Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


A Skyrim traditional RPG


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 Wickedrob   Members   -  Reputation: 179

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 31 December 2013 - 08:14 PM

Do you think it'd be possible for a tradtional rpg (Final fantasy, Persona, Dragon quest) version of Skyrim to do well?

For one thing, You'd have to get used to the fact that every 5 steps and BAM! you're in a random battle....again.Id imagine battles wouldnt be as intense and even as much fun.For me, Its more fun being in the action then flipping through menus and waiting turns to attack.But I also know some people who like the idea of tactical RPG's and traditional RPG's better because its NOT as intense and they have time to think.

So what do guys think below?



Sponsor:

#2 TheChubu   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 4187

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 31 December 2013 - 11:03 PM

What is "traditional RPG" ? You do know Elder Scrolls franchise exists since Arena, released in 1994? 

 

Skyrim is hardly "non-traditional" and it's a mold for what you can consider western RPGs.

 

Now, if you mean JRPG based on Elder Scrolls, I don't know, I doubt TES players like JRPGs much.


"I AM ZE EMPRAH OPENGL 3.3 THE CORE, I DEMAND FROM THEE ZE SHADERZ AND MATRIXEZ"

 

My journals: dustArtemis ECS framework and Making a Terrain Generator


#3 Tom Sloper   Moderators   -  Reputation: 9702

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 31 December 2013 - 11:10 PM

Do you think it'd be possible for a tradtional rpg (Final fantasy, Persona, Dragon quest) version of Skyrim to do well?


Anything is possible except time travel to the past and the Star Trek holodeck. I assume by "do well" you mean "make good money" -- but on what kind of scale? Like GTA V money, or Angry Birds money?

This question seems more like a business question than a game design question, don't you think?

Edited by Tom Sloper, 31 December 2013 - 11:11 PM.

-- Tom Sloper
Sloperama Productions
Making games fun and getting them done.
www.sloperama.com

Please do not PM me. My email address is easy to find, but note that I do not give private advice.

#4 Adam Moore   Members   -  Reputation: 326

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 01 January 2014 - 11:24 AM

What is "traditional RPG" ? You do know Elder Scrolls franchise exists since Arena, released in 1994? 

 

Skyrim is hardly "non-traditional" and it's a mold for what you can consider western RPGs.

 

Now, if you mean JRPG based on Elder Scrolls, I don't know, I doubt TES players like JRPGs much.

 

I think jRPG is what he meant by traditional.

 

There are a lot of different ways the two similar genres can be brought together, and some of the ways might work well.

 

Would it sell well? That's an unknown - we're stepping into the realm of speculation with that question. Why would people buy this game instead of Skyrim?



#5 NoAdmiral   Members   -  Reputation: 511

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 03 January 2014 - 08:01 AM

I think jRPGs and wRPGs (western-RPGs) are meant for different experiences. jRPGs tell a story, and a lot of them do this really well. Final Fantasy, Chrono Trigger, etc., have all focused on telling the story that they wanted to tell. Is the combat engaging? Sometimes, but it's a limited system. (In Final Fantasy 7, I felt that the meta-combat (combining materia to make more-viable spells) was more entertaining than the menu-driven actual-combat). Most importantly, it's a story about a character.

 

This is in stark contrast to wRPGs, which tend to tell a story about you, or the open-world style games where you tell the story. The combat tends to be more engaging (debatable, obviously), but the story is limited by the open-world-ness, if that's a mechanic, or by engaging the player in the story that is about them (this isn't impossible, it just tends to be done poorly, I think).

 

jRPGs often have an open-world component (most FF games once you get the airship), but it's a relatively small component and really serves one purpose: getting everything you missed. 

 

I think that trying to combine these genres, based on their strengths and weaknesses, is going to make for a pretty weak game (though I'm very often wrong). 

 

A lot of this was inspired by the Extra Credits videos; these are not all my ideas.


Inspiration from my tea:

"Never wish life were easier. Wish that you were better" -Jim Rohn

 

herwrathmustbedragons.tumblr.com





Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS