Avoiding the MMO end-game with generational advancement
Members - Reputation: 192
Posted 30 January 2009 - 02:19 AM
Members - Reputation: 554
Posted 30 January 2009 - 02:34 AM
Metal Geer Solid (the first one on Playstation) gave out special geer when you start a new game after completing it once. And the loot was different according to whether you saved the girl or not.
[Edited by - AngleWyrm on January 30, 2009 9:34:26 AM]
Members - Reputation: 122
Posted 30 January 2009 - 02:40 AM
In some games like MU you can reset your character...
when you are at MAXLEVEL you can start playing the game again from level 1 but a little more powerful at start...
You can reset N times... reaching a MAXRESET - MAXLEVEL...
Anyway i like your idea. It increases posibilities.
Members - Reputation: 540
Posted 30 January 2009 - 03:05 AM
anyways, that being said, Co* has virtually no lvl 50 content and expects you to make a new char once you hit max level with your new char getting nothing from a previous one getting to lvl 50 other than 2 epic classes being unlocked the first time...and it's pretty successful...so yeah...
Members - Reputation: 367
Posted 30 January 2009 - 06:13 AM
Of course the obvious solution is to put a limit on how powerful characters can get, in which case you aren't solving the problem but rather delaying the inevitable.
That's not to say the idea is completely without merit though.You're on the right track in giving players more incentive to create new characters and thus recycle content. The primary purpose of MMO design is to keep players p[l]aying for as long as possible after all.
On the other hand, as much as you want them to players don't really want to replay the same content. "Been there, done that" they say. Traditionally the approach to this problem has been to provide multiple paths the player can take to get to the higher levels. "Well, I have a maximum level elf, but I've never played a dwarf before."
The problem with this approach is that as the player progresses more of the world opens up to them, and the number of viable advancement locations -- dungeons of the correct level to put it another way -- he or she hasn't already visited tends to rapidly decrease. Near the maximum level the player tends to find that they've already seen everything and you risk losing their interest.
The solution up until now has been to add new content in these level ranges to keep things interesting, but doing so also removes the original incentive to start over, and the low level areas get forgotten.
With your idea you'll end up in much the same situation, where you have to add high level content to keep the progressively more powerful characters content, while the original low level starting areas get forgotten about as their offspring start becoming too powerful for them right at the start.
At least, that's how I see it. You're thinking in the right direction, but when it comes to MMO design the simplest things have to be considered very carefully because not only will players try to defeat the system, but the system can even defeat itself if not designed correctly.
Members - Reputation: 622
Posted 30 January 2009 - 07:00 AM
Original post by rakketh
Most MMOs I've played seem to be a race to get to the max level so that you can play the "real game". My idea is that instead of having this maximum level to strive for, you can create a new character that carries on some traits of the parent.
While the idea of generational 'families' could be interesting, I fail to see how your idea either eliminates a max-level or provides an alternative endgame. Instead of viewing it as an idea which somehow fundamentally changes an MMO (because I don't see how it does), I'll consider how generations could be used...
Generations could provide a tradeoff between power and endurance. Using the mechanism you talked about, offspring could provide you with more power, but age/level could provide you with more endurance. Each powerful descendent could shorten lifespan (or maximum endurance), such that players are challenged to make a tradeoff between power and endurance. --- Though I don't see why doing this as generations is important, instead of doing it through other means.
Generations could be an important part of a game in which characters have a maximum lifespan. This seems like a poor idea from the perspective of locking in players, as when their main dies, they could view it as lost investment. However, your idea to allow offspring which are based on the power of the main could provide continued investment value. I'm concerned about the method to determine lifespan, as both calendar day and play-time lifespans have serious issues.
Scenerios could be geared to require players of different ages. Players in their teenage years could wield more variety but less power; or players could gain power through age but also gain undesirable side-effects or unpredictability. This would create even more of a rat-race for endgamers, as they would not be able to permanently stay in fixed roles. Players would constantly be leveling new characters to fit into spaces that are voided, and raid teams would be constantly shifting capabilities. However, this sounds like something that could ultimately be more frustrating than satisfying for the player.
Members - Reputation: 192
Posted 30 January 2009 - 10:31 AM
I suppose I am moving this boundary to a different position in character development. Instead of having 1 char constantly getting that little bit better, you spawn a new char with the extra potential to get better, or with a different build so your game can vary that way also. Doing it this way opens up a new part of the game, which is a large focus of my overall game plan: having elder characters.
Elder characters become controllable NPCs that are added to your clan village - this would be either as an alt or in a more generic goal kind of way (comments?). Rather than having a bunch of developer-created NPCs that you have no connection to, your village is actually full of characters that you (and your clan-mates) have developed.
For example if your elder char is a healer, they could open a hospital where players can respawn for a fee. The better the healer the less of a debuf the death leaves, giving an incentive for friendly players to use your healer, and therefore giving your village more capital.
The game introduces a strategy to either breed early to give your village more NPCs, or less frequently to give it more knowledgable ones. For example one player may want to train their first character to a high skill level, compared to another player who breeds 5 generations in that time. The second player would have contributed more NPCs to his village, which would provide a different advantage to a village compared to the advantage of having a single strong character.
There would need to be a mechanic for a population control for elder characters. This could be an aging mechanism, perma-death whilst making the NPCs still playable, a combination of the two, or some other mechanism (insert ideas here).
I envisage this game is largely PvP, so the challenge is not a particular "dungeon" which would be repeated through each generation; instead "quests" would be based around player interactions so repetitive PvE content would become less of an issue.