Quote:In reply to a post reply to a post that was itself a reply to a post which among many other things suggested that Mono is nowhere near being a credible solution. Promit said "This is just the part where I leave the thread, because the person I'm talking to is an idiot."
No. Not amongst many other things:
Quote:The entire contents of the post I'm referring toQuote:Original post by Conner McCloudQuote:Original post by Stachel
Mono is nowhere near being a credible solution.
Oh man, now you've really gone and pissed Promit off.
It happens. This is just the part where I leave the thread, because the person I'm talking to is an idiot.
Quote:
That's what I'm doing, is it?
Seeing as you're American, I assumed that English was your first language, so you were deliberatley misunderstanding me. If that isn't the case, I apologise.
Quote:
I'll give you the benifit of the doubt that you've only ommited #4
That's kind seeing as I'd have to have violated the laws of physics to take your 4th point into account.
Quote:I've already posted a direct example that could lead to the Tao framework being better suited for a given indie project than MDX.
The Arena Wars team switched to MDX - so they thought MDX had enough advantages over OpenGL to outweigh the cost of the switch. Hardly a recommendation - in fact I'd say it indicates the opposite of what you're trying to argue.