Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

We're offering banner ads on our site from just $5!

1. Details HERE. 2. GDNet+ Subscriptions HERE. 3. Ad upload HERE.


What to write with now?


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
20 replies to this topic

#1 Havok635   Members   -  Reputation: 122

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 10:43 AM

So since xna is more or less dead now, what is the best next programming language to write with? I mean I'd love to write a game for the xbox but you can't now :/ Any ideas? Thanks in advance



Sponsor:

#2 Jutaris   Members   -  Reputation: 478

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:30 PM

This seems to come up a lot lately, and the sentiment is false. You can still download it right here.

 

Just because they are done updating it does not mean you can't use it. XNA is still a great framework for making Windows games and you CAN still write games for the Xbox.

 

Further, MonoGame exists and is more or less a cross platform port of XNA.


My Site -- My Music  -- My Ramblings -- My Game

 Basic Flying Rules:Try to stay in the middle of the air. Do not go near the edges of it. The edges of the air can be recognized by the appearance of ground, buildings, sea, trees and interstellar space. It is much more difficult to fly there.

Come join us for some friendly game dev discussions over in XNA Chat!


#3 Drilian   Members   -  Reputation: 1025

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:33 PM

To expand on Jutaris' comments, XNA is not DEAD. It's just not being developed anymore.

 

However, everything that XNA has done in the past (PC/Xbox/Windows Phone 7 games), you can STILL DO. You can still get XNA, you can still write games with it, you can still release those games on any of the ever-supported platforms.

 

All "XNA is dead" really means, as it's stated is that Microsoft is no longer planning new revisions of it, so we're stuck with XNA 4.0 unless they change their minds.



#4 Havok635   Members   -  Reputation: 122

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:41 PM

Hey thanks for the replies. This is good to hear because I love working with C#, just codes friendlier than C++ in my opinion. Plus I HATE pointers. Anyway even though I can still write with it I cant submit anything to the xbox indie market, so I can develop but not potentially sell. Anything on that?



#5 Drilian   Members   -  Reputation: 1025

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:58 PM

You need to sign up for a creator's club account to be able to submit to Xbox Live Indie Games. It's $99/year, but it's what allows you to develop and release on the Xbox.

 

People are still releasing XBLIGs, so it's definitely not disabled :)



#6 LordRhys   Members   -  Reputation: 364

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 01:00 PM

It's Progress, go back to 2007 the rave was Managed DirectX using C# and DirectX 9, MS then formalized that with XNA making it easier to write managed DirectX code, we're now in the space age of Windows 8, Metro UI, Tablets etc.. and MS will come up with some new way to use Managed code with DirectX 11, probably get announced after XBOX 720 has been finalized. Although it is strange that they would announce dropping support before announcing the new methodology, but of Course what we're all discussing is leaked info by some DIrectX MVP's and not official MS Headlines.



#7 Jutaris   Members   -  Reputation: 478

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 01:13 PM

 Firstly, yeah, you still can. I haven't seen anything, nor does the creators club site in any way indicate that XBLIG submissions are no longer being accepted. If you have a link showing something to the contrary, I'd love to see it.

 

Now, if you're in an unsupported region, don't have the cash for a membership, or are simply wary of the profitability of the XBLIG portal, well, those are all valid concerns.

 

Don't let them stop you from using XNA though. There's are tons of other selling opportunities both on Windows or on other platforms (via MonoGame or Xamarin for iOS and/or Android). Sites like The Humble Store, Desura, Gamers Gate... You can sell it for yourself.

 

But before you think about all that stuff, start making your game :)


My Site -- My Music  -- My Ramblings -- My Game

 Basic Flying Rules:Try to stay in the middle of the air. Do not go near the edges of it. The edges of the air can be recognized by the appearance of ground, buildings, sea, trees and interstellar space. It is much more difficult to fly there.

Come join us for some friendly game dev discussions over in XNA Chat!


#8 Havok635   Members   -  Reputation: 122

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 03:15 PM

But before you think about all that stuff, start making your game

lol fair enough. :P Just don't want to write a game then have to recode the entire thing in a new language.

And I tried for 4 months now to join the creators club but it just sites there loading for eternity. I can't sign up :/



#9 Anri   Members   -  Reputation: 597

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 03:45 PM

If you are currently using C# and XNA, and comfortable, then stick with it.  I wouldn't worry until its no longer used for the XBox.

 

Push comes to shove, for making money from your games, you could switch to Java and Android.  C# and Java are very similar and if you are at the point where you are making money from your games then learning the Android side shouldn't be a problem.



