Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

What would you want from a zombie apocalypse simulator.


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
26 replies to this topic

#1 dtg108   Members   -  Reputation: 394

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 21 November 2012 - 10:29 PM

Hey guys, first of all, I'm going to make this short, as I'm on my phone. A while back I posted about feedback for my idea. Now, since we are working on models, we want to know: what would you like to see in a zombie simulator? In our MMO, we will make it where you have to eat, sleep, drink, and pretty much, survive. We were just wondering what you would like to see in this game.

Sponsor:

#2 Ashaman73   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 7442

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 01:15 AM

In our MMO

First off, get rid of the first M. The zombie setting lives from the doomed, forlorn setting where only a handful of people survived, there's no place for massive.

zombie simulator

What is a simulator for an unknown fictional scenario ? Simulators are not really funny at first and for sure are not really games. The reason people play simulators are, that they try to overcome a certain challenge or to provoke certain emerging situations. So, I would like to see some interesting challenges and a pretty high degree of interaction with the environment.

#3 samoth   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 4767

Like
7Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 05:45 AM

I'd like to see something that is not zombies. It seems the entire world nowadays is divided between vampires, bash-da-orcz variations of Lord of the Rings, and zombies. Or, gay looking zombie pirates, which is kind of the best of two worlds...

Please do something else. And please don't do vampires.

If you want to do a survival horror game, that's fine, but there must exist other things in the universe than just zombies. Demons, aliens, mad science experiments, dragons, cloned dinosaurs, anything is better. Not like these haven't been done before (there's probably not a single idea that hasn't been done), but at least they've not been beaten to death a million times.
Also, not-zombie-adversaries wouldn't have to be as braindead as a zombie is by definition. They could have cool special powers, which admittedly is hard to justify on a zombie.

Why not something like a cult that wants the world to end and attempt to kill all who don't join their lines? They've built the mother of all bombs, too, and when the last not-cult person is dead, they will use the bomb to destroy the planet. Of course the end of the world is the most sacred moment, which brings you together with The Creator. Therefore all non-believers must be killed before the world can end.
That story would have an interesting twist. You don't want to be killed by them, but you also don't want to hide too well. Since when they think everyone else is dead, they'll press the nuke button, and you lose, too.

Or prisoners. Let's say some incident has caused a large urban area being transformed into a prison. Just like in the "Escape from New York" movie(s). Now they've found a way out and come in hundred thousands to take revenge on everyone outside.
Same thing as a zombie story, except they've got guns and pillow cases filled with soap, they can drive motorcycles, and they aren't zombies.

#4 Ashaman73   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 7442

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 05:58 AM

Though I'm with samoth, the zombie topic is really dead, kind of... but taking a look at the avatar of dtg108, I believe that he will not change his mind :D

#5 Hodgman   Moderators   -  Reputation: 30370

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 06:00 AM

what would you like to see in a zombie simulator?

DayZ (hardcore, lawless, survival), but without the cheating epidemic that ruins DayZ, and with more tools to allow for attempted civilized interaction with other survivors.
Also, infection. You get bit and you've got to hide it from your crew, lest they shoot you before your time is up.

The zombie setting lives from the doomed, forlorn setting where only a handful of people survived, there's no place for massive

Massive player counts could be cool if the world was also equally massive.
DayZ avoids crowding by 'sharding' 100,000 players into few thousand world-instances of 50 players each, so that on it's 225km^2 map, you've got a good chance of being alone. This works -- meeting another player is a rare event, and personally, I usually hide or run because of the 'stranger danger'. Can't trust anyone if they know you've got beans!

If instead, the world was 10000 times bigger and no 'sharding' was used, it could be pretty damn epic. It's common in the apocalypse setting for people to be hearing news of places 100's of miles away (via rumour, or radio, etc), which results in a "quest" to reach the source of that news, which takes a very long time, seeing that working motorized transport is now rare. This doesn't work in DayZ, because I can walk anywhere in the world in about an hour or two.

Edited by Hodgman, 22 November 2012 - 06:11 AM.


#6 Madhed   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2906

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 07:15 AM

^This^

What I really hated about DayZ apart from the bugs was the zombie behaviour. Those spatic, zig-zagging, hawk-eyed sprinters... really killed it for me.
I'd like to see some more complex behaviour. Different types of zombies, with fast and aware types being the exception.
"I am legend" types would be pretty cool, you know, thoses that only come out in the dark.

Some kind of alliance system with base building, safe-zones, pvp.

#7 Luis Guimaraes   Members   -  Reputation: 231

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 08:46 AM

Wha tI want from a Zombie apocalypse simulator:

- To be like NeoScavenger in 3d and in real time.
- To NOT be multiplayer at all, specially MMO.
- To be necessary to wear chemical suits, and avoid all physical contact with zombies.

Edited by Luis Guimaraes, 22 November 2012 - 08:47 AM.


#8 dtg108   Members   -  Reputation: 394

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 09:21 AM

... but taking a look at the avatar of dtg108, I believe that he will not change his mind

Sorry, but it's true :D. Please din't suggest not using zombies.

Anyway, I've decided to use some of the ideas you guys suggested. Here's what they are so far.

DayZ (hardcore, lawless, survival), but without the cheating epidemic that ruins DayZ

Agreed, we will have classic zombies, the slow moving, mindless ones.

with more tools to allow for attempted civilized interaction with other survivors.

Also agreed, we will have a surrender system, as well as a couple of other features allowing you to communicate more directly.

Also, infection. You get bit and you've got to hide it from your crew, lest they shoot you before your time is up.

You sir are a genius! I hadn't even thought about this, but I'm definitely using it.

If instead, the world was 10000 times bigger and no 'sharding' was used, it could be pretty damn epic.

Yes, the terrain is in production, and it is way bigger than Day-Z's terrain. Also, only about 50-100 to a map, because it will be bigger than Day-Z.

Thanks for the ideas guys, keep'em coming :D!

#9 Mratthew   Members   -  Reputation: 1540

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 10:04 AM

Crowds, real threatening crowds of humans and zombies and the true spread of panic and confusion. Watching the faces of people shift from being unsure and unsettled, to worry, to panic then to horror and true fear and flight. Dynamic true sim of group fear during a disaster. If this is meant to be a simulator then this is the angle you should explore, navigating the chaos of panicked dangerous people. Capturing the emotional distress of the masses and the true disaster of the chaos these masses create. Zombies aren't scary, people are scary. Zombies (like all monsters) just show a side of people that we can't escape.

I disagree with this being something other then a zombie game however if its suppose to be a simulation, then zombies should be just another part of what is the real survival during this type of apocalyptic outbreak. Since the real threat is surviving each other. Finding ways to survive together (this is why walking dead is so go).

The book World WarZ explores the idea of people losing their mind and believing that they are zombies and how dangerous they are because although they can feel pain they have full mobility these are proper running zombies.

#10 Waterlimon   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2562

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:13 AM

-Good armor and all, and good health-kits, and so that you fall easily and people can take ur stuff, but you will likely be able to heal yourself or be healed. In most games the enemy needs to kill you to get your stuff, i find that annoying.

-Ability to build an awesome base out of planks and random metal pieces, and surviving there for a year with your rainwater gatherer and carrot farm.

-Zombies or whatever you will use should move in groups and less often individually. Groups should move slow. So if you are scouting its easy to avoid them but if a large group is slowly advancing right towards your base you have a problem. Individual zombies shouldnt be a problem for bases because they shouldnt dig and investigate everything on their way.

-Making huge reserves of everything like loaded batteries and food and resources is fun.

