Is source-to-game (JIT) common?
Members - Reputation: 107
Posted 09 September 2013 - 09:01 PM
Moderators - Reputation: 11535
Posted 09 September 2013 - 09:19 PM
I'm struggling to see the question....
I've created modifications to Xbox 360 games before. But, one thing I found interesting was the games at their very heart were just source code with resources. Why? Is common for mobile or console developers? Would there be a reason behind JIT compiling a game on a specific platform? Seems useless to me. But there still has got to be a reason. Thanks in advanced!
Yes, games are made up of a program, and work on resources like models, animations, audio, and effects.
If you look at the theory of computing, program + resources is the absolute definition of what computing is.
Can you clarify your question? The way I read that, it seems like you are asking "Matter is made up of things like atoms, why? There has got to be a reason."
Crossbones+ - Reputation: 12549
Posted 09 September 2013 - 09:47 PM
It's perfectly fine to abbreviate my username to 'Servant' rather than copy+pasting it all the time.
All glory be to the Man at the right hand... On David's throne the King will reign, and the Government will rest upon His shoulders. All the earth will see the salvation of God. [Need free cloud storage? I personally like DropBox]
Moderators - Reputation: 19264
Posted 09 September 2013 - 10:48 PM
You're not allowed to JIT compile code on X360, so if you see a 360 game using a language like Lua, then it's doing one worse -- it's interpreting semi-compiled (byte-code) with a VM.
Would there be a reason behind JIT compiling a game on a specific platform?