#10 NightCreature83   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2938

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 04:49 PM

Hey thanks for the replies. This is good to hear because I love working with C#, just codes friendlier than C++ in my opinion. Plus I HATE pointers. Anyway even though I can still write with it I cant submit anything to the xbox indie market, so I can develop but not potentially sell. Anything on that?

You realise that they have probably scheduled to announce there next console right? And that if they are allowing development for it, it will probably take the approach that WP8 has taken, C++/CLI combined with D3D. So in effect they already have announce the new way of doing this. And this really shouldn't surprise you, as with X360 the next version will most likely run a stripped down version of Windows in the background as OS. And seeing that they are moving to one kernel rules all devices it is very likely that the next version is Windows 8 based.
Worked on titles: CMR:DiRT2, DiRT 3, DiRT: Showdown, GRID 2, Mad Max

#11 Jason Z   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5164

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 06:10 PM

Hey thanks for the replies. This is good to hear because I love working with C#, just codes friendlier than C++ in my opinion. Plus I HATE pointers. Anyway even though I can still write with it I cant submit anything to the xbox indie market, so I can develop but not potentially sell. Anything on that?

You realise that they have probably scheduled to announce there next console right? And that if they are allowing development for it, it will probably take the approach that WP8 has taken, C++/CLI combined with D3D. So in effect they already have announce the new way of doing this. And this really shouldn't surprise you, as with X360 the next version will most likely run a stripped down version of Windows in the background as OS. And seeing that they are moving to one kernel rules all devices it is very likely that the next version is Windows 8 based.

You can use C# on WP8 - why would you think this won't be possible on the next Xbox?  Of course, nobody knows except Microsoft at the moment, but I wouldn't expect them to limit development to be only based on C++.  If anything, Win8 shows that there is a plethora of supported languages to use, so I wouldn't be too worried about losing C# support.



#12 PoliticalChaos   Members   -  Reputation: 151

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 February 2013 - 08:20 PM

I'd recommend trying out Unity. http://unity3d.com/



#13 NightCreature83   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2938

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 27 February 2013 - 02:09 AM

 

Hey thanks for the replies. This is good to hear because I love working with C#, just codes friendlier than C++ in my opinion. Plus I HATE pointers. Anyway even though I can still write with it I cant submit anything to the xbox indie market, so I can develop but not potentially sell. Anything on that?

You realise that they have probably scheduled to announce there next console right? And that if they are allowing development for it, it will probably take the approach that WP8 has taken, C++/CLI combined with D3D. So in effect they already have announce the new way of doing this. And this really shouldn't surprise you, as with X360 the next version will most likely run a stripped down version of Windows in the background as OS. And seeing that they are moving to one kernel rules all devices it is very likely that the next version is Windows 8 based.

You can use C# on WP8 - why would you think this won't be possible on the next Xbox?  Of course, nobody knows except Microsoft at the moment, but I wouldn't expect them to limit development to be only based on C++.  If anything, Win8 shows that there is a plethora of supported languages to use, so I wouldn't be too worried about losing C# support.

What I was meaning is that the only way to interact with D3D to do any real graphically rendering from C# is through a native component, and you can bet that that's C++/CLI to do the interop with the C# application. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsphone/develop/jj662943%28v=vs.105%29.aspx#BKMK_NativeonlyApplications


 


Worked on titles: CMR:DiRT2, DiRT 3, DiRT: Showdown, GRID 2, Mad Max

#14 Jason Z   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5164

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 27 February 2013 - 09:28 AM

What I was meaning is that the only way to interact with D3D to do any real graphically rendering from C# is through a native component, and you can bet that that's C++/CLI to do the interop with the C# application. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windowsphone/develop/jj662943%28v=vs.105%29.aspx#BKMK_NativeonlyApplications

Is that different than XNA?  I don't think so - XNA is just a managed library written over the native interfaces to use the D3D COM based interfaces.

 

Even so, what is wrong with using something like SharpDX or SlimDX to use the API???



#15 Havok635   Members   -  Reputation: 122

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 27 February 2013 - 11:57 AM

Well risking sounding ignorant, I dont know what xna operates through or whatever. I haven't programmed in really a year so I'm rusty. I would just like to know if I should really consider relearning c++ or I can stick with what I know with c#. I've already been considering java for my first game since it will be server heavy. Again thank you all though for your replies. Its good to learn about all this stuff and its relationships



#16 Jason Z   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5164

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 27 February 2013 - 01:54 PM

Well risking sounding ignorant, I dont know what xna operates through or whatever. I haven't programmed in really a year so I'm rusty. I would just like to know if I should really consider relearning c++ or I can stick with what I know with c#. I've already been considering java for my first game since it will be server heavy. Again thank you all though for your replies. Its good to learn about all this stuff and its relationships

You can do either one - the option is yours.  There are direct bindings to the 3D APIs from C++, and there are also libraries available that make this functionality available from C# too.  There is not a big penalty for sticking with C#, and you always have the option to fall back to C++.



#17 Corvwyn   Members   -  Reputation: 331

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 28 February 2013 - 03:40 AM

Disclaimer: I haven't really tried XNA, so some of my assumptions may be wrong. I code in C++/DirectX 11 myself.

 

Microsoft seem to be focusing on C++ a lot lately, especially the new C++11 standard. I don't know how this ties into Xbox 720 yet, but we might just find out in April.

 

Two devs from XNA/DirectX have written a library called DirectX toolkit. It contains a lot of the functionality from XNA (http://directxtk.codeplex.com/).

 

With the new C++11 standard I feel that C++ has become easier and safer to use. You don't need to use the old-style pointers, you can just use unique_ptr or shared_ptr .There are a lot of videos available on channel9 about the new features. The ones from Herb Sutter are particularily good. Here are two intro videos in case you're interested:

 

Bjarne Stroustrup: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/GoingNative-2012/Keynote-Bjarne-Stroustrup-Cpp11-Style and

Herb Sutter: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/GoingNative-2012/C-11-VC-11-and-Beyond


Edited by Corvwyn, 28 February 2013 - 05:42 AM.


#18 blueshogun96   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 1054

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 28 February 2013 - 04:29 AM

Hey thanks for the replies. This is good to hear because I love working with C#, just codes friendlier than C++ in my opinion. Plus I HATE pointers. Anyway even though I can still write with it I cant submit anything to the xbox indie market, so I can develop but not potentially sell. Anything on that?

 

If C# is your cup of tea, there's always Managed DirectX.  I personally don't like C#, so I've never used it, but I've seen some interesting things evolve from it.  And even though Microsoft doesn't have any updates planned for it, that doesn't mean it's useless either.  It's possible that there isn't anything relavent to add to it, or their man power is being directed elsewhere to make something better than XNA. happy.png

 

I'm curious, what do you have against pointers?  


Follow Shogun3D on the official website: http://shogun3d.net

 

blogger.png twitter.png tumblr_32.png facebook.png

 

"Yo mama so fat, she can't be frustum culled." - yoshi_lol


#19 Havok635   Members   -  Reputation: 122

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 28 February 2013 - 01:44 PM

Disclaimer: I haven't really tried XNA, so some of my assumptions may be wrong. I code in C++/DirectX 11 myself.

 

Microsoft seem to be focusing on C++ a lot lately, especially the new C++11 standard. I don't know how this ties into Xbox 720 yet, but we might just find out in April.

 

Two devs from XNA/DirectX have written a library called DirectX toolkit. It contains a lot of the functionality from XNA (http://directxtk.codeplex.com/).

 

With the new C++11 standard I feel that C++ has become easier and safer to use. You don't need to use the old-style pointers, you can just use unique_ptr or shared_ptr .There are a lot of videos available on channel9 about the new features. The ones from Herb Sutter are particularily good. Here are two intro videos in case you're interested:

 

Bjarne Stroustrup: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/GoingNative-2012/Keynote-Bjarne-Stroustrup-Cpp11-Style and

Herb Sutter: http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/GoingNative-2012/C-11-VC-11-and-Beyond

Hey thanks for pointing out that stuff on C++, it might make going back to it a little less painless.

 

I'm curious, what do you have against pointers?

Well maybe its because I never truely had a decent grasp on the concept, but I always seem to get undesired results with them. Values and exceptions all over the place. I guess I just like how C# makes errors less likely. And I can return an array without haveing to use a pointer which again I seem to have error issues with

 

I'm mostly self taught btw, so by no means do I consider myself a professional programmer



#20 blueshogun96   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 1054

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 28 February 2013 - 02:23 PM

^ I'm also self taught (with the exception of a C++ class I took in high school, which didn't even touch pointers), so I guess I understand that.  You probably got off on the wrong foot with pointers.  For me, pointers are an absolute must and I'd go crazy without them.  Sometimes they can get confusing (especially double pointers).  If they are a problem, then I guess I'd recommend C++11 and concur with Corvwyn.

 

I've gotten used to managing pointers manually (in pure C) to the point where I think nothing of it.  

 

Shogun


Edited by blueshogun96, 28 February 2013 - 02:23 PM.

Follow Shogun3D on the official website: http://shogun3d.net

 

blogger.png twitter.png tumblr_32.png facebook.png

 

"Yo mama so fat, she can't be frustum culled." - yoshi_lol





Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS