Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

breakout objects


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
6 replies to this topic

#1 phil67rpg   Members   -  Reputation: 767

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 06 December 2012 - 10:48 PM

I am brushing up on my c++ and object oriented programming skills. I just want to know if my objects are in the right order.
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

class Breakout
{
private:
	int bricks;
	int paddle;
	int ball;
public:
	void draw_bricks();
	void draw_paddle();
	void draw_ball();
	void move_ball();
	void move_paddle();
	void brick_collision();
	void paddle_collision();
};

void Breakout::draw_bricks()
{
	cout << "Draw Bricks" << endl;
}

void Breakout::draw_paddle()
{
	cout << "Draw Paddle" << endl;
}

void Breakout::draw_ball()
{
	cout << "Draw Ball" << endl;
}

void Breakout::move_ball()
{
	cout << "Move Ball" << endl;
}

void Breakout::move_paddle()
{
	cout << "Move Paddle" << endl;
}

void Breakout::brick_collision()
{
	cout << "Brick Collision" << endl;
}

void Breakout::paddle_collision()
{
	cout << "Paddle Collision" << endl;
}

int main()
{
	Breakout bricks;
	bricks.draw_bricks();
	bricks.draw_paddle();
	bricks.draw_ball();
	bricks.move_ball();
	bricks.move_paddle();
	bricks.brick_collision();
	bricks.paddle_collision();
	return 0;
}


Sponsor:

#2 solipcoder   Members   -  Reputation: 300

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 07 December 2012 - 03:10 AM

I don't understand the question. The order of what exactly? Order rarely matters.

#3 deathwearer   Members   -  Reputation: 367

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 07 December 2012 - 08:05 AM

The object order doesn't matter. It's personal, put them in the order you find the most logical/important.

I tend to put the most important ones at the top. The most used one or the most critical one.

#4 BaneTrapper   Members   -  Reputation: 1202

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 07 December 2012 - 09:48 AM

int main()
{
	Breakout bricks;
	bricks.draw_bricks();
	bricks.draw_paddle();
	bricks.draw_ball();
	bricks.move_ball();
	bricks.move_paddle();
	bricks.brick_collision();
	bricks.paddle_collision();
	return 0;
}

What i want to ask is, if you call (bricks.move_ball(), bricks.move_paddle()) and then check collision and it turns "Oh they collided" next loop comes, you draw that wrong looking frame.

With that code id put it like this
    Breakout bricks;
    bricks.move_ball();
    bricks.move_paddle();
    bricks.brick_collision();
    bricks.paddle_collision();
    bricks.draw_bricks();
    bricks.draw_paddle();
    bricks.draw_ball();
    return 0;

But it depends how your functions are made, in my code i make it this way
namespace en
{
    enum
    {
	    n_collision = 1,
	    y_collision = 2
    };
};

void check_for_valid_position()
{
//Setup position for next movement for ball
int ball_new_x = ball_position_x + ball_velocity_x,
    ball_new_y = ball_position_y + ball_velocity_y;

//Check if the balls new position is valid
if(check_collision(ball_new_x, ball_new_y) == en::y_collision)
// If the new position is invalid reverse ball_velocity x and y
    { /* bounce ball from the object */ }
else
// If the new position is valid, we apply it
    { ball_position_x = ball_new_x; ball_position_y = ball_new_y; }
}
The reason behind this is so i don't split ball_move() and ball_collision().
For exzample :
ball_move() moves ball for 5 pixels
ball_colision() detects that's invalid, and ball_collision now most do ball_move() job(move the ball - 5 pixels).

Edited by BaneTrapper, 07 December 2012 - 09:56 AM.

Current projects:
The Wanderer, 2d turn based rpg style game

www.gamedev.net/topic/641117-check-up-the-wanderer/


#5 Álvaro   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 13326

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 07 December 2012 - 09:51 AM

I just want to know if my objects are in the right order.


There is only one object in your code...

#6 Cdrandin   Members   -  Reputation: 443

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:03 AM

You could have an object for your ball, paddle, and bricks, but I guess it's preference as to how you do it. OOP is extremely useful and powerful so my suggest is to make more obejcts.

#7 BCullis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 1813

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 07 December 2012 - 11:29 AM

Just to add on to what Alvaro is bringing up: you're not actually using Object Oriented programming. You've made a class, but it's just a container for strictly procedural code. Also, as your game doesn't loop, it'll be over immediately.

A helpful heuristic for object oriented design is the "paragraph model". If you were to sit down and write out how your game works (what the code does, or what happens while playing the game) you'd find that most of the time, your objects would be the nouns in the sentences, the verbs would be your object's methods, and adjectives define additional properties of your objects. As an example:

"When the ball collides with the paddle, it bounces back in the other direction"

Already I could make an argument for a ball class, a paddle class, and two methods for ball could be Ball::Collide() and Ball::Bounce(). Though my experience tells me that you could simplify the design and make Bounce() just an internal method call inside Collide() that defines how you react to a collision.

Edited by BCullis, 07 December 2012 - 11:32 AM.

Hazard Pay :: FPS/RTS in SharpDX
DeviantArt :: Because right-brain needs love too




Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS