Edited by tstrimple, 19 August 2013 - 03:55 PM.
Jump to content
Posted 19 August 2013 - 04:23 PM
Yup, that is standard boilerplate that is frequently misread. It means you can't package up the product and sell it as your own. For example, you cannot rebrand it as "Shippou's Visual Studio". It does not keep you from distributing products made using the tool.
Getting back to the original poster,
So they are about the same level of abstraction then? I won't be a better programmer with Eclipse (even on Windows)?
Posted 19 August 2013 - 04:24 PM
You posted a link to a forum ...
Here is directly from the end user agreement
PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE LIMITATION.
Unless otherwise specified, the Services are for your personal and non-commercial use. You may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any information, software, products or services obtained from the Services.
Yes I did, but not any forum, Microsoft's own forum. There are plenty of the same questions over there and they all get the same answer.
"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education"
"It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education"
Posted 19 August 2013 - 04:51 PM
My opinion ?
Eclipse doesn't force you to use Micro$oft exclusive libraries when compiling ... Visual Studio forces you to include include "Redistributable" along with your compiled work.
Yeah, gotta watch that evil M$...