Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

What game type do you prefer and why?


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
24 replies to this topic

Poll: What game type and style do you prefer? (75 member(s) have cast votes)

What game type do you prefer?

  1. Sandbox (35 votes [12.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.20%

  2. Roguelike (17 votes [5.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.92%

  3. Hack n' Slash (23 votes [8.01%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.01%

  4. RTS (31 votes [10.80%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.80%

  5. MMORPG (16 votes [5.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.57%

  6. Life Simulator (7 votes [2.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.44%

  7. Shooter (25 votes [8.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.71%

  8. As long as it has action... (11 votes [3.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.83%

  9. Other - Try to comment about what you prefer. (7 votes [2.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.44%

  10. Strategy (32 votes [11.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.15%

  11. Sports (4 votes [1.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.39%

  12. Racing (11 votes [3.83%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.83%

  13. Action/Adenture (27 votes [9.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.41%

  14. RPG/Turnbased (33 votes [11.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.50%

  15. Fighter (8 votes [2.79%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.79%

What game style do you prefer?

  1. 2D (39 votes [15.48%])

    Percentage of vote: 15.48%

  2. 3D (49 votes [19.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 19.44%

  3. Isometric (25 votes [9.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.92%

  4. FirstPerson (31 votes [12.30%])

    Percentage of vote: 12.30%

  5. ThirdPerson (28 votes [11.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.11%

  6. Topdown (25 votes [9.92%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.92%

  7. Sideview (17 votes [6.75%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.75%

  8. Depends on the game (37 votes [14.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.68%

  9. Other - Try to comment about what you prefer. (1 votes [0.40%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.40%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 21 February 2013 - 06:57 PM

What game type do you prefer and why?

 

Please answer on the poll, if you have another result, just say so. You can also say why you picked what you did, or even your second or third option.

 

Come on, we need more voters! Currently over 360 people have visited, but only ~18 comments.

 

Thanks!


Edited by WeNeedFocus, 23 February 2013 - 08:42 AM.


Sponsor:

#2 sunandshadow   Moderators   -  Reputation: 4914

Posted 21 February 2013 - 07:28 PM

Haha - I voted second, and the results say that whoever the first person was we have exactly opposite taste in genres, excluding shooter which neither voted for.  This is not statistically meaningful, just struck me as funny.

 

I voted other for genres - I like plant and animal breeding tycoons/sims, pet monster tactical combat RPGs, adventure games, and time management.  Even of the types I didn't vote for, like sandbox, I like a few, like crafting focused MMOs (Wurm Online, Tale In The Desert) though both of those are a bit to realistic and dark and graphically-poor for my taste.  Or, I've played some campaign games where you get a sandbox to spend your rewards developing in between missions.  Or some MMOs where you get a personal plot of land or house to play with, maybe grow crops there, but it's not really related to the main progression of quests locations.  Same thing for roguelikes - I generally don't like them but I liked Azure Dreams a lot, which is a 3D roguelike with pet monsters.


Edited by sunandshadow, 21 February 2013 - 07:30 PM.

Phone game idea available free to someone who will develop it (Alphadoku game - the only existing phone game of this type is both for windows phone only and awful. PM for details.)


I want to help design a "sandpark" MMO. Optional interactive story with quests and deeply characterized NPCs, plus sandbox elements like player-craftable housing and lots of other crafting. If you are starting a design of this type, please PM me. I also love pet-breeding games.


#3 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 21 February 2013 - 07:32 PM

Well, as it is my poll, I voted first biggrin.png (felt like it!!).

 

I enjoy making games to get better at programming, so I'm going to try to make the communities favorite, and post it on gamedev when it's done. Who knows, it might turn out pretty good.

 

More people should vote and comment, it won't hurt. I carefully read each reply to get your opinion.


Edited by WeNeedFocus, 21 February 2013 - 07:36 PM.


#4 Plethora   Members   -  Reputation: 679

Posted 21 February 2013 - 08:00 PM

Well I voted so felt I should reply.  :)

 

I love roguelikes in general and I also adore Azure Dreams.  I love sandboxy games and anything that gives players the freedom to play in various different ways and still have fun.  I also voted RTS... I honestly don't like them all that much in general... but I played starcraft... a lot, like a real lot, like I was legitimately trying to go pro at it... so I guess I'll always have a soft spot for the RTS genre.

 

For the second part... I'm an old school gamer.  My PS3 and 360 gather dust while I still play games from the late 90s regularly.  I'll always prefer hand drawn 2D graphics to 3d.


I'm working on a game!  It's called "Spellbook Tactics".  I'd love it if you checked it out, offered some feedback, etc.  I am very excited about my progress thus far and confident about future progress as well!

 

http://infinityelephant.wordpress.com


#5 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 21 February 2013 - 08:13 PM

Thanks for taking your time and commenting..

 

Sandbox games are indeed fun, Minecraft is quite popular, and was Terraria, a 2D sandbox game. I once tried making something like Terraria, I can't say it was easy, very frustrating sometimes, but I enjoyed seeing how I progressed each time I debugged the game. But, the main reason why I gave up on my Terraria-Clone was because I couldn't get the collisions to work correctly, it was all fine until I added Jumping and moving at the same time.

I also enjoyed Starcraft and Broodwar back in the day, not to mention that I preordered Hots and am waiting for it. I too prefer 2D over 3D in most genres.

 

Has anyone played the Diablo series? I enjoyed those a lot too..

 

This is something I made a few months ago.. Thought some might be interested: http://www.pokecommunity.com/showthread.php?t=285625

 

 

Does anyone like the idea of making a Dwarf Fortress clone with high quality 32bit png tiles(20x20)?


Edited by WeNeedFocus, 21 February 2013 - 08:25 PM.


#6 MrDaaark   Members   -  Reputation: 3555

Posted 21 February 2013 - 09:43 PM

Does anyone like the idea of making a Dwarf Fortress clone with high quality 32bit png tiles(20x20)?

No.

If you can only describe your game by using the title of someone else's game, followed by the word clone, it doesn't justify it's own existence. I'm sure you are talented on your own, and have something unique to say, that you don't need to waste your time cloning other people's work.

#7 SimonForsman   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 6107

Posted 22 February 2013 - 03:48 AM

I'm missing strategy on that list (not RTS since those tends to be more about micromanaging your units than actual strategy and therefore suck(in my opinion) (Total war is an exception, it rocks).

Nothing beats a good game of Civilization.


I don't suffer from insanity, I'm enjoying every minute of it.
The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!

#8 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 22 February 2013 - 06:55 AM

Does anyone like the idea of making a Dwarf Fortress clone with high quality 32bit png tiles(20x20)?

No.

If you can only describe your game by using the title of someone else's game, followed by the word clone, it doesn't justify it's own existence. I'm sure you are talented on your own, and have something unique to say, that you don't need to waste your time cloning other people's work.

Thanks for the feedback, I do have a game idea, but I liked DF, and thought a more complex version would be nicer. I do have a game idea, and am working on it. /rpg

I'm missing strategy on that list (not RTS since those tends to be more about micromanaging your units than actual strategy and therefore suck(in my opinion) (Total war is an exception, it rocks).

Nothing beats a good game of Civilization.

Added Strategy and a few more.



#9 minus4th   Members   -  Reputation: 587

Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:52 AM

I would have Hack n' Slash/RPG split into two categories. I prefer the traditional turn based RPG style game. I consider Games like Diablo and such to be hack n' slash which in my opinion is not the same as a straight out RPG.

So for my vote it would be a traditional turn based RPG.

*** Why'd you run away? ****** Don't you like my... style***

#10 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 22 February 2013 - 08:58 AM

I would have Hack n' Slash/RPG split into two categories. I prefer the traditional turn based RPG style game. I consider Games like Diablo and such to be hack n' slash which in my opinion is not the same as a straight out RPG.

So for my vote it would be a traditional turn based RPG.

I've added turn based RPG. Currently from the looks of it most of the voters prefer sandbox games, would you prefer 3D, like Minecraft, or 2D, like Terraria?


Edited by WeNeedFocus, 22 February 2013 - 08:58 AM.


#11 minus4th   Members   -  Reputation: 587

Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:05 AM

I've added turn based RPG. Currently from the looks of it most of the voters prefer sandbox games, would you prefer 3D, like Minecraft, or 2D, like Terraria?

I would prefer 2d like Terraria. I don't mind Minecraft though. It has it's charms smile.png

*** Why'd you run away? ****** Don't you like my... style***

#12 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:09 AM

I've added turn based RPG. Currently from the looks of it most of the voters prefer sandbox games, would you prefer 3D, like Minecraft, or 2D, like Terraria?

I would prefer 2d like Terraria. I don't mind Minecraft though. It has it's charms smile.png

I too, prefer Terraria. But for some reason I get bored of Terraria faster..

Btw just want to say it: I refreshed the page and saw the votes go down from 20 to 19, i refreshed again two seconds later and saw the votes go up to 20 again. Knew immediately it was you changing your vote. Just wanted to say



#13 Waterlimon   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2561

Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:15 AM

I dont like 2D for more complex gameplay because i feel it lacks a dimension. Either you cant go around a point without digging/flying, or you cant dig/fly.

Something like DF might be ideal, however i would like to not be blind as to what happens on the level below if i can see 100 units to all directions on the current level... Also i might be able to shoot at any angle on the horizontal plane, but shooting at a vertical angle makes the projectile or whatever just appear on many levels for a vey short time (basically depth would be a "lesser" dimension of some sort)

2D top down - cant dig nor fly

2D side view - dem evil noobs built a giant stone tower in the middle of the world preventing all travel

DF style top down with depth - doibg things that incorporate multiple depth levels is a pain


3D - Itll end up laggy and confusing and with tenth of the features

:c

o3o


#14 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:21 AM

Well I have this 2D sandbox game idea in mind inspired by Terraria. It would be more technological than Terraria, and even though it's 2D, you will be able to go indoors. I can't explain myself very well, but I'm trying to say like a door on the wall in the background that you can enter, and if you do, its like another layer behind the previous one. and it can go a few layers back. It saves alot of space. So Imagine Terraria with like multiple layers of tiles. Good / Bad / Dumb?



#15 Nytegard   Members   -  Reputation: 820

Posted 22 February 2013 - 12:02 PM

Honestly, I'm not a fan of action games.  I prefer more intellectual games such as puzzles & adventures (not action/adventure, that's a completely different genre).  Think Lucas Arts & Sierra games of old, or The Last Express (similar games which are sorely missing from app stores).  I just like to take my time and play on my schedule and not the games.  As for dimensions, I prefer 2D.  I can only play 3D games for so long before I get nauseous and I also tend to find that 3D gameplay is too simplistic for my taste.  (I don't mind 2D gameplay with 3D graphics though).



#16 Servant of the Lord   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 19507

Posted 22 February 2013 - 12:13 PM

Cooperative 3D first-person action-RPGs with some minor platforming in an open-world.

 

Not sandboxes (e.g Minecraft), but open worlds (like the Elder Scrolls games). I'm not opposed to sandbox games, and enjoyed cooperative Minecraft, but I want open worlds because of the more cultivated and designed experience but still allowing exploration and choice. Bonus points if it gives you just enough a sandbox for multiple creative solutions to each problem.


It's perfectly fine to abbreviate my username to 'Servant' rather than copy+pasting it all the time.
All glory be to the Man at the right hand... On David's throne the King will reign, and the Government will rest upon His shoulders. All the earth will see the salvation of God.
Of Stranger Flames - [indie turn-based rpg set in a para-historical French colony] | Indie RPG development journal

[Fly with me on Twitter] [Google+] [My broken website]

[Need web hosting? I personally like A Small Orange]


#17 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 22 February 2013 - 12:49 PM

Honestly, I'm not a fan of action games.  I prefer more intellectual games such as puzzles & adventures (not action/adventure, that's a completely different genre).  Think Lucas Arts & Sierra games of old, or The Last Express (similar games which are sorely missing from app stores).  I just like to take my time and play on my schedule and not the games.  As for dimensions, I prefer 2D.  I can only play 3D games for so long before I get nauseous and I also tend to find that 3D gameplay is too simplistic for my taste.  (I don't mind 2D gameplay with 3D graphics though).

I too prefer 2D, as I might have mentioned before, but I can't say the same for puzzles and adventures. I don't really enjoy them, even if they are more intellectual. As for action/adventure, now that's what I like!

 

 

Cooperative 3D first-person action-RPGs with some minor platforming in an open-world.

 

Not sandboxes (e.g Minecraft), but open worlds (like the Elder Scrolls games). I'm not opposed to sandbox games, and enjoyed cooperative Minecraft, but I want open worlds because of the more cultivated and designed experience but still allowing exploration and choice. Bonus points if it gives you just enough a sandbox for multiple creative solutions to each problem.

Elder Scrolls games are good indeed, by the way, they're developing an Elder Scrolls mmo, I registered for beta... but never got a reply... Anyways I like Minecraft too, but I can't deal with griefers.

 

Thanks for your opinions!



#18 sunandshadow   Moderators   -  Reputation: 4914

Posted 22 February 2013 - 07:01 PM

If we're discussing 2D vs. 3D, I'd like to say that for action games in particular I prefer 2D, for the same reason as Nytegard, that I get motion sickness from some 3D games.  Especially first person ones where there are fast movements required (i.e. action games).  Games like Half-life and Vindictus I just can't play due to nausea, and I had some uncomfortable moments during Zelda: Twilight Princess and Skyrim, though I finished both of those.  (Well, it's not really possible to finish Skyrim, but close enough.)  For most game types I like 2D and 3D equally well, though the 2D has to be high res cartoons/anime, I detest pixel art.  On the other hand for a sandbox game I think 3D is probably a better choice than 2D because it's better suited to user customization and playing a life in a virtual world.


Edited by sunandshadow, 22 February 2013 - 07:03 PM.

Phone game idea available free to someone who will develop it (Alphadoku game - the only existing phone game of this type is both for windows phone only and awful. PM for details.)


I want to help design a "sandpark" MMO. Optional interactive story with quests and deeply characterized NPCs, plus sandbox elements like player-craftable housing and lots of other crafting. If you are starting a design of this type, please PM me. I also love pet-breeding games.


#19 L. Spiro   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 13574

Posted 23 February 2013 - 12:31 AM

You left fighting games off the list.

 

Currently the only game I am playing is Persona 4 Arena.

Why?  Because my coworkers play it.

 

After losing at lunch every day I secretly bought a PlayStation 3 just for that game and trained on my own so that suddenly I could surprise them with my abilities one day.

 

Just like old times… …(Super Smash Bros. Melee and losing to my friends.)

 

 

L. Spiro


It is amazing how often people try to be unique, and yet they are always trying to make others be like them. - L. Spiro 2011
I spent most of my life learning the courage it takes to go out and get what I want. Now that I have it, I am not sure exactly what it is that I want. - L. Spiro 2013
I went to my local Subway once to find some guy yelling at the staff. When someone finally came to take my order and asked, “May I help you?”, I replied, “Yeah, I’ll have one asshole to go.”
L. Spiro Engine: http://lspiroengine.com
L. Spiro Engine Forums: http://lspiroengine.com/forums

#20 WeNeedFocus   Members   -  Reputation: 154

Posted 23 February 2013 - 08:46 AM

First of all, thanks for your comments, and I apologize for a late reply because I was unable to log into my account. 

If we're discussing 2D vs. 3D, I'd like to say that for action games in particular I prefer 2D, for the same reason as Nytegard, that I get motion sickness from some 3D games.  Especially first person ones where there are fast movements required (i.e. action games).  Games like Half-life and Vindictus I just can't play due to nausea, and I had some uncomfortable moments during Zelda: Twilight Princess and Skyrim, though I finished both of those.  (Well, it's not really possible to finish Skyrim, but close enough.)  For most game types I like 2D and 3D equally well, though the 2D has to be high res cartoons/anime, I detest pixel art.  On the other hand for a sandbox game I think 3D is probably a better choice than 2D because it's better suited to user customization and playing a life in a virtual world.

Yes, we are discussing 2Dv3D as well as your favorite game genres. I personally like 2D more than 3D in most games, so I can't agree with most of what you said, especially pixel art. I adore pixel art, but for sandbox games, 3D might be a better choice than 2D because not only does it add an extra dimension to the game, it does make it more of a simulator.

 

 

You left fighting games off the list.

 

Currently the only game I am playing is Persona 4 Arena.

Why?  Because my coworkers play it.

 

After losing at lunch every day I secretly bought a PlayStation 3 just for that game and trained on my own so that suddenly I could surprise them with my abilities one day.

 

Just like old times… …(Super Smash Bros. Melee and losing to my friends.)

 

 

L. Spiro

I added fighting, but I was never really into those games so it didn't come to mind when I was making the poll. But hey, it's a game genre.


Edited by WeNeedFocus, 23 February 2013 - 11:14 AM.





Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS