Edited by farmdve, 04 October 2013 - 04:33 PM.
I am trying to fix how weapons look.,
Members - Reputation: 194
Posted 04 October 2013 - 04:28 PM
Crossbones+ - Reputation: 3826
Posted 05 October 2013 - 12:51 AM
Personally I like pains-taking realism. The most realistic to me is the FPS that allows quick change from first person naked eye view to the scope or gun site view (which is at the correct position and scale that you would see when actually firing a gun). For me it feels good to play with realism even at the sacrifice of a slight amount of combat awareness for a moment - just as in real combat. Of course, in actual fighting a squad of troops would be depending upon one another for combined visual awareness of the situation, group communication filling the role of mitigating the effects of blind spots in an individual soldier's view.
Most people are the opposite of guys like me. They want to sacrifice some realism for convenience and there is nothing wrong with that. I feel that the best FPS games allow the gamer to choose either realistic views or arcade views. Obviously this increases the work for the game developer but is really appreciated.
Personal life and your private thoughts always effect your career. Research is the intellectual backbone of game development and the first order. Version Control is crucial for full management of applications and software. The better the workflow pipeline, then the greater the potential output for a quality game. Completing projects is the last but finest order.
by Clinton, 3Ddreamer
Members - Reputation: 1258
Posted 08 October 2013 - 09:18 AM
I don't see a problem. When you look down the iron sight or scope you are totally focusing to the crosshair whether you are zooming (FOV changes) or not. That is how it is in real life and that's how it should be in games. If using scope/iron sights was easy and didn't have a downside, people would always use them. That doesn't happen IRL and it doesn't happen in games either, and that is successful game design in my opinion.
I don't think this is even matter of realism or not. Aiming accurately simply needs a tradeoff and leaving it out would not "fix" anything. It's the same as you need ammo to fire weapons, you need mana to use spells, you need something to step on in a platformer game etc.
So if you have a scope, put a zoom with field of view change on it so you see the smaller area larger because field of view changes. You can even make the scope fullscreen like here so that nothing besides screen overlay (scope shape) and FOV limits the view. If you use iron sights, make the weapon more accurate and put a small zoom / DoF effect there mainly to indicate this to the player.
BTW If you think the image you found is bad check these examples from Day of Defeat Source:
But the only thing that is off about the above examples is that they are supposed to be corresponding weapons for opposing teams. Did the developers take into consideration that the first has much worse aiming in iron sight mode as they balanced the weapon damages? (the first one basically does double the damage but is also slower, smaller clip, etc) I believe they did.