Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

We're offering banner ads on our site from just $5!

1. Details HERE. 2. GDNet+ Subscriptions HERE. 3. Ad upload HERE.


DX11 - Vertex To Pixel Shaders - Return Types


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
3 replies to this topic

#1 Migi0027   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2111

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 24 May 2013 - 11:44 AM

Hello once again!

 

I have a question that hasn't really been bothering me, but it interests me!

 

So consider the following simple shader:

cbuffer ConstantObjectBuffer : register(c1)
{
    matrix worldMatrix;
    matrix viewMatrix;
    matrix projectionMatrix;

    matrix rotationMatrix;
}

cbuffer ConstantFrameBuffer : register(c0)
{
    float4 lDir;
    float4 lColor;
}

struct VOut
{
    float4 position : SV_POSITION;
    float4 color : COLOR;
};

VOut VShader(float4 position : POSITION, float4 normal : NORMAL)
{
    VOut output;
    output.position = mul(position, worldMatrix);
    output.position = mul(output.position, viewMatrix);
    output.position = mul(output.position, projectionMatrix);
	
    float4 n = normalize(mul(rotationMatrix, normal));
    float diffusebrightness = saturate(dot(n, lDir));
    output.color = lColor * diffusebrightness;

    return output;
}

float4 PShader(VOut input) : SV_TARGET
{
    return input.color;
} 

 

Now in the vertex shaders parameters, it has the vertex position and normal, simple right? But these needs to be defined in the input layout, which I fully understand. But the structure that the vertex shader returns to the pixel shader, called VOut, also have these type definitions. Now what I mean with 'type definitions' (NOT A REAL THING happy.png ), is the following:

 

In the vertex function VOut VShader(float4 position : POSITION, float4 normal : NORMAL), you see that we have a 4 component float called position, and after that we define the input layout schematic: "POSITION". Now the "POSITION" is what I call a type definition wink.png .

 

So back to the vertex returning VOut. In the structure VOut I also define different variables, like .color, and give it a schematic : COLOR, now if I did this in the vertex shader it would crash! But not in this return structure.... So what is the point in defining the non-existing schematic in the vertex return structure? ohmy.png

 

PS. I know that you have to define SV_POSITION as a schematic, as it's kinda fundamental! tongue.png

 

THANKS!


Hi! Cuboid Zone
The Rule: Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to steal all their shaders!

Sponsor:

#2 Racoonacoon   Members   -  Reputation: 443

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 24 May 2013 - 02:29 PM

Hey Migi0027,

 

The semantic does exist. It exists for the pixel shader.

You could write the pixel shader like this if you wanted:

float4 PShader(float4 color : COLOR) : SV_TARGET
{
    return color;
} 

 

The SV_POSITION semantic exists for the non-programmable rasterization stage.


Edited by Racoonacoon, 24 May 2013 - 02:30 PM.


#3 Migi0027   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2111

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 24 May 2013 - 03:08 PM

So the semantic is automatically created for each variable, which is sen't to the pixel shader?

 

Because I could type in some crazy names and it would still work.


Hi! Cuboid Zone
The Rule: Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to steal all their shaders!

#4 insan3   Members   -  Reputation: 108

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 26 May 2013 - 09:01 AM

float5(shaderspixel  color: COLOR) :SV TARGET

{       

 

      return COLOR;

}

 

if (COLOR == !=COLOR)

   return 0;

}






Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS