Negative programmer reaction of the Code.org Video

Started by
75 comments, last by cr88192 11 years, 1 month ago
I will admit I have not read the entire thread. Though just about my whole family is or has been a teacher. I have talked to most of them yesterday and tonight getting their opinion. I found that EVERY single one of them said they would be ALL FOR a Computer Science or programming course being required. They each said they believed it would help with problem solving and more. I'm the only one in my family who is even into programming and Computer Science. So they don't know a lot about it. They just understand it does require problem solvin and they felt that requiring students would only help. My mom, who is recognized by the state of Texas as being a very good educator for her grade level, said she can't believe it is not required yet and says it makes her mad that classes like that aren't required!

I just wanted to put that in...
Advertisement

Today, on top of that, every child is given their own personal laptop.
N.B. this is for public schools -- paid private schools have it even better and/or can demand students to bring their own iPad.

Which depresses me even more - even better? They can neither program, type, nor do handwriting with it.

You can do all of the above with an ipad. Admittedly the typing won't be great (true for any tablet) but add a bluetooth keyboard and you're sweet.

I use my ipad for taking handwritten notes at work every day.

The poor kids can't even use a decent touch keyboard like Swype! (Plus the way it's anticompetitive, catering to just one company - rather than "must have a laptop" it's every school saying "must have a Samsung laptop".)

Whilst I wouldn't go as far as saying people should learn in a GUI-less Linux, it does depress me to think we'll have a generation of students well educated at posting to Facebook and playing Angry Birds, with children's education fees going to Apple.

I do agree though that computers are plentiful. And if schools have got money to throw on non-computers from Apple, they're not short of money.

I don't think Hodgman meant iPad (as in the Apple product) specifically and more tablet in general (could be wrong there, but that's what some schools are opting for in NZ).

And being realistic here, we're not expecting kids in these classes to produce a AAA game or an enterprise app. We're talking about teaching them an understanding of how computers obey one command after another.

if you think programming is like sex, you probably haven't done much of either.-------------- - capn_midnight

And being realistic here, we're not expecting kids in these classes to produce a AAA game or an enterprise app. We're talking about teaching them an understanding of how computers obey one command after another.

QFE.

It's exposing everyone to the basics.

Tristam MacDonald. Ex-BigTech Software Engineer. Future farmer. [https://trist.am]

This thread is kind long and I am getting into it kind late, but I want to add something that I did not yet identified in my overview of the thread.

Currently we are experiencing a big rush of computers and embedded systems in our lives. The right word I am aiming here is ubiquitous computing.

I think most of you agree that the future we are looking for is something where the systems are so natural in our lives we won't event notice it.

Okay there is maybe a SciFi utopic model for this kind of thing, but analysing our current life model I would like to point out the following:

- A regular person (in the sense of someone without much computer skills/knowledge) often is overwhelmed by the amount of information computers and systems present

- If the regular person understood the basics of how a computer work, maybe it would not scare him/her so much. A little bit of the "magic" would go away and leave space to reasoning and logic (which is good)

- A kid has a great potential for learning and less problems handling with computers

- So a kid is totally capable of learning the basic backend of computers and systems, and capable of achieving incredible things with it (I already pointed out in an older thread the potential of 9-13 yo kids hacking and programming incredible stuff)

Therefore, if we start implementing a course on computer systems / programming of some sort for our kids, this transition to ubiquituous programming will be a little easier and maybe we can find out some hidden geniuses out there too.

I think that the good things achieved by more people familiar with programming/systems organization overcomes the bad stuff.

Programming is an art. Game programming is a masterpiece!

I don't think Hodgman meant iPad (as in the Apple product) specifically and more tablet in general (could be wrong there, but that's what some schools are opting for in NZ).

In the public school system, every student is given an identical/standard laptop for free, which is pre-loaded with a bunch of educational software that the teachers can rely on every student being able to access.

In the private school system though, they do what they want. Yes, I have heard of parents being told that little Johnny has to bring an Apple iPad to school.

I think the reason for ipad was that

a) iTunes university

b) supported tools and software, including ipad education cabinet(?) (http://www.apple.com/education/ipad/)

which makes management easy. Not to mention ipad have built in porn filtering(?), locked out from installing sideloaded software, and much much more. This in itself save a lot of money from support and other problems.

And a lot of educational software (we are talking about database level) only support ipad because of not much fragmentation, so a lot of university only support ipad for certain function - at least when it comes to mobile.

Oracle, AFAIK, only supported ipad for certain line of their software. Or was that one of their partner? Eitherway, fragmentation is not only a problem in game dev, but other dev too when it come to myriad of android version, and flavours, and hardware itself. Because of this certain software (including educational support) only available for ipad, hence, ipad is popular in education.

Hope this answers why ipad is selected in education.


And being realistic here, we're not expecting kids in these classes to produce a AAA game or an enterprise app. We're talking about teaching them an understanding of how computers obey one command after another.

QFE.

It's exposing everyone to the basics.


yep. seems like a goal.


not much to add here, but will note that it is interesting how much this thread manages to go against my meta-cultural expectations. IOW: my "gut sense" / "intuition" implies that people would have been debating a rather different set of points about this topic. (not necessarily that this is good or bad though, but does seem mildly curious).

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement