Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


How to Program SDL More Efficiently?


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
6 replies to this topic

#1 DarrenVortex   Members   -  Reputation: 112

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 06 July 2013 - 10:31 AM

So I wrote my first SDL game (don't ask why I'm still using SDL, it's a programmer's thing), and everything looks good, except...

...

LAG!

...

The lag happens when the background images are blitted. When I reach an area where the background is white and no images are blitted, everything looks smooth. Each image is loaded into a SDL_Surface (once), and blitted every 1 ms inside my draw() loop. The images are jpeg format.

To give you a better picture, this is the regular game scene and this is also where I'm laggy as I move around:

 

LGRpN.jpg

 

 

 

And this is the end of the scene, where the lag magically disappears:

 

KMeg7.jpg

 

 

As I walk back into the regular game scene, the game starts to get laggy again!

 

So, my question in a nutshell: How to make the game more efficient so that it doesn't lag out? (e.g does using bmp images have an effect? Should I not blit them every time in the loop?

 

Also, if you MUST see the code, here it is: http://pastebin.com/0tK4EWeP


Edited by DarrenVortex, 06 July 2013 - 10:32 AM.


Sponsor:

#2 DareDeveloper   GDNet+   -  Reputation: 892

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 06 July 2013 - 11:26 AM

What happens with a lower framerate ... like 60? 1000 is maybe a little much to shoot for.


Edited by DareDeveloper, 06 July 2013 - 11:27 AM.

Given enough eyeballs, all mysteries are shallow.

ProcGames.com


#3 diventurer   Members   -  Reputation: 773

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 06 July 2013 - 11:58 AM

So I wrote my first SDL game (don't ask why I'm still using SDL, it's a programmer's thing)

 

SDL is in no way outdated or lacks features. I don't quite understand why you brought that up.

 

Also, since your background doesn't have many details, you should go for PNG instead of JPEG.

 

As for the BMP question. When you load an image, SDL will load the pixels from the image file to the surface. A BMP file will load faster because there is no compression, but there won't be any significant difference. BMP files get bigger by the amount of pixels, so they can be used for small icons, but you should use PNG either way to be honest.

JPEG should be used for very detailed backgrounds. (if space is an issue of course)

But beyond loading, there is no performance difference between different image formats. As pixels are pixels.

 

I do not have much experience with SDL surfaces and blitting, so I'll leave it at that.



#4 Ludus   Members   -  Reputation: 966

Like
2Likes
Like

Posted 06 July 2013 - 03:45 PM

It doesn't appear that you're converting the format of the surface image to the format of the screen. Not doing so will slow down your program since it will have to convert the image to the screen's format every time it's blitted. When you load your image, use SDL_DisplayFormat (SDL_DisplayFormatAlpha for images with a transparency layer) to return a conversion of the image, then free the original image.

 

Something like this:

Surf_Optimized = SDL_DisplayFormat(Surf_Original); //convert the original image to the format of the screen
SDL_FreeSurface(Surf_Original); //free the original image

Edited by Ludus, 06 July 2013 - 03:49 PM.


#5 radioteeth   Prime Members   -  Reputation: 916

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 06 July 2013 - 04:19 PM

What about blitting onto temporary surfaces that make up the scene, and re-using them, so you're not constantly blitting your tiles over and over every frame. Divide the scene/world up into 8x8 tile patch SDL surfaces, and use them to effectively reduce individual blits when drawing the scene.



#6 Pink Horror   Members   -  Reputation: 1087

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 06 July 2013 - 09:08 PM

So I wrote my first SDL game (don't ask why I'm still using SDL, it's a programmer's thing), and everything looks good, except...

...

LAG!

...

 

  1. const int FRAMES_PER_SECOND = 1000;

 

What's the reason for this?



#7 Godmil   Members   -  Reputation: 739

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 07 July 2013 - 05:26 PM

I take it your background image is pretty large? I've run into problems blitting very large images every frame on lesser hardware, I wonder if you had smaller tiling images for the background if it would be smoother? Just a guess though I'm still quite new to SDL.




Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS