Need Some Input on School and Computer Science
#1 Members - Reputation: 594
Posted 11 December 2012 - 03:54 PM
The reason I'm writing this post is that I'm honestly confused, and have few people to go to about this. I'd like to switch my major to either math or physics. But anytime I say that to someone, they ask that horrible question: "How are you going to get a job?" The consensus is that math and physics majors either teach, or go to graduate school. Neither appeals to me.
Personally, I'd like to seek education that I really believe is meaningful. I don't want to worry about whether it'll get me a job or not, because I think there's more to life than making sure you've got enough money to keep your Netflix account active. What would excite me is being able to work at an innovative or interesting new company, even if it doesn't make a lot of money. If I can't find one, I'll try my best to start one.
But isn't that a bit unrealistic? I'm worried I might be biting off more than I can chew. Most of the interesting companies I'd like to work for, that are in Robotics or working with NASA on something, seem impossibly out of reach. I'm not going to Carnegie Mellon, or MIT like the other thouands of people applying to them every day.
I don't want to work at a "good" job that pays the bills and suffices, but I don't want to end up even worse off because I aimed too far and completely missed. I'd just like to do something exciting and challenging with my life. Everything else is in the background.
Does anyone have any input? Anything at all is fine. So far I've just been thinking about this on my own.
#2 Crossbones+ - Reputation: 3558
Posted 11 December 2012 - 04:20 PM
Why do you dislike computer science classes? It might be important. Your post implies you do not find them meaningful... but you just can't make this stuff up. I didn't know much about graphs until my first computer science year since my self-learning process didn't really find many uses for them, and now I find them pretty cool and relevant.
Well, yeah, it's true that you are on average disadvantaged against MIT students and that's a fact of life, but that doesn't mean it's hopeless. You should start building some sort of portfolio of personal projects (related to robotics or relevant programming, of course) if you haven't already because when you start in the field you'll have zero work experience and showing your motivation and drive could make the difference between getting hired and, well, not. You can make up for not going to a prestige college...But isn't that a bit unrealistic? I'm worried I might be biting off more than I can chew. Most of the interesting companies I'd like to work for, that are in Robotics or working with NASA on something, seem impossibly out of reach. I'm not going to Carnegie Mellon, or MIT like the other thouands of people applying to them every day.
In any case, I suggest always having some sort of backup plan, because getting stuck in the wheels of bureaucracy sucks.
Reading over my post again, this all feels like very generic advice.. sorry.
#4 Senior Moderators - Reputation: 4749
Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:15 PM
QFE.If you like computer science, do lots of it on your own time.
Attending computer science courses does not a competent programmer create.
I attended a 3rd-rate private school - one which dissolved their CS department about a year after I graduated. That didn't seem to have a negative effect on my job search, and by dint of a lot of computer science work on my own time, I'd hazard my skill levels upon graduation were on par with graduates from the prestigious tech schools.Most of the interesting companies I'd like to work for, that are in Robotics or working with NASA on something, seem impossibly out of reach. I'm not going to Carnegie Mellon, or MIT like the other thouands of people applying to them every day.
Tristam MacDonald - SDE @ Amazon - swiftcoding [Need to sync your files via the cloud? | Need affordable web hosting?]
#5 Members - Reputation: 170
Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:19 PM
Once you graduate it's far more important what you can actually do than where you went to school. I would even go so far as to say that the school is almost irrelevant, provided you can demonstrate your knowledge. My Uncle works as a DBA and his degree is in Journalism. I've also seen in Job postings for programmers where a degree in Math was listed as acceptable for the position.
If you haven't seen it yet, you might check out Udacity.com (Lol this is probably the 5th time in a week I've recommended this site, I'm starting to sound like a broken record). They have some very cool classes, like programming a robotic car. It's also hands down the best experience I've had learning computer science.
The most important thing I've learned in school is becoming responsible for my own learning. I don't depend on the professors for hardly anything unless I just run into a wall. I view them more as facilitators.
In the end, do what feels right, because that means it probably is. If that means going for physics or mathematics then do it. Who cares what others think, they aren't you.
#6 Members - Reputation: 620
Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:49 PM
#7 Members - Reputation: 2763
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:19 PM
If you believe those programs. would be a Better fit, and you can dedicate yourself to learning some computer science on your own, and develop a portfolio, its a path that's both without merit.
#8 Moderator* - Reputation: 5410
Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:42 PM
If you're going to do that though (switch to math or physics but still want a computer sciencey job), listen to Oberon_Command and do lots of computer science stuff on your own time. And if you decide to major in computer science anyway, listen to Oberon_Command and do lots of computer science stuff on your own time. A degree is worthless without skills to employ.
#9 Members - Reputation: 151
Posted 13 December 2012 - 02:42 AM
#10 Members - Reputation: 594
Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:43 PM
I'm sorta going through the same thing. Most of the CS classes at my university aren't so much badly taught as they are just irrelevant. While I'm sure I could learn a lot from understanding FORTRAN, I don't exactly want to spend my time learning it since I probably will never use it. Which is why I'm not getting a CS degree, I'm actually going for a double major with aerospace engineering and physics. I've already worked on a group project where we designed an autopilot program for a little rc airplane, so it's not like I'm not learning useful programming skills by not taking those CS classes. My aunt is a senior developer at her job, she's one of those old school hackers that can do almost anything with a computer, but her degree is in biology! That said, I'm sure having a CS degree will open more doors than a degree in biology unless you can prove that you have the skills.
If my school offered an Aerospace and Engineering major, I'd have dropped CS without a slight hesitation. I guess it depends what you want to do, but you might be better off just choosing one major in the long run. Those are two intensive fields of study
#11 Members - Reputation: 2763
Posted 13 December 2012 - 04:56 PM
While I'm sure I could learn a lot from understanding FORTRAN, I don't exactly want to spend my time learning it since I probably will never use it.
While the sentiment is understandably common, be very careful of falling into the trap of believing that a particular approach or technology makes everything you learn irrelevent. In fact, it could just as easily be argued that using 'irrelevent' technologies as learning tools is a benefit, because your employer won't have to tear down the crappy coding habits you learned in the language de jour before they can start building your skills back up correctly.
Saying you can't build software because your school taught you fortran (or Java, or python, or etc.) is like a carpenter saying he can't build a house because his school only taught him how to use ball-peen hammers instead of the usual claw-style hammer.
Yes, you need to be familiar with the tools people are hiring for, but that's your job to learn them -- your school's job is to make you a computer scientist, not even to make you a programmer, much less a <language X> programmer.
#12 Members - Reputation: 151
Posted 14 December 2012 - 12:01 AM
Ya, Aerospace is definitely a fun field. And I know, everyone has told me just how hard it will be to double major. But it's a fairly common occurrence at my uni to double up with those two, and there's even a guy a year ahead of me doing just the same thing, and another doubling with AE and math. Plus the department heads really work together to make it as easy as possible. I'm not even gonna lie, it's incredibly difficult at times, but I enjoy the challenge.If my school offered an Aerospace and Engineering major, I'd have dropped CS without a slight hesitation. I guess it depends what you want to do, but you might be better off just choosing one major in the long run. Those are two intensive fields of study
And Ravyne, I definitely understand what you're saying. I guess you can't code in fortran in any language if you can't code in fortran to begin with. All the same, it's not something I feel like knowing it would help me much. And if a music theory professor can teach you music theory using any instrument, whether it's a old clavichord or a modern electronic synthesizer, then why doesn't the same apply for computer science?
#13 Members - Reputation: 133
Posted 16 December 2012 - 01:16 PM
Edited by mikeishere, 16 December 2012 - 01:19 PM.






