Members - Reputation: 129
Posted 24 January 2012 - 08:20 AM
The catalysts were little gems that you picked up that would give stat bonuses. You placed them into a grid, and if you matched an entire row of the same color/type then they all got a bonus to their effect.
Now, in Darkspore, these were temporary items that only lasted for a part of a game session.
The idea I am working on involves equipping gems into some template to craft jewelry. Maybe the gems would have different shapes, and you have to fill the box tetris-style? Maybe the gems are in a grid and you have to match some aspect of them in a line? (Color, shape, etc)
The goal would be to make item choices more interesting than just picking the item with the best stats. Players may have to choose whether to use a weaker gem in order to better 'solve the puzzle' and get the puzzle bonus, etc.
Does anyone have any ideas besides gem-tetris and match-a-line?
Thanks in advance for any feedback!
Members - Reputation: 174
Posted 24 January 2012 - 10:05 AM
Members - Reputation: 129
Posted 24 January 2012 - 10:31 AM
How about thinking of gems in terms of logic gates? Having four types of gems that correspond to logic gates which you can connect differently to get different results.
Interesting. I'll have to explore this idea, thanks!
When I read this topic, I immediately thought of Final Fantasy 7's materia system. It's an old game available for PC and Playstation 1. Might be worth checking out. Well... Final Fantasy 7 is worth checking out regardless of what you are doing.
Good one! It has been quite a while since I dusted off FF7. This will be good brush-up material.
Senior Staff - Reputation: 17989
Posted 24 January 2012 - 04:27 PM
Treating the gems as logic gates for example is pretty cool, and would certainly lead to some interesting possibilities; but it also means that anyone who doesn't already understand logic gates has to learn them, forever play at a disadvantage, or will just never really understand your inventory system. Logic gates aren't too complicated, but a lot of people won't understand them without some help, and some people may not catch on at all.
I'd stick with a simpler idea such as one of your originals where you match lines of items or fill a space tetris style; anything used in a simple casual game that doesn't take long to learn should be appropriate.
Sorry for not really contributing any new ideas as such, but I hope the input is helpful!
- Jason Astle-Adams.
Crossbones+ - Reputation: 2680
Posted 25 January 2012 - 06:45 AM
What if you get gems and gem boxes. Each box has a different shape associated with it if you fill the box with gems in correct shape those gems and box vanish you get all those bonuses permanently add to your character.
Writing Blog: The Aspiring Writer
Legacy - Black Prince Saga Book One - By Alexander Ballard
Current Projects: Rags to Riches - prototype increment game - Design V1
- Pocket Financial Assistant - app - Personal Finance Organizer and Budgeting Manager.
- End of Line - game- Cyberpunk Text Adventure Game.
Members - Reputation: 460
Posted 25 January 2012 - 06:29 PM
In it, using the enchanting skill/tool, you have 3 slots for ingredients and 1 slot for a catalyst and 1 slot for the item to be enchanted. Then they have a dozen categories of enchanting ingredients with 5 levels to each type, and 3 types of catalysts. The hardest monsters in the game can skin for a lvl 5 ingredient. Different enchanting "recipe's" use different combinations of ingredients/catalyst type.
Then, say the recipe for adding damage to a weapon is 5 eyes, 5 tooth, 5 claw and 1 nith catalyst. If you use all level 5 ingredients, you will add 30% to the weapons base damage, but level 5 ingredients were really hard to get, so maybe you don't have 5 of each type. You can use any level of those same ingredients, but it will drop the effect of the enchant based on the average of all the ingredient levels. So level 1 ingredients across the board might be 5% damage increase, a combo of 1, 3, 5 would give a 10% increase.
I'm doing something kinda similar but just giving each "ingredient" a different value, then finding the sum of the values and activating a different "mod" based on that number. But there's more than 1 combination of ingredients that can activate the same mod, at the same time there's tons of combinations possible.
Moderators - Reputation: 4819
Posted 25 January 2012 - 06:45 PM
Phone game idea available free to someone who will develop it (Alphadoku game - the only existing phone game of this type is both for windows phone only and awful. PM for details.)
I want to help design a "sandpark" MMO. Optional interactive story with quests and deeply characterized NPCs, plus sandbox elements like player-craftable housing and lots of other crafting. If you are starting a design of this type, please PM me. I also love pet-breeding games.
Members - Reputation: 150
Posted 27 January 2012 - 06:12 PM
Thanks guys, checking out Darkfall Online and ATITD!
ATITD is a goldmine for unorthadox, complex crafting systems and I heartily second its recommendation.
I'll temper jbadam's point with my own take on doing something strange with equipment augmentation.
A system like this, an upgrade system, crafting system, whatever, should exist to reinforce you game's core mechanics. Some games make really elegant combat their big thing, and really hone on in that aspect of the design. In order to keep it pure, things like crafting are left simple such that they support the combat.
I don't think there's anything wrong with making a crafting system with deeper mechanics. In fact, I think it could be rather interesting. Just be sure that it jives with your design's overall sense of purpose. If it ends up being a confusing or clunky mechanic, it will hurt things.
Onto the difficulty issue (some players may or may not get it), I'll suggest you take a look at this article.
I really like the points in it. I'd puzzled over WHY people liked Demon Souls so much 'till my puzzler was sore, or perhaps more specifically, how such a difficult game was made with it also being highly enjoyable. I think your augmentation system, if it is a deep mechanic that people will have to learn , might benefit from a Darwinian curve. Meaning, don't let the player get by without understanding how the augmentation system works. Make it a requirement for progress at the very start of the game, and force them to learn it. Facilitate the learning, though, and make sure the system is fair and transparent to the user, but don't let them progress past level 1/the tutorial without really understanding how the system works.
This way you can really bring that mechanic into the fold for your game and make it significant. It will make it easier to balance since you can assume the player is using the mechanic efficiently, so you don't have to worry about players that are kind of muddling through the game without knowledge of the augmentation system. If you let players do that, you run the risk of them hitting a point where they can't progress due to the game suddenly demanding that they know what they're doing with the augmentation system. It's harder for them to learn at this point (because they think they've been doing the right thing all along), and will get them very frustrated.