Critique my catapult

Started by
12 comments, last by Professor420 17 years, 9 months ago
I myself didn't inspect the howstuffworks link, so I'll critique based on my knowledge the the various weapons books I have:

Mangonels (medieval) and Onagers (roman) usually had either a scoop or a sling as their head. The scoop was far easier to build, but the sling was better and more common (adding as much as a third to the distance). I can't find pictoral references to the head being a bowl, but they may be out there, and it doesn't really matter anyway, unless you're doing a sim.
Also, they came both wheeled and staked to the ground. If the artillery was defensive, it'd probably be staked so there was less recoil (and less strain on the pieces, less repositioning, etc).
They were powered by a wound skein, probably made of sinew. It would be threaded around the catapult arm, and wound by two winches at the base of the arm, until it was ridiculously tight. An additional winch would be at the rear of the catapult, and would be wound to bring the arm down to loading position (and put the arm under even more tension).
The projectile would be loaded, and the trigger pulled, and the arm would come flying up, hit the cross-bar, send the rear wheels of the mangonel or onager into the air (hence the nickname of wild ass), and the projectile would be launched.

Here's a good site:
http://www.redstoneprojects.com/trebuchetstore/build_a_catapult.html
-------------www.robg3d.com
Advertisement
Thanks for the info! That site could come in handy.
___________________________________________________David OlsenIf I've helped you, please vote for PigeonGrape!
The normals look alot better now! It looks alot less 'chunky' now.

And, again, most people don't care as long as you have the general idea of what a catapult is doing. Though, it just seems to be that several of the people who *do* care reside in this forum. :D

I've never heard of trebuchets being used defensively, but balistas where. I believe that that was the primary use of balistas.

<offtopic>
Oh, and if any of you guys live in New Hampshire or near-by, I encourage you to check out the Yankee Siege trebuchet. It's a massive (40 foot tall, IIRC) trebuchet. The counter weight ways a over a thousand pounds (again, IIRC), and it throws big pumpkins hundreds of feet. It's highly impressive. It's website is here. It only runs during the fall when there are pumpkins to chuck.
All artillery played primarily a role as seige weapons. It was not common (or possible) for larger engines to be deployed in battle, though smaller versions certainly were.

Artillery also was far more important to an attack than defender. Seige weapons fired from inside a city could do relatively little damage to a force that has surrounded a city and fortified itself. On the other hand, seige weapons fired INTO a city wreak havoc, because anything they hit becomes a problem. So they were primarily offensive seige weapons.
Ballistae were just better forms of the Onager or catapult, they were designed as offensive or defensive. Ballistae could throw a projectile twice as far, and far more accurately, than a similarly sized onager.

I also agree you don't need such great historical accuracy, but there needs to be an effective way of the catapult working. Just some minor modification of adding a couple winches and rope-covered-bars is probably enough. The animation is fine.
-------------www.robg3d.com

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement