PerformanceTest1 FPS counts (PC)

Zachary Tarvit · 2011-01-24T21:46:32

Just out of curiosity, what were you guys' FPS counts for the PerformanceTest1 PC project (The one with Matrix m = Matrix.Identity; Vector3 v2; for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { m = Matrix.CreateRotationX(MathHelper.PiOver4); m *= Matrix.CreateTranslation(new Vector3(5.0f)); Vector3 v = m.Translation - Vector3.One; v2 = v + Vector3.One; } In it)? I got 30 FPS, and while playable - its still pretty bad.

Old Archive Archive

Started by TestSubject06 January 18, 2011 03:50 AM

12 comments, last by JSelf 13 years, 2 months ago

NEXUSKill

475

January 18, 2011 06:09 PM

Oh, for that matter I'll be running mostly in a single core, 2.6 ghz CPU with 1 Mb DDR2 RAM and a GForce 7300, with XP pro SP2. Got a better computer but I use that one just for gaming

Game making is godlike

LinkedIn profile: http://ar.linkedin.com/pub/andres-ricardo-chamarra/2a/28a/272

JSelf

102

January 19, 2011 05:29 AM

Empty, I hit about 14400. However, with the scary loop, I get around 27. Probably still better than Crysis Max'd out! :lol:

espp1234

100

January 24, 2011 09:28 PM

I'm 110% sure that this way of measuring performance is completely useless and inconclusive. Considering what's going on under the hood, a loop that iterates 100,000 times will definitely get JIT'ed away. JIT (Just-In-Time compilation) optimizes portions of your program that are hit many times, when the JIT kicks in and how much it improves are completely unpredictable. Also, this test only takes sequential CPU computation into consideration, no new objects are created per iteration so a computer with slow RAM performs just as well as a computer with super fast RAM, which is never the case in a real game. Also, the GPU is not benchmarked either, a 2ghz laptop running an integrated card will do just as well as a quad-core 2ghz with a state-of-the-art graphics card.