Title explains itself.
If I have dx9 app and want to upgrade apis, would there be any reason to write it with dx10 api when i can write with dx11 api and use feature levels to target the correct hardware (dx10)?
-J
1
Should anyone be writing new apps with DX10 when DX11 feature levels exist?
Started by AverageJoeSSU, Jul 19 2012 10:32 AM
9 replies to this topic
Sponsor:
#2 Members - Reputation: 1308
Posted 19 July 2012 - 10:38 AM
the only reasons I can think about is that in DX11 you'll have to write your own classes for Font rendering and Sprite rendering plus you'll have to compile the Effect framework yourself (if you want to use it).
But I don't see these as tasks that would scare a developer that choose the DX11 way.
But I don't see these as tasks that would scare a developer that choose the DX11 way.
#4 Moderators - Reputation: 5454
Posted 19 July 2012 - 02:50 PM
There really isn't any reason to use DX10 anymore, DX11 is essentially a superset of the same functionality and can run on a wider range hardware. Also you don't even have to write your own Font/Sprite classes anymore, since Shawn Hargreaves has provided us with DirectXTK.
The Effects11 framework is more stripped down compared to the version that shipped with D3D10, and like kunos mentioned you have to compile it yourself. However I really feel that the way the Effects framework is set up has become a pretty poor fit for the way that shaders have evolved, and I don't really recommend using it.
The Effects11 framework is more stripped down compared to the version that shipped with D3D10, and like kunos mentioned you have to compile it yourself. However I really feel that the way the Effects framework is set up has become a pretty poor fit for the way that shaders have evolved, and I don't really recommend using it.
#5 Members - Reputation: 1308
Posted 19 July 2012 - 10:46 PM
Also you don't even have to write your own Font/Sprite classes anymore, since Shawn Hargreaves has provided us with DirectXTK.
Wow! What a find! I didn't know about this one, thank you very much.
I also agree about the Effect, when I started with DX11 I thought it was going to be impossible to do without, but not only it is possible, but it is pretty easy and everything makes much more sense.
#6 Members - Reputation: 387
Posted 20 July 2012 - 02:41 PM
Hey Guys,
So how does this work with GPU's that dont have dx11 drivers or the OS doesn't have the d3d11 lib. So I guess this is vista before service pack 2 or 3? Is this a tiny fraction of machines (Microsoft forces these updates don't they?)?
So how does this work with GPU's that dont have dx11 drivers or the OS doesn't have the d3d11 lib. So I guess this is vista before service pack 2 or 3? Is this a tiny fraction of machines (Microsoft forces these updates don't they?)?
------------------------------
Blog
Blog
#8 Moderators - Reputation: 5454
Posted 20 July 2012 - 03:23 PM
I'm not sure what the driver situation is for DX10 vs. DX11 on lower feature levels. As far as I know most of the Nvidia, AMD, and Intel GPU's support DX11 so I don't think it's an issue unless perhaps the user is on Vista and hasn't updated their drivers in a very long time.
As far as the OS-level components goes, Windows 7 comes with the D3D11 runtimes so you don't need to worry about that case. However with Windows Vista it's possible that the D3D11 components aren't installed if they haven't run the standard Windows Updates. This article explains how to detect this case, and also how to use the Windows Update API to initiate an install of the required components.
As far as the OS-level components goes, Windows 7 comes with the D3D11 runtimes so you don't need to worry about that case. However with Windows Vista it's possible that the D3D11 components aren't installed if they haven't run the standard Windows Updates. This article explains how to detect this case, and also how to use the Windows Update API to initiate an install of the required components.
Edited by MJP, 20 July 2012 - 03:24 PM.
#10 Members - Reputation: 3828
Posted 20 July 2012 - 05:51 PM
Some research at the likes of the Steam hardware surveys helps a lot here. There's definitely a tendency to overstate the importance of targetting older hardware; over 90% of systems in the survey now have D3D10/11 class hardware. Link: http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/.
Regarding OS, Windows 7 is at close to 70%, and Vista (total for all variants) has dropped well below even XP 32-bit, with 5.83% for 64-bit Vista and 5.03% for 32-bit Vista. Link: http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/#cat0.
It can be quite safely said that Vista users who've never bothered to install updates are not a viable percentage of any concievable target audience, and as a consequence this is a non-issue. Aim for 11 with feature levels and you're hitting on the high end of somewhere between 70% and 80% of target; aim for 10 only and you're hitting only marginally less.
The concerning thing is that XP is still holding reasonably steady (which explains the discrepency between ~80% with Vista/7 and ~90% with D3D10/11 class hardware), but since we're talking about D3D10 or 11 that's an irrelevance for the purposes of this discussion.
Regarding OS, Windows 7 is at close to 70%, and Vista (total for all variants) has dropped well below even XP 32-bit, with 5.83% for 64-bit Vista and 5.03% for 32-bit Vista. Link: http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/#cat0.
It can be quite safely said that Vista users who've never bothered to install updates are not a viable percentage of any concievable target audience, and as a consequence this is a non-issue. Aim for 11 with feature levels and you're hitting on the high end of somewhere between 70% and 80% of target; aim for 10 only and you're hitting only marginally less.
The concerning thing is that XP is still holding reasonably steady (which explains the discrepency between ~80% with Vista/7 and ~90% with D3D10/11 class hardware), but since we're talking about D3D10 or 11 that's an irrelevance for the purposes of this discussion.
It appears that the gentleman thought C++ was extremely difficult and he was overjoyed that the machine was absorbing it; he understood that good C++ is difficult but the best C++ is well-nigh unintelligible.
