Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Correct Lightmapping and Planar Mapping..


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
No replies to this topic

#1 phueppl1   Members   -  Reputation: 122

Like
Likes
Like

Posted 01 August 2001 - 05:43 PM

Hiho! I have a little Theory and I''d like to hear you opinions: Usually for lightmapping, one takes either the X, Y or Z plane and uses that to map the lightmap texture... that could produces some not 100 correct values.. now... wouldn''t it be possible to just rotate the rest of the world so that the current triangles normal is a base vektor? so that the triangle lies on a base plane? Then you could use the normal approach to calculate light values (Radiosity).. What do you guys think? Or is this already done ( I don''t think so)... thx! cya, Phil Visit Rarebyte! and no!, there are NO kangaroos in Austria (I got this questions a few times over in the states


Sponsor:



Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS