Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

We're offering banner ads on our site from just $5!

1. Details HERE. 2. GDNet+ Subscriptions HERE. 3. Ad upload HERE.


Normalized Device Co-ordinates to World Space


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
2 replies to this topic

#1 LordSputnik   Members   -  Reputation: 132

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 17 August 2012 - 04:40 PM

I did write a wonderfully detailed post about my problem, then accidentally closed the tab. So this'll be a little more brief, but hopefully still detailed enough to get some help!

Anyway, I'm trying to convert mouse co-ordinates to world space. At the moment, I'm passing in two normalized device co-ordinates, (x,y,-1.0f) and (x,y,1.0f), then transforming them by the inverse of (proj_matrix*view_matrix). I'm expecting to get two points - one on the near clipping plane and one on the far clipping plane, but I'm not. The near plane is 30, and the far plane is 5000, but I'm getting z values of 0.7 and 7 respectively.

I'm not doing any multiplication by any w value to get to clipping space - could that be the problem? If so, how should I get the w value to multiply all the elements by?

Here's the bits of my code that are relevant:

Ray newray(0.2f,-0.2f,-1.0f,0.2f,-0.2f,1.0f);
	newray.SetMatrices(cam_->GetProjectionMatrix(),cam_->GetViewMatrix());
	newray.Calculate();

class Ray
{
  cml::matrix44f_c inv_mat_;
  vector3f start_, end_;

  vector3f transformed_start_, transformed_end_;
public:
  Ray(float sx, float sy, float sz, float dx, float dy, float dz);
  void SetRayEnds(float sx, float sy, float sz, float dx, float dy, float dz);

  void SetMatrices(const cml::matrix44f_c & proj, const cml::matrix44f_c & view);
  void Calculate();

  vector3f GetYIntersection(float y);
};

Ray::Ray(float sx, float sy, float sz, float dx, float dy, float dz) :
	inv_mat_(cml::identity_4x4()),
	start_(sx,sy,sz),
	end_(dx,dy,dz)
  {

  }
  void Ray::SetRayEnds(float sx, float sy, float sz, float dx, float dy, float dz)
  {
	start_.set(sx,sy,sz);
	end_.set(dx,dy,dz);
  }

  void Ray::SetMatrices(const cml::matrix44f_c & proj, const cml::matrix44f_c & view)
  {
	inv_mat_ = cml::inverse(proj*view);
  }

  void Ray::Calculate()
  {
	transformed_start_ = cml::transform_point(inv_mat_, start_);
	transformed_end_ = cml::transform_point(inv_mat_, end_);
  }

To all the matrix and graphics wizards, what am I doing wrong? Is this the way that you would approach the problem?

Thanks for your help!
Ben

EDIT: World space, not eye space.

Edited by LordSputnik, 18 August 2012 - 01:53 AM.


Sponsor:

#2 Geometrian   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 1599

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 17 August 2012 - 05:33 PM

normalized device co-ordinates, (x,y,-1.0f) and (x,y,1.0f)

You are passing x and y in the range [-1.0,1.0], right?

Also, if you want to transform to "eye space", you only want to hit it with the inverse projection matrix. The inverse view matrix would transform from eye space to world space.

The perspective divide normalizes the x,y,z coordinates by w so that the homogeneous coordinate falls on the subspace w = 1. You shouldn't have to undo this.

Essentially, what you want to do is what gluUnProject does, but without the modelview matrix. Have a look at the pseudocode on the man page http://www.opengl.org/sdk/docs/man/xhtml/gluUnProject.xml.
And a Unix user said rm -rf *.* and all was null and void...|There's no place like 127.0.0.1|The Application "Programmer" has unexpectedly quit. An error of type A.M. has occurred.

#3 LordSputnik   Members   -  Reputation: 132

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 18 August 2012 - 02:02 AM

Very sorry, I did mean world space - it was late and I was sleepy!

The only thing I can think it could be is the cml::transform_point function I'm using - I've assumed that this multiplies the input point by the matrix as gluUnProject does, but that might not be right. I'll try making a 4x1 matrix containing the values plus the 1 at the bottom, and use straightforward matrix multiplication.




Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS