point of this article was to stress how important pre-visualization is to beginners. Now, it might just be tic-tac-toe, however still get in the habit of pre-visualizing. It'll pay off in the long run. If you enjoyed this article, please post down below. If you have any recommendation about how you plan or any corrections, feel free to share them with everyone. Cheers :)! ## License GDOL (Gamedev.net Open License) Comments Thank you for this, I have also seen responses like you mentioned, seasoned professionals saying that they figure it all out in their head as they go along. This is the approach I have been taking and for me 50% of the time it results in spaghetti code and I get really confused and frustrated about the overall design. My own students jump headfirst right into code because they want to get done. Skipping the design process (no matter which program design paradigm you use) can be a recipe for disaster on all levels.. for beginners because you don't yet know what you are doing, and for larger projects because eventually you will end up having to do a major refactor just to get your codebase to not suck. You began by bashing the gamedev community.... not even going to go further. Gotta love a teacher that says, everyone (people who arent me) suck so do what I tell you to cause I'm the$!!!

"I feel that this mistake is being caused largely by the more seasoned developers on here (Also known as, not me)"

You may want to reformulate this just for clarity, when I read it the first time it came off as "seasoned developers spread these mistakes - but not me" which I guess is the exact opposite of what you wanted to express.

I would like to see more work on this article. I am not a native English speaker, so excuse me if I am wrong, but for me some sentences do not sound right.

A bit of nitpicking:

- I suggest avoiding explanations in parentheses whenever possible. You don't need to add "." at the end if the sentence in parentheses. I think it is not even a separate sentence, so you don't need to start with capital letter either.

- More separation between paragraphs to emphasize the problem, solution, conclusion would be nice.

- You are changing conversation style a lot. Sometimes it is neutral "this article", sometimes it is reader "you", sometimes "you all", and then back to writer "I do this...".

And the way it "should be done" is the way "you do it". I suggest to keep explanation and the story of your learning process separate.

"I feel that this mistake is being caused largely by the more seasoned developers on here (Also known as, not me)"

You may want to reformulate this just for clarity, when I read it the first time it came off as "seasoned developers spread these mistakes - but not me" which I guess is the exact opposite of what you wanted to express.

Agreed.  I think it's okay to have some humility when discussing your level even if you are a beginner.   The author just needs to find better ways of saying it.

I meant to say that I'm not a senior developer . Guess it had the opposite effect.

You got a point with that article, but while reading I was for a large part wondering when the justifying ends and the content starts on showing how people could do it.

I would like to see more work on this article. I am not a native English speaker, so excuse me if I am wrong, but for me some sentences do not sound right.

A bit of nitpicking:

- I suggest avoiding explanations in parentheses whenever possible. You don't need to add "." at the end if the sentence in parentheses. I think it is not even a separate sentence, so you don't need to start with capital letter either.

- More separation between paragraphs to emphasize the problem, solution, conclusion would be nice.

- You are changing conversation style a lot. Sometimes it is neutral "this article", sometimes it is reader "you", sometimes "you all", and then back to writer "I do this...".

And the way it "should be done" is the way "you do it". I suggest to keep explanation and the story of your learning process separate.

I agree.

You've got some useful information in the article, but it takes a lot of work on the part of the reader to find it.

Note: Please offer only positive, constructive comments - we are looking to promote a positive atmosphere where collaboration is valued above all else.

PARTNERS