-Vehicles like bikes and trailers and whatever because fuel is rare

-Ability to communicate
*Diaries
*Player in game drawable maps
*Smoke from fires

o3o


#11 Orymus3   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 8964

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 01:45 PM

I've been interested by such a concept a while back.
I think you should envision this as a survival game first.

we will make it where you have to eat, sleep, drink, and pretty much, survive.

Now, that's all good and fine, but this is a feature list and its really just that.
What you need to do is make sure that:
A - These features are fun to interact with, not just requirements that you need to grind.
B - That they fit within your gameplay and are part of a loop.

To make sure its fun and not just a grindfest, it implies there is gameplay involved, and as little manipulation as possible. Picking up consumables as you walk over them has its uses (it emphasizes exploration for example) but it won't really emphasize "eating" per se. It all depends what you want to emphasize.
Likewise, sleeping is nice, but if this is an MMO and everything occurs at the same time for everyone, "sleeping" will be mundane and boring. You'll go to sleep and wait until you are rested while staring at your blank computer screen. Even with a creative approach, such as sleeping while you're away (meaning other players need to defend you for example) you end up with a limiting strategy. Players can't log on more than X hours per day so they can let their character rest. But at least, it gives a reason to find a safe haven and return there, although it doesn't appear to be "fun".
What's your take on "sleep" as a gameplay element?

Now, to make sure everything is part of your core gameplay loop of survival, you need things that interact well together. As previously mentionned, eating by stepping over consumables (supplies/food) is going to be relevant. It forces your players out of their safe haven, into the "risky zone". Assuming your zombies aren't particularly bright, they probably won't be able to kill you in your safe havens, but eventually, you'll need to draw out for supplies and whatnot, and this mechanic interacts well with the core loop: players go out, take what they need, try to survive, and come back to the safe zone.

I can see a number of things working:
- Scarce ammunitions and the ability to raid depots (forcing you out to maintain peace keeping at safe havens where you can just snipe zombies). This also forces you to take on zombies hand-to-hand whenever possible to minimize bullet consumption
- Crafting at the safe haven: a lot of zombie games are anti-social, where everyone is in for themselves. It is hard to force people to cooperate, and may not be the goal, but having a "common gathering place" will force social interactions. One way to do this is to make these safe havens, easily defendable but without supplies (food, etc).
Add in all components in there to perform crafting, and you'll toss your players on their way to acquire components.
For example, if you have a bullet-making machine in the safe haven, but no gunpowder or shells, players will go out, find the necessary components, pile them in stashes, rebuild their ammo stocks, and perhaps sell the rest to other players or something. They may end up trading bullets (what their safe haven can produce) for food (what another safe haven can produce) and organize raids together to get as much resources as possible.

While some players may choose to band together, others will be lone wolves or roguish bands. It's the natural order of things that some players will do the hard work (fetch component, craft, try to replicate a near-functioning society) whereas other will take advantage of this new society. These rogues will scavenge what they can, oftentimes putting other players at risk, or plainly attacking them for their supplies. The enemy is not always the one you'd expect, especially in times of crisis.

So that said, what I'd like to see in a zombie survival game is: less zombies. Having too many of them often makes the difference between something eerie and a plain shooter. If you take a look at System Shock 2 as reference, you'll see that there were few "zombies" but that their psychological impact was more important.
Some games focus on fast zombies, the idea being that you need to find quick shelter to survive the encounter, or keep your cool and overpower them through bullets. It works, but let's try something else. Others focus on slow "tough" zombies, that everyone can ignore, but somehow choose to fight.
I'd like to see a game where zombies are not particularly tough or fast, but unexpected. You don't want to encounter them, because it means you'll have fewer bullets.
Zombies should have places they hang about, and reasons to do so. They may all be "eat flesh" and all, but they are still standing and roaming about. Flesh out their personality: are they "surviving" on instincts? thirst? What makes them tick?

One thing I'd really like for such MMOs is the idea of events.
Thing of this: The game has been up for 10 days, by now, players are settling in, have found ways to adapt, they have routes they've cleaned up, supply caches they've taken from, and they are starting to communicate with one another. From then on, the game can quickly go downhill, boring so to speak. Time to do something horrible:
- Create an upheaval of zombies in a specific base and give them an objective (for some reason, they are moving west). See how players respond to this menace and adapt to this change in their ecosystem. With so many caches no longer available, how can survive hordes of zombies?
- Find a few people on the roguish side. Give them a reason to "spread the virus": give them a means to turn more and more zombies and lure them towards specific objectives. Allow the Rogues to use zombies as a means to further increase their wealth and cleanup other survivors' nest. Yes, this is evil, but you can be sure there would be men to take advantage of these situations.
- Things have been hard on the players, and the world is a more dangerous place. Food is extremely scarce, and people are losing this war. Give them hope, give them a means to eradicate masses if they reach an area, say, a science labs that's been operating and have a limited supply of a toxin that burns dead flesh.

I think a lot of the fun an MMO could generate would be in the ability of its developers to make it evolve with simple features that aren't part of the original product, but can be fired when deemed appropriate. Having a strict set of metrics to track when that moment actually makes sense would be necessary, of course.

#12 hupsilardee   Members   -  Reputation: 486

Like
2Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 02:50 PM

- Colossal map.
- Hunger/thirst simulation
- 10-50 players per server. Incentivise sticking together in smallish groups, but not too large. Battle other groups to get their resources
- Guns and ammo are rare and valuable
- Fast zombies, slow zombies, large zombies, small zombies, zombie dogs, zombie fish...
- Motor vehicles, but also bicycles, horses, rowboats.
- Make fuel a (valuable) commodity
- Build a fortress and craft items (traps, explosives, weapons even) from stuff
- Make it winnable (maybe make one game mode winnable) Eg - "the chopper arrives in 10 days, survive until then", or "the zombies spawn at the evil pentagrams scattered about the map, visit and destroy these to win" - forces players to explore the map.

#13 Orymus3   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 8964

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 04:22 PM

- Make it winnable (maybe make one game mode winnable) Eg - "the chopper arrives in 10 days, survive until then", or "the zombies spawn at the evil pentagrams scattered about the map, visit and destroy these to win" - forces players to explore the map.

Like, boost a character, win the game, repeat with a new character (another survivor) but gets a bonus for how many times you've "completed" the game?
I can see something interesting in that, kinda goes back to the idea of having a fun game LOOP.

#14 dtg108   Members   -  Reputation: 394

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 08:20 PM

Thanks guys, keep ti coming!

#15 dakota.potts   Members   -  Reputation: 455

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:24 PM

I touched in another thread about factionalization, improvisation, more realistic weapon scenarios, and things of that nature. Focus on implementing a realistic health, combat, thirst/hunger, and human interaction (ie. the consequences of killing somebody) and make the gameplay solid.

#16 dakota.potts   Members   -  Reputation: 455

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 22 November 2012 - 11:52 PM

I touched in another thread about factionalization, improvisation, more realistic weapon scenarios, and things of that nature. Focus on implementing a realistic health, combat, thirst/hunger, and human interaction (ie. the consequences of killing somebody) and make the gameplay solid. Also, as a zombie nerd and manager of a family run zombie company, I feel safe in saying that us zombie fans want to be able to hole up and make a fortification. We want to be able to make harrowing supply runs, drag our wounded back, post lookouts (with long range weapons of some sort), and when our system inevitably fails, we want the satisfaction of a last stand against the zombies where we use everything we've got with massive losses on both sides. For me, part of the thrill is stocking up the weapons, explosives, manpower (etc. etc.) to let it all rip at once before I go down.

That, and any kind of experimentation is a plus. You're a hobbyist, right? Fresh out of the market with no job to lose or no fans to disappoint. If you're in it for the passion like most of us, there won't be any loss from a bad experiment, and you can have a lot of fun with it.

