• Create Account

# parallel

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

4 replies to this topic

### #1fanaticlatic  Members   -  Reputation: 473

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 02 February 2012 - 09:58 AM

Hi all,

I had a debate with a friend that we can't solve (read: agree).

The question is when you have two finite horizontal lines lying on the same plane that never touch are they parallel?

Hopefully you can shed some light on it.

Hinchy.
"I have more fingers in more pies than a leper at a bakery!"

### #2Cornstalks  Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 7022

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 02 February 2012 - 10:08 AM

The question is when you have two finite horizontal lines lying on the same plane that never touch are they parallel?

Assuming you mean Parallel in Euclidien Geometry, you'll see that condition 2 requires that "Line m is on the same plane as line l but does not intersect l (even assuming that lines extend to infinity in either direction)." i.e. if you cannot extend the two lines infinitely in either direction and still hold this property, then they aren't parallel.
[ I was ninja'd 71 times before I stopped counting a long time ago ] [ f.k.a. MikeTacular ] [ My Blog ] [ SWFer: Gaplessly looped MP3s in your Flash games ]

### #3xytor  Members   -  Reputation: 136

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 02 February 2012 - 10:19 AM

By 'finite' do you mean they are line segments?

### #4fanaticlatic  Members   -  Reputation: 473

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 02 February 2012 - 10:32 AM

By 'finite' do you mean they are line segments?

yes.

Assuming you mean Parallel in Euclidien Geometry, you'll see that condition 2 requires that "Line m is on the same plane as line l but does not intersect l (even assuming that lines extend to infinity in either direction)." i.e. if you cannot extend the two lines infinitely in either direction and still hold this property, then they aren't parallel.

I found this link too. The lines represent two blocks of time, in the discussion me and my mate had. So not euclidean geometry otherwise he'd have been correct ;)
"I have more fingers in more pies than a leper at a bakery!"

### #5Cornstalks  Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 7022

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 02 February 2012 - 10:38 AM

Assuming you mean Parallel in Euclidien Geometry, you'll see that condition 2 requires that "Line m is on the same plane as line l but does not intersect l (even assuming that lines extend to infinity in either direction)." i.e. if you cannot extend the two lines infinitely in either direction and still hold this property, then they aren't parallel.

I found this link too. The lines represent two blocks of time, in the discussion me and my mate had. So not euclidean geometry otherwise he'd have been correct ;)

Well that changes some things. I don't know exactly how you're defining the space you're working in of time, but you'll note that in hyperbolic space it's possible to have lines that are parallel (they never intersect in the plane) that still intersect (but only in the limit to infinity) (so as long as the two line segments don't intersect in the plane, but maybe in infinity, they'd be parallel (but only in a hyperbolic space)). So it all depends on what space you're working in.
[ I was ninja'd 71 times before I stopped counting a long time ago ] [ f.k.a. MikeTacular ] [ My Blog ] [ SWFer: Gaplessly looped MP3s in your Flash games ]

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

PARTNERS