My time step is fixed, but...
Members - Reputation: 777
Posted 29 January 2013 - 06:51 AM
If I put it inside, it means that I may potentially call the animation update multiple times before I render it - as calculating skeleton poses isn't cheap, this seems redundant if the renderer is only drawing the last calculated pose. If I put it outside the while loop, I only calculate the skeleton poses once (with the correct delta), but it means no matter what speed my 'physics' step is, the animation will always render at the best frame rate - this is also ok I guess, but it doesn't feel right. If it goes outside the loop and uses the delta calculated by the loop, then what sort of things are meant to actually go inside the loop?
Crossbones+ - Reputation: 8001
Posted 29 January 2013 - 07:46 AM
this is also ok I guess, but it doesn't feel right
But it is the right way. The physics engine needs to integrate over time, this is done by an approximation of an integral. Smaller steps will result in a better approximation, and therefore more stable behaviour. Animation on the other hand is just an interpolation between given points, your are able to define the exact interpolation at every time.
Edited by Ashaman73, 29 January 2013 - 07:48 AM.
My game: Gnoblins
Developer journal about Gnoblins
Small goodies: Simple alpha transparency in deferred shader
Moderators - Reputation: 31938
Posted 29 January 2013 - 08:09 AM
There's multiple parts to animation -
* choosing what animations are to be layered together at what time, is gameplay code.
* IK and rag-doll are probably physics code.
* Actually evaluating the animation layers to get a posed skeleton is rendering code (and is deterministic; you shouldn't need a dt here to advance a simulation).
* Using a skeleton to skin/render a mesh is rendering code.
You could put the first two in your fixed-step frame loop, and the bottom two in the rendering loop.
Edited by Hodgman, 29 January 2013 - 08:09 AM.