#17 hupsilardee   Members   -  Reputation: 486

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 23 November 2012 - 07:38 PM

Looks like my last post was fairly well appreciated so here are some more suggestions

- Zombie body parts come off. Can't think of any games that do this even though it would be fairly easy to implement.
- Auto turrets that need to be repaired and reloaded
- Lots of traps! Mines, beartraps, barbed wire, razor wire, pits/trenches with spikes at the bottom, Star Wars Ewok style falling/swinging logs. (Rolling logs off an elevated position to crush enemies is in both Crysis and Oblivion, and probably more)
- Stealthy weapons so I don't alert nearby zombies (and marauding players that want to get their dirty mitts on my ammo). Crossbows, throwing knives, ninja stars.
- Samurai swords and chainsaws, obviously, and maybe some blunt weapons: sledgehammers, baseball bats (with or without spikes), crowbars
- Sniping from rooftops. Love sniping, in any game.
- Exploding barrels. Every good game ever in the history of gaming has exploding barrels. (half life. crysis1+2. etc). Is this going to be a good game? Yes. Thus according to theorem 2.2, the game will contain exploding barrels. As a fun twist, make them indistinguishable from normal barrels.

Wow I have been in quite a creative mood this last week! (Or perhaps a destructive mood ;))

#18 dtg108   Members   -  Reputation: 394

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 23 November 2012 - 07:42 PM

I touched in another thread about factionalization, improvisation, more realistic weapon scenarios, and things of that nature. Focus on implementing a realistic health, combat, thirst/hunger, and human interaction (ie. the consequences of killing somebody) and make the gameplay solid. Also, as a zombie nerd and manager of a family run zombie company, I feel safe in saying that us zombie fans want to be able to hole up and make a fortification. We want to be able to make harrowing supply runs, drag our wounded back, post lookouts (with long range weapons of some sort), and when our system inevitably fails, we want the satisfaction of a last stand against the zombies where we use everything we've got with massive losses on both sides. For me, part of the thrill is stocking up the weapons, explosives, manpower (etc. etc.) to let it all rip at once before I go down.

All I have to say is: yes.

#19 dtg108   Members   -  Reputation: 394

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 23 November 2012 - 07:51 PM

Hey, hupsilardee, I'll tell you some features from your list that we were going to add already:

- Stealthy weapons so I don't alert nearby zombies (and marauding players that want to get their dirty mitts on my ammo). Crossbows, throwing knives, ninja stars.
- Samurai swords and chainsaws, obviously, and maybe some blunt weapons: sledgehammers, baseball bats (with or without spikes), crowbars
- Sniping from rooftops. Love sniping, in any game.


Here are your brilliant ideas that I didn't think about adding that I will add:

- Exploding barrels. Every good game ever in the history of gaming has exploding barrels. (half life. crysis1+2. etc). Is this going to be a good game? Yes. Thus according to theorem 2.2, the game will contain exploding barrels. As a fun twist, make them indistinguishable from normal barrels.

- Zombie body parts come off. Can't think of any games that do this even though it would be fairly easy to implement.
- Auto turrets that need to be repaired and reloaded
- Lots of traps! Mines, beartraps, barbed wire, razor wire, pits/trenches with spikes at the bottom, Star Wars Ewok style falling/swinging logs. (Rolling logs off an elevated position to crush enemies is in both Crysis and Oblivion, and probably more)

Thanks, and keep sending ideads!

#20 Mratthew   Members   -  Reputation: 1540

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 23 November 2012 - 08:59 PM

You should make a Black Friday game ;D no need for zombies. Surviving a store is scary enough on Black Friday.

Have you played Left 4 Dead? I'd say it sets the bar for zombie combat. Plenty of dismemberment there. However realistic weapons use here could be interesting (since you're looking to simulate).

You should consider the use of zombies as well, being able to trap them "alive" and use them as weapons against other dangerous survivors could be interesting. The idea treads on some grey area but I've never seen this done in a zombie story (short of necromancers I suppose).




Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS