Based on ...,
Members - Reputation: 138
Posted 12 October 2000 - 07:22 AM
Members - Reputation: 263
Posted 12 October 2000 - 09:56 AM
Of course, theses are only ideas, for now.
Plus I want to avoid the gimmick thing. You know. You have this one cool creature, and you''d like so much to have it in a game that you design endless stuff around it so it take consistence. I don''t want that. so instead, I jsut store the initial idea, with all that it spawns. then i jsut leave it. For a long long while. And once in a while I browse through it, and see if it still looks so cool. Most of the time I am glad to say it does But still, more work could be done, so I just leave it.
I get this a lot when watching movies. I get this surge of putting the emotions I had into a more tangible way. So I end up drawing a lot, doing stuff ... and usually, since I am in computing, it ends up as a scenario, an idea for an interface, for some game mechanics, etc.
Ultimately, I''ll have some consistent thing I can actually work on.
Moderators - Reputation: 1892
Posted 12 October 2000 - 10:42 AM
It''s the main thrust of my effort to let players impact a dynamic, changing cosmos. I think that, and the multiplayer element, was the most fun.
Just waiting for the mothership...
Members - Reputation: 1432
Posted 12 October 2000 - 09:40 PM
Sometimes it''s a music and I create around it.
I wrote a scenario for a CRPG and played it as an Tabletop RPG, it was interesting since I have seen where my players were going.
Maybe I should have keep that secret, but I think that testing a CRPG as an RPG is pretty nice, and leads you to unexpected places and add some interesting gameplay.
-* So many things to do, so little time to spend. *-
Members - Reputation: 138
Posted 15 October 2000 - 06:45 AM
Members - Reputation: 288
Posted 15 October 2000 - 07:07 AM
There is some knowledge to be gleaned from this kind of comparison, but it''s use is limited. Keep in mind that your table-top players have way more commands they can execute than their computer counterparts.
GDNet+ - Reputation: 352
Posted 15 October 2000 - 05:16 PM
Unfortunately, my mechanics are very statistical. We''d have to crunch a lot of numbers to do just about anything. Computer mechanics almost never convert to P&P mechanics.
For example, back in junior high I designed a really simple system based on (take a guess) Final Fantasy. So, it was pretty much nothing but combat. I had a billion weapons, spells, and monsters, but nothing that inspired good role-playing. The whole project was doomed to failure from its onset. It wasn''t until playtime that I realized this.
That was many years ago. I''ve strayed far away from combat as a basis for role-playing. My friends and I call this "roll-playing," and I''m sure many other people have exploited this pun before us.
Now, onto the topic at hand...
Yes, many times have I drawn a picture or written a story and realized almost immediately that it would be a great element to a video game. Just the other day I drew a picture of a long-haired woman with an oriental sword, and the first thing I thought was, "she''s going to be the star of an action game."
But more often than this, I find myself writing stories based on background created for games. So, it''s the opposite of what you said: game first, drawings and writings second. In fact, I just recently wrote the introduction for a story that takes place on an alien world that a friend and I specifically designed for a CRPG. What''s even more shocking is that he wants to use this background for writing his own novels someday.
Game design-turned-book? Stranger things have happened.
Members - Reputation: 109
Posted 15 October 2000 - 06:05 PM
We can draw ideas from the Victorian architecture of a beautifully restored home we see in a movie or the application of forensic medicine we read about in a Patricia Cornwell suspense novel.
The key is to derive something cohesive and complete from the ephemereal visions in our mind. Bits of wonderfulness from here and there often don''t go together, and we find ourselves contriving a story that is nothing more than a melting pot of ideas.
Whatever it is we wish to share with others, simulate, and define, we must first understand. We must know it cold. The best authors spend a great deal of time researching their subject matter, and often live or work in the field they so effortlessly seem to write about.
So if you wish to expand on this picture, this poem, or this short story, ask yourself this: What do I know about this? What ideas will I really draw upon to flesh this concept out? Ultimately, you will draw upon what fascinates you, and you may deviate entirely from what the picture represented, or you may find yourself having writer''s block.
Everything seems to boil down to the details. The greatest ideas stop dead in their tracks because on closer inspection, you realize you don''t know the subject matter. The best stories are the ones that don''t tell the greater story, but unfold by way of the small personal events which sum to the greater.