Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


We could live to be a 1000. No really, a scientist said so.


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
52 replies to this topic

#1 Alpha_ProgDes   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 4688

Posted 05 July 2011 - 04:54 PM

Methsulah will return in our lifetime. According to this article, the first person to live to 150 years old has already been born. And the person to live to 1000 year will be born in the next 20 years. As much as I'd like to think that Highlander could come true. I don't know how much bollocks this article really is. Also, if this was true then two things will happen: either the space race goes into OverDrive or some religious nuts kills this guy and anyone associated with him.
Beginner in Game Development? Read here.
 
Super Mario Bros clone tutorial written in XNA 4.0 [MonoGame, ANX, and MonoXNA] by Scott Haley
 
If you have found any of the posts helpful, please show your appreciation by clicking the up arrow on those posts Posted Image
 
Spoiler

Sponsor:

#2 ChurchSkiz   Members   -  Reputation: 444

Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:17 PM

It's a war between scientists with the cure for every ailment, and fat, lazy americans.

In all seriousness, I can definitely see longevity increasing drastically with the new Telomere research going on. Though I don't know what effect that has on muscles like your heart, liver, brain, etc.

#3 JoeCooper   Members   -  Reputation: 338

Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:23 PM

Hi uhh, this is a tad off-topic, but the bright red minus one on Church's post looks like it'd be embarrassing so I'll say it; I clicked that because I was mindlessly fidgeting with the mouse and forgot there's no undo on that. The post is actually fine. I up-voted a random other post by Church to even it out. Gonna close the browser now.

#4 Varine   Members   -  Reputation: 128

Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:42 PM

Yes. I am the one who will live to be 150. Then, I will be reborn and live to be a 1000. At which point I will be worshiped like a God! Or killed for witch-craft... it's pretty iffy, I could see it going either way.

#5 dpadam450   Members   -  Reputation: 889

Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:55 PM

Well different living things on earth all have different lifespans. I don't know what actually causes aging, but I'm sure people could live a lot longer than we are currently. I mean we develop in another human being out of our own cells (children), so theoretically the human body should be able to produce those new cells for itself and anti-age.

I have the news on in the background and they just said the life expectancy of women is going down.

#6 KanonBaum   Members   -  Reputation: 277

Posted 05 July 2011 - 09:35 PM

We'd all have crappy memory by our 700s. We'd all probably have Vuja De. "I've forgotten this before."
I'm that imaginary number in the parabola of life.

#7 Khaiy   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 1342

Posted 05 July 2011 - 09:42 PM

There's a big difference between someone living to 150 and that being a common thing.

Telomerase is cool, but whatever treatment they make from it is not going to be cheap for quite a while. Not to mention that we already aren't set up for people to live as long as they do, let alone twice as long.

#8 Sirisian   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 1731

Posted 06 July 2011 - 01:36 AM

Better test it on cats first. It would suck to outlive that many pets.

#9 way2lazy2care   Members   -  Reputation: 782

Posted 06 July 2011 - 07:07 AM

I'd be curious to know the impact this would have on medical expenses. It seems like we could drop them quite a bit with regular maintenance so we minimize emergency care as well as late life care.

If our bodies even gave up at their usual time but maintained a usable state until then, we could increase our productivity tremendously too. Understandably most people wouldn't find working past 65 enticing, but I'd love to be active and contributing to something into my 90s.

#10 Hodgman   Moderators   -  Reputation: 29567

Posted 06 July 2011 - 07:20 AM

On the down-side, the cost of 1000-year life expectancy is that we'll all be eating fauxburgers.

#11 JoeCooper   Members   -  Reputation: 338

Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:04 AM

... Not to mention that we already aren't set up for people to live as long as they do, let alone twice as long.



Part of the problem there is not the lifespan aspect but the aging and the idea that people should retire. Humans are not married to the idea and having a society without the concept of retirement is in our behavioral toolkit, so to speak. As far as I know the idea of pervasive retirement didn't show up until the 19th century.


The idea of living to 1000 is more about eliminating aging as a physiological concept.

But what I find interesting is what it would do to human skill, intelligence, etc. Basically there would be a class of people with centuries of experience and hindsight, without terrible brains.

I decided I like this idea personally just because there never seems enough time to do the things I'd like to. Obviously everyone still dies; I recall one study in the 90s that suggested that people would have an average lifespan of about 500 years if you eliminated aging because of accidents, disease, etc. (And we're still fighting that perpetual war against microfauna.)

But even 200 is a damn long time if you're effective.

You can plan with that as well as you can with 20; you can say "I'll just be an engineer for 50 years and I'll try writing after that" as well as you can say "I'll just go to school for 5 years", both with the same universally accepted caveat that you might get hit by a bus tomorrow, but that's OK because you can't really plan around that anyway.

I'd like to feel like I could, potentially, spend 20 years on Titan for the Full Effect even if the flight time is 7 years in cryosleep (or whatever) and know that people will probably still be around when I return.

But obviously it's not for everyone, and I think a lot of folks if they went for it would, eventually, get tired of it and off themselves or go off the anti-aging regime.

#12 Zethariel   Members   -  Reputation: 310

Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:30 AM

People living up to 1000 would be a disaster IMO. Think about it -- you would have to work around 700 years before you retire. Or even more, knowing how greedy some can be. And I guess the population would dwindle as well, coz as long as they have healthy bodies, they have time to have kids, right?

Economically, it would be a great hinderance too. Same old people would run the same old companies and things would stangate. Why give a job to a 20 yo, when you have a 3 century man who has more experience and wisdom, and whom you know so well?

Same goes for science -- no rotation whatsoever. without fresh minds, we wouldn't get any further, and our civilization would collapse.

Oh, it's 4.30 PM, time to run home. Life is too short to stay overtime at work.
Disclaimer: Each my post is intended as an attempt of helping and/or brining some meaningfull insight to the topic at hand. Due to my nature, my good intentions will not always be plainly visible. I apologise in advance and assure I mean no harm and do not intend to insult anyone, unless stated otherwise

Homepage (Under Construction)

Check my profile for funny D&D/WH FRP quotes :)

#13 D.Chhetri   Members   -  Reputation: 181

Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:39 AM

Yuck, I can barely stand being 21, why in the world would I want to be 1000 years old( I know I know I wont but still...). Man I swear we humans are too powerful for our own good, so much so that we're going to end up killing our race.
Edge cases will show your design flaws in your code!
Visit my site
Visit my FaceBook
Visit my github

#14 A Brain in a Vat   Members   -  Reputation: 313

Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:47 AM

People living up to 1000 would be a disaster IMO. Think about it -- you would have to work around 700 years before you retire. Or even more, knowing how greedy some can be. And I guess the population would dwindle as well, coz as long as they have healthy bodies, they have time to have kids, right?

Economically, it would be a great hinderance too. Same old people would run the same old companies and things would stangate. Why give a job to a 20 yo, when you have a 3 century man who has more experience and wisdom, and whom you know so well?

Same goes for science -- no rotation whatsoever. without fresh minds, we wouldn't get any further, and our civilization would collapse.

Oh, it's 4.30 PM, time to run home. Life is too short to stay overtime at work.

I'll offer a countering viewpoint. What if Einstein had had the chance to live to 200? or even 1000? What could he have come up with?

We suffer from an astounding amount of thought-waste. Think about it, we have to train every new human from scratch. We waste 20+ years just giving each human a basic knowledge framework to fill a specific role in society. Add 5 to 10 years to yield an expert (PhD) in an intensive discipline. Then they spend 30 or 40 years making use of that investment, all the while accumulating invaluable experience, and then they retire, and we as a society have to spend 25-30 years training their replacement -- only, that replacement won't have acquired the experience that can't be taught.

It's not just about knowledge or skills, it's about wisdom. I have a hard time imagining someone who's been around for 700 years being as immature and irresponsible as the monkeys that currently inhabit our political offices, for instance.

#15 D.Chhetri   Members   -  Reputation: 181

Posted 06 July 2011 - 09:09 AM

>>I'll offer a countering viewpoint. What if Einstein had had the chance to live to 200? or even 1000? What could he have come up with?

I'll offer a countering viewpoint to your countering viewpoint. Your only looking at it from one angle. There are numerous possibilities. Considering he was one of the major help in creating atomic bomb, most probably he would be working for the military trying to create something that would destroy a whole continent.
Edge cases will show your design flaws in your code!
Visit my site
Visit my FaceBook
Visit my github

#16 A Brain in a Vat   Members   -  Reputation: 313

Posted 06 July 2011 - 09:12 AM

>>I'll offer a countering viewpoint. What if Einstein had had the chance to live to 200? or even 1000? What could he have come up with?

I'll offer a countering viewpoint to your countering viewpoint. Your only looking at it from one angle. There are numerous possibilities. Considering he was one of the major person in creating atomic bomb, most probably he would be working for the military trying to create something that would destroy a whole continent.

LMAO. Now you've shown an amazing amount of ignorance. I suggest you look up Einstein and what he stood for.

See, in 700 years you'll probably have learned not to make such silly comments based on absolutely no facts at all.

#17 ChurchSkiz   Members   -  Reputation: 444

Posted 06 July 2011 - 09:15 AM


People living up to 1000 would be a disaster IMO. Think about it -- you would have to work around 700 years before you retire. Or even more, knowing how greedy some can be. And I guess the population would dwindle as well, coz as long as they have healthy bodies, they have time to have kids, right?

Economically, it would be a great hinderance too. Same old people would run the same old companies and things would stangate. Why give a job to a 20 yo, when you have a 3 century man who has more experience and wisdom, and whom you know so well?

Same goes for science -- no rotation whatsoever. without fresh minds, we wouldn't get any further, and our civilization would collapse.

Oh, it's 4.30 PM, time to run home. Life is too short to stay overtime at work.

I'll offer a countering viewpoint. What if Einstein had had the chance to live to 200? or even 1000? What could he have come up with?


I was just going to reply, what if Tesla lived another 100 years. Everyone would have endless, free, mobile power.

As far as the work thing goes, I don't think anyone would NEED to work 700 years. I mean if you're smart and you save, 30-40 years of work generates enough assets to be self-sustaining. So basically you'd still work till you're 65, but then you'd go on a 950 year retirement.

We'd have to curb birth rates though or we'd be in a sh*tstorm real quick. It would be a good time to propose my corporate sterilization/birth application idea.

#18 szecs   Members   -  Reputation: 2112

Posted 06 July 2011 - 09:17 AM

On the down-side, the cost of 1000-year life expectancy is that we'll all be eating fauxburgers.


I want to taste human flesh. Anyhoo, I think it would be a good thing (artificial meat), if it was cheaper than real meat.
Anyhoo 2: well, we are not many enough on Earth already, we should be much more by living for 1000 years. 1000 years of unemployment rulez!!!1

#19 D.Chhetri   Members   -  Reputation: 181

Posted 06 July 2011 - 09:21 AM


>>I'll offer a countering viewpoint. What if Einstein had had the chance to live to 200? or even 1000? What could he have come up with?

I'll offer a countering viewpoint to your countering viewpoint. Your only looking at it from one angle. There are numerous possibilities. Considering he was one of the major person in creating atomic bomb, most probably he would be working for the military trying to create something that would destroy a whole continent.

LMAO. Now you've shown an amazing amount of ignorance. I suggest you look up Einstein and what he stood for.

See, in 700 years you'll probably have learned not to make such silly comments based on absolutely no facts at all.


Sure he was a pacifist at one point, but at another point, specifically when Hitler rose in Germany, it was Einstien that signed a letter to the president Franklin Roosevelt urging that a bomb be built. So in the realm of possibility its not absurd.

EDIT: Just a though, if we lived to be a millennium then we might possibly see jesus? lol
Edge cases will show your design flaws in your code!
Visit my site
Visit my FaceBook
Visit my github

#20 A Brain in a Vat   Members   -  Reputation: 313

Posted 06 July 2011 - 09:42 AM

Sure he was a pacifist at one point, but at another point, specifically when Hitler rose in Germany, it was Einstien that signed a letter to the president Franklin Roosevelt urging that a bomb be built. So in the realm of possibility its not absurd.

EDIT: Just a though, if we lived to be a millennium then we might possibly see jesus? lol

He also later called that the greatest mistake of his life. That is, he learned, through experience. He became wiser.

It's therefore not only unlikely but slanderous to suggest that "most probably he would be working for the military trying to create something that would destroy a whole continent."

You no doubt know this, if you know about the Einstein–Szilárd letter, and it's intellectually dishonest to leave it out of your posts.




Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS