Start cringing: Some guy might be getting his worst day cut out for him.
#2 Crossbones+ - Reputation: 1459
Posted 12 September 2012 - 08:19 AM
Edited by slicer4ever, 12 September 2012 - 08:19 AM.
#3 Members - Reputation: 1862
Posted 12 September 2012 - 09:05 AM
The warning list, too, might not be accurate since a warning generated in a header that is included multiple times will generate multiple warnings, and often you can eliminate a huge piece of your warning list just by fixing that one header.
Edited by FLeBlanc, 12 September 2012 - 09:08 AM.
#7 Members - Reputation: 632
Posted 12 September 2012 - 05:40 PM
On a handful of projects I've been on I've turned off intellisense because it can be a real resource hog on some larger projects with atypical build processes.With today's IDE with syntax highlighting and intellisense, I'm surprised that somebody are still making compile-time errors.
My intellisense-sense would start tingling as soon as nothing comes up when I expected it to come up.
#8 Members - Reputation: 488
Posted 13 September 2012 - 10:54 PM
It's most likely just missing references. It always looks a little scary when you build with a missing reference. Those errors add up very fast.
Ugh, aye, I hate it with C++ and headers when you make an error, and it gets reproted like 50 times because the file is included 50 times. Really VS? Can't you figure out it and group them already???
(that's on VS2008, mebbe 2010 already fixed that)
#9 Members - Reputation: 604
Posted 15 September 2012 - 07:00 AM
#10 Members - Reputation: 455
Posted 15 September 2012 - 08:22 AM
With today's IDE with syntax highlighting and intellisense, I'm surprised that somebody are still making compile-time errors.
My intellisense-sense would start tingling as soon as nothing comes up when I expected it to come up.
Yeah, because intellisense (especially pre-2010) is known to work all the time and not delay itself for several minutes on non-trivial projects.






