Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Steampunk industrial turn based strategy


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
22 replies to this topic

#1 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 16 February 2014 - 02:25 PM

I have been working on a prototype of a turn based strategy where you run a small country (on an island) and, well, build/improve your country (mainly industry). It's all set in a Victorian XIX century like theme.

 

First, I tried to make it an Industrial Revolution (historical, sort of), without warfare and just agriculture, industry, trade, inventions and social problems. But then I was started to think that Steampunk theme would fit much better here (non historical map, cool inventions, etc) and that maybe some warfare (defensive one, not conquest) would not hurt.

 

So, I wanted to stop for now and think/reevaluate what the game is about. Without any assumptions and such (a fresh look). How would you advice me? How could/should I proceed with such game?

(note I'm not asking how to make this game, I have my own ideas and views, but I just wanted to take a step back and listen, to refresh my perspective)

 

 

Here is the prototype http://silverlemur.com/work/ir-prototype.zip (Windows, low requirements)

 

A screen of the provinces map:

ir-screen-map_zpsec586314.png

 

 

 


Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


Sponsor:

#2 Stormynature   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3338

Like
4Likes
Like

Posted 17 February 2014 - 09:15 AM

Where is the tutorial for playing the game? I done pressed so many build buttons that one land became submerged under the sheer weight of overproducing giant leaping spider bots, whilst another land ran out of food and cannibalised each other until only one fat peasant was left alive who then successfully launched a one man invasion of the neighbouring province. 

 

Yeah I need a readme/gameplay tutorial Acharis plz...I am dumb :(



#3 LittleVikings   Members   -  Reputation: 311

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 17 February 2014 - 12:57 PM

It's kind of difficult to know what to look at, since you haven't really asked a specific question, but here are a few random thoughts anyway ..

 

Honestly, I'm having trouble picturing what the aim would/could be in this scenario. I seem to have a nation with several regions or provinces, each of which has been assigned resources (randomly?). Editing the map seems to have no impact on these, so my immediate instinct is that there should be an underlying resource map, and the borders of a province determines what resources it encompasses. From there it might be nice to place individual buildings, so that it becomes a challenge to make the best use of available land, but that still doesn't provide an over-arching goal.

 

Neighbouring kingdoms could add some diplomatic relations, trade, etc., and if they're on the map, you could fight over borders. Otherwise, I'm not sure how you'd work warfare into this, unless it was possible to have a civil war, and certainly defence-only warfare would be quite dissatisfying.

 

By "cool inventions", do you mean that you would unlock more industries? I don't really see how else this would work right now, or what they could contribute to the game, other than eye-candy. If you're fighting over borders, at least you have a reason to research and build weapons, which makes good fuel for industrial advances.

 

A lord (duke, or what-have-you) to govern each province might be a good way to give each area individuality. He would give some feedback about how his province is doing, and probably have strengths and weaknesses which would further affect the performance of his lands, and influence how you distribute land. I'm not sure what purpose the various regions have otherwise.

 

Getting back to the aim of the game, the most obvious approach would be to add multi-player, since players will automatically compete for whatever numbers they can get their hands on, but this doesn't appear to be part of the plan (?).

 

Competing for inventions could be the main goal, with something like a permanent bonus for the first player to discover a technology, and incentive for other players (although I'm sure you could make this work in single-player too) to spy on them for bonus research points toward this invention. This seems to me like a nice dynamic, providing plenty of motivation for conflict, and options for how to react to or avoid it, as well as a good excuse to throw in whatever cool technologies you want for players to fight over.

 

This could work on an international scale, or with each player controlling a region, and the NPC king redistributing land, titles, etc. based on your successes, but then your territory is pretty small, so you kind of get stuck with a role (limited resource allocation) based on which region you start out with, which might suck.

 

I think if you decide on what the aim of the game is, most things will logically fall into place from there. It could just be collecting points - Settlers of Catan gets plenty of mileage out of it, so why not?



#4 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
3Likes
Like

Posted 17 February 2014 - 04:00 PM


Yeah I need a readme/gameplay tutorial Acharis plz...

I know, my games are confusing, sorry smile.png But I also think it's confusing because most things in the prototype does not work yet as supposesd to (there is no food consumption, you can go negative resources, building use only money, etc). Generally, the prototype (at the moment of writing) works like this. You decide what you want to build and where, then you do it and click EndTurn. The buildings will produce/process stuff. If you notice you are getting negative resources it means you are supposed to build more of mines/whatever you lack (again, in the current prototype it does not check for shortages, it always produces). Also you can move the map and resize the window to see how interface adjusts smile.png Oh yes, there is also workforce, but they change jobs automaticly, you don't need to manage them (in final version you will have some indirect ways to affect workforce allocation).

 

Generally, it's completely unplayable, and I gave the link to get the overall feel (interface, building types). So it would be easier to give ideas.

 

Also thanks for downloading the prototype, it's always very nice when people do it (especially since prototypes usually sux and are far inferior to even a demo) smile.png

 

 

 


It's kind of difficult to know what to look at, since you haven't really asked a specific question

It was on purpose. In this topic I primarily want your "impressions". You see the game and you tell me what you think/how would you want to play it/how would you do it if it was you doing this game/etc.

 

Multiplayer - no, no multiplayer (technical and other reasons) it's strictly singleplayer.

 

War - Hmmm, so you say defensive battles are no good? Even if, suppose, the game is primarily about other things than warfare (trade, economy, production)?

Anyway, here is a topic with some ideas http://www.gamedev.net/topic/652495-tower-defence-war-mechanic-for-a-turn-based-strategy/

 

Aim of the game - yes, I agree smile.png I have my (quite solid) ideas of the aim of the game (the nice thing is that at this stage I can still easily change them, since I have only map and basic production system) but I wanted to think out of my box. I will post my aim of the game a few posts later, but not yet, I first want to listen. So, do you have some interesting "aims" for such game (assuming singleplayer)? smile.png


Edited by Acharis, 17 February 2014 - 04:02 PM.

Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#5 LittleVikings   Members   -  Reputation: 311

Like
4Likes
Like

Posted 17 February 2014 - 05:30 PM

Assuming that you can only be attacked and lose land, and cannot retaliate or expand by means of a military, I think defensive-only military conflicts in a game which includes military conflict as a territorial mechanic would be kind of a silly restriction. If you have other options, why not that one?

 

For an aim, it would be nice to have a variety of options to choose from, maybe even as a choice of win conditions before you start a game. The obvious way to do this is using the ducks-in-a-row method employed by many solitaire games : Reach 0% unemployment, 100% fulfilment, or what-have-you in all regions, or establish trade routes, diplomatic relations, etc. with all neighbours.

 

You could also use an actual "main goal" (again, why not choose from a selection, to reflect the play style you want for this session?) Reach the moon, build a world capital for trade, culture, etc. Building a set of scientific colleges (botany, zoology, chemistry, astrology, etc.) would fit nicely with a steampunk feel. The level of outside influence or competition you want will probably determine which of these are more likely to suit.

 

The goal could simply be to drag your nation, kicking and screaming, into the modern age. They'd bitch and moan about all the changes, but they'd be pleased with the outcomes, so you'd be trying to make the transition as smooth as possible by capitalizing on advancements to make up for loss of jobs and ways of life etc.

 

Collecting points may initially seem uninteresting, but there is no reason why it should be. Key to success with this goal is making the points represent something interesting or valuable, more like achievements or medals. For example, your nation could have mad inventors who write to the king asking for funding for projects. You, as the king, decide, which of these are likely to succeed or fail (based on the inventor's region of origin and its available resources, availability of supporting technologies, etc.), and fund the right projects, which, upon completion, will give you a victory point. As the project progresses, you receive further instructions, requiring you to meet various randomized mini-challenges to keep things interesting, but you can, of course, push resources in the right direction, research technologies, free up labour, and draw in investors, to indirectly influence the chance of success. Failure of the project would probably cost you a VP, but there may be ways to mitigate the loss. Maybe you even score on multiple tracks. Let's say a successful project to build the first airship would give you an industrial point, but if you publicize it and gain foreign investment, you could gain a cultural point as a bonus. Going for the bonus point comes with a risk, because if the project fails, you will lose both industrial and cultural points. Now points are not just a score, but a reminder of a challenge successfully met.

 

It would be nice to be able to build networks based around companies (or "societies" or whatever) which arise spontaneously as a result of the right combination of resources and abundance of enterprise. For instance, a region with a good supply of steel and coal, and a certain level of throughput within the kingdom would result in the rail company being set up. That would allow you to access the railway infrastructure interface, which would allow you to increase the flow, both domestic and international, of trade goods and resources. Similar systems would work for electricity, gas, airfields, etc., each of which would bring improvements in some area (resource flow, access to technologies, citizen wellbeing, etc., even tourism and renown). This might be a nice way to give some focus and distinction to individual regions if only one company or utility can be run from each.

 

Maybe the projects come up as challenges from other nations, as in "Your neighbour, France, challenges you to a race across the Atlantic" or "British build 100MPH car!" and you have to do it bigger, better, faster, etc.

 

Or you could commission the projects yourself. The challenge then would be to take enough out of the country to complete the project, without upsetting the population, disrupting trade, etc.

 

I may have got a bit carried away there. I'm not very good with the aim-of-the-game question, but I think if you look at the big achievers in the industrial revolution, and try to isolate what made them winners in whatever sense you deem most enjoyable, it should give some clues as to what a player should be expected to do in order to win in a game about industry.



#6 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 19 February 2014 - 11:01 AM

[...] neighbouring province.
How you feel about the map?

 

- Assuming the internal province stuff is relatively rich/complex, do you find the current 12 provinces enough? Maybe add more?

- How you feel about the island surrounded by endless sea? Is it OK? Or maybe I should add some other islands around it, even if with very limited interaction (like owned by AI nations but no option to conquer)? If yes, how important adding these you feel is?

- Overall, what was you experience regarding interacting with the map?

- Does the map require zooming? And minimap?


Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#7 LittleVikings   Members   -  Reputation: 311

Like
2Likes
Like

Posted 20 February 2014 - 06:08 AM

How you feel about the map?

I feel OK about it, but I like hexagons. If I didn't, I'd be annoyed that they exist without a purpose.

I also want it to be procedurally generated so I can play more than once.

The giant leaping spider bots button needs to be more obvious.

 

- Assuming the internal province stuff is relatively rich/complex, do you find the current 12 provinces enough? Maybe add more?

This seems like a game balance question, and there is no game yet. It's impossible to say without knowing what they're for.

 

- How you feel about the island surrounded by endless sea? Is it OK? Or maybe I should add some other islands around it, even if with very limited interaction (like owned by AI nations but no option to conquer)? If yes, how important adding these you feel is?

Personally, I feel a bit bad about it. It feels isolated, and accentuates the feeling of having no aim or impact. More islands are only useful if you can interact with them in some meaningful way.

Also, possibly irrelevant, but if you give me an island, I want a boat.

 

- Overall, what was you experience regarding interacting with the map?

It was fairly smooth and intuitive, although scrolling at the edges of the window was unnecessary since the whole map fits in the window, and especially annoying because it continues when the mouse is outside of the window.

 

- Does the map require zooming? And minimap?

No. Zooming might be nice, because it's interface customization, which helps with comfort and convenience (You could zoom out so the island is small enough to fit in the right-hand side of the screen, beside that huge build interface, which could probably be smaller), but I can see no reason to have a minimap.



#8 Orymus3   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 8945

Like
2Likes
Like

Posted 20 February 2014 - 11:44 AM

Don't know if that's relevant to you, but I have had a few UX concerns.

For example, your End Turn button should be bigger, and hopefully on the bottom right.

Also, the resources overlay should be something that can always be displayed from the HUD (it looks like its important enough that I might want to have it up when making decisions on what to build next).

 

 

From a gameplay standpoint, I'm a bit surprised that construction hardly impacts population growth. I've taken one of the smallest provinces and boosted their schools/university and industry by a significant margin (99 everywhere in fact) and it failed to catch up with any other province over the course of many many turns skipped. I'd be tempted to believe that, as people increase their average income, so too would they better be able to care for their children and insure they are in good health and eventually become part of the nation's economy?

 

I'm also a bit unsure where you are headed with the overall design. It seems there's actually few to do (choose what to build essentially). What is the core gameplay loop you are hoping to achieve? (logical flow of things you expect one player to actively engage in repeatedly).

 

All in all, its good to see an executable though :) Keep it up! (never give up on the indie life)



#9 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 20 February 2014 - 02:45 PM


I feel OK about it, but I like hexagons. If I didn't, I'd be annoyed that they exist without a purpose.
Yeah, I had a slight dilemma with the hexagons. On one hand these have no real purpose, on the other I like hexes :D

 


although scrolling at the edges of the window was unnecessary since the whole map fits in the window, and especially annoying because it continues when the mouse is outside of the window.
And if you maximize the window (or even better go fullscreen - you can do it via config.ini)? Still annoying?

I was testing disabling the mouse movement if outside thw window, but then there is problem with making the map move at all (you move max to the left and you are outside...) Also its terrible if you have dualscreen and fullscreen (right part of the map scroll would "not register" since you frequesntly "overshoot").

 

A note: this is supposed to run in fullscreen by default in the final version.

 


Also, the resources overlay should be something that can always be displayed from the HUD (it looks like its important enough that I might want to have it up when making decisions on what to build next).
I have a problem/dilemma here. Should I do it? First of all, I can't display them all (need to choose what to display). Buildings will use planks and bricks to build. When you build railroads you might need planks and steel. Other upgrades (bureaucratic/laws) might require paper.

Such display would look very odd/random (imagine planks, bricks, paper and steel :D).

 


From a gameplay standpoint, I'm a bit surprised that construction hardly impacts population growth. I've taken one of the smallest provinces and boosted their schools/university and industry by a significant margin (99 everywhere in fact) and it failed to catch up with any other province over the course of many many turns skipped. I'd be tempted to believe that, as people increase their average income, so too would they better be able to care for their children and insure they are in good health and eventually become part of the nation's economy?
Not implemented yet :)

I think I should have called this TechDemo instead of a prototype, would be less confusing :)

 

I know, check this web version of my much older (but quite playable) prototype:

http://silverlemur.com/minigames/industrialrevolution/

I plan to go a bit different route (for example separating the country into individual regions and removing land concept), but yeah, it should convey the mood and mechanics I aim for much better than the .exe version.

 


I'm also a bit unsure where you are headed with the overall design.
You know, it's a brainstorming topic. I want to reevaluate my overall design (so I prefer to avoid answering this yet), instead I would like to listen what overall design you see emerging from the current map+production system+theme.

Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#10 Orymus3   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 8945

Like
2Likes
Like

Posted 21 February 2014 - 10:49 AM

 


I feel OK about it, but I like hexagons. If I didn't, I'd be annoyed that they exist without a purpose.
Yeah, I had a slight dilemma with the hexagons. On one hand these have no real purpose, on the other I like hexes biggrin.png

 

 

 


although scrolling at the edges of the window was unnecessary since the whole map fits in the window, and especially annoying because it continues when the mouse is outside of the window.
And if you maximize the window (or even better go fullscreen - you can do it via config.ini)? Still annoying?

I was testing disabling the mouse movement if outside thw window, but then there is problem with making the map move at all (you move max to the left and you are outside...) Also its terrible if you have dualscreen and fullscreen (right part of the map scroll would "not register" since you frequesntly "overshoot").

 

A note: this is supposed to run in fullscreen by default in the final version.

 

 

 


Also, the resources overlay should be something that can always be displayed from the HUD (it looks like its important enough that I might want to have it up when making decisions on what to build next).
I have a problem/dilemma here. Should I do it? First of all, I can't display them all (need to choose what to display). Buildings will use planks and bricks to build. When you build railroads you might need planks and steel. Other upgrades (bureaucratic/laws) might require paper.

Such display would look very odd/random (imagine planks, bricks, paper and steel biggrin.png).

 

 

 


From a gameplay standpoint, I'm a bit surprised that construction hardly impacts population growth. I've taken one of the smallest provinces and boosted their schools/university and industry by a significant margin (99 everywhere in fact) and it failed to catch up with any other province over the course of many many turns skipped. I'd be tempted to believe that, as people increase their average income, so too would they better be able to care for their children and insure they are in good health and eventually become part of the nation's economy?
Not implemented yet smile.png

I think I should have called this TechDemo instead of a prototype, would be less confusing smile.png

 

I know, check this web version of my much older (but quite playable) prototype:

http://silverlemur.com/minigames/industrialrevolution/

I plan to go a bit different route (for example separating the country into individual regions and removing land concept), but yeah, it should convey the mood and mechanics I aim for much better than the .exe version.

 

 

 


I'm also a bit unsure where you are headed with the overall design.
You know, it's a brainstorming topic. I want to reevaluate my overall design (so I prefer to avoid answering this yet), instead I would like to listen what overall design you see emerging from the current map+production system+theme.

 

 

 

You could have an overlay panel that can be switched on/off at the botom, but that isn't concurrent with other menus. Then replace text with icons, making it more intelligible. That way, you give the player the ability to display all of the resources when they believe they need it. I think a common misconception in design is to make assumptions for the player. A number of UI awards have been granted to games that actually allow the user to decide what they need to see.



#11 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 22 February 2014 - 06:32 AM


- How you feel about the island surrounded by endless sea? Is it OK? Or maybe I should add some other islands around it, even if with very limited interaction (like owned by AI nations but no option to conquer)? If yes, how important adding these you feel is?

Personally, I feel a bit bad about it. It feels isolated, and accentuates the feeling of having no aim or impact. More islands are only useful if you can interact with them in some meaningful way.

Also, possibly irrelevant, but if you give me an island, I want a boat.
Hmm, I get similar feeling...

 

OK, I need to tell more about the game.

I strongly want to make it assymnetrical. I mean, I don't want it to turn into a huge Europa Universalis with hunders of countries with zillion provinces and a totally dumb incompetent AI. I want to make the "AI empires" maximum simplified (no simulating economy, minimum AI), I defnitely don't want to code all this :)

 

But more than one island indeed sounds better...

 

So, how about something like that:

- the player owns an island with 12-16 provinces

- there are other AI empire controlled islands nearby, you can wage war with these bur for concessions, never to grab their territory

- there are several small unpopulated islands that can be colonized, countries can wage wars for the right to colonize these, if colonized a wild province is not assimilated but simply provides resources (all industry has to be on the main island)

 

On the map you see foreign (AI contrioled) islands as one colour provinces. Clicking on any of these provinces (within same country) opens the same panel which allows diplomacy & trade.

You also see uncolonized provinces (or colonized by others - which you can take over), each province separately, displaying resources (frequently rare like spice) and native population (good for buying your finished goods).

 

Something along these lines, what you think or maybe you have ideas for improvements?

 

 


I also want it to be procedurally generated so I can play more than once.
Everything fixed but with a campaign system instead (like Tropico). Possible scenario editor as well.

 


Also, the resources overlay should be something that can always be displayed from the HUD (it looks like its important enough that I might want to have it up when making decisions on what to build next).
Maybe a tooltip (when you mouse over build button) displaying how much you cas and what you have? Also grayed out build button if not enough resources.

 


You could have an overlay panel that can be switched on/off at the botom, but that isn't concurrent with other menus. Then replace text with icons, making it more intelligible. That way, you give the player the ability to display all of the resources when they believe they need it. I think a common misconception in design is to make assumptions for the player. A number of UI awards have been granted to games that actually allow the user to decide what they need to see.
Bleh... I hate, hate, hate these :) No matter how many avards these got I would refuse to play such a game (fortuanatelly I haven't seen any like these in the last 15 years, they seem to exctinct).

Anyway, even if, any customization is for advanced players who already know how to play. My concern is new players (like Stormynature in the first post who got confused which made my heart cry :(). Once I make a prototype that is intuitive to play I can think of customization options. Right now my goal is that Stormynature downloads the next version and says "hey, it's easy I get it all now, even without reading tutorial/manual" :)


Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#12 powerneg   Members   -  Reputation: 1463

Like
4Likes
Like

Posted 22 February 2014 - 07:07 AM

Orymus wasn't so much talking about customization, as he was talking about different tabs/pages to show at the same time.

Why not keep the current interface to control everything, and have a bottom-interface where a player can cycle through different kinds of resources/info ?



#13 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 24 February 2014 - 06:00 PM

At the moment I need feedback on the map the most. Should there be AI empires? Or colonization of some islands (while still preserving the focus of industrailization, not on warfare or territorial expansion)?

 


I strongly want to make it assymetrical. I mean, I don't want it to turn into a huge Europa Universalis with hunders of countries with zillion provinces and a totally dumb incompetent AI. I want to make the "AI empires" maximum simplified (no simulating economy, minimum AI), I defnitely don't want to code all this smile.png

But more than one island indeed sounds better...

So, how about something like that:
- the player owns an island with 12-16 provinces
- there are other AI empire controlled islands nearby, you can wage war with these bur for concessions, never to grab their territory
- there are several small unpopulated islands that can be colonized, countries can wage wars for the right to colonize these, if colonized a wild province is not assimilated but simply provides resources (all industry has to be on the main island)

On the map you see foreign (AI controled) islands as one colour provinces. Clicking on any of these provinces (within same country) opens the same panel which allows diplomacy & trade.
You also see uncolonized provinces (or colonized by others - which you can take over), each province separately, displaying resources (frequently rare like spice) and native population (good for buying your finished goods).

Something along these lines, what you think or maybe you have ideas for improvements?

Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#14 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 05 March 2014 - 05:25 PM

I was thinking and concluded that unpopulated provinces and colonization would completely change the game's focus and eventually turn it into a wargame (you see an uncolonized province, you want it colonized, but the AI was faster so now you want to fight for it, so you won the colony but hey, why stop now, let's conquer the whole AI country and... we ended up with Risk/Civilization/Europa Universalis :D)

 

In order to preserve the industial/economic/technological feel of the game I need to somehow stress the importance of the provinces/territory you start with and maybe somehow reduce the importance of army and warfare (maybe with an exception to navy since it's not about controling provinces?)

 

I can see two ways:

1) Keep it as it is now (one island on an endless empty sea), maybe adding more provinces for the player to manage (like 30).

2) Make the player's island divided into provinces and then add several islands controlled by AI (without division to provinces), when you click on any AI island it opens trade/diplomacy screen instead of a province view.

 

Advice which one is better? Or other thoughts?


Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#15 LittleVikings   Members   -  Reputation: 311

Like
2Likes
Like

Posted 07 March 2014 - 05:39 AM

I think one island is OK if you start with one province on it and expand to fill more. Maybe allow the player to manage land by selecting the hexes to form the new province, and calculate cost of expansion based on number of hexes, constitution, etc.

 

The second option sounds fine too, and it might even be nice if the AI expands (as above), and you have the opportunity to establish provinces on the other islands if you're quick enough, and willing to soak up the initial cost. The advantage of these provinces would be reduced costs when trading with other nations on the island (no need for ships).

 

My feeling is that, at the moment, there's no sense of "tangible" progress, and no motivation - all you do is make the little numbers change. That might be fine in multi-player games, because competition with other players provides the motivation, but in single-player, you need something (like expansion) to drive gameplay.



#16 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 08 March 2014 - 12:14 PM

My feeling is that, at the moment, there's no sense of "tangible" progress, and no motivation - all you do is make the little numbers change. That might be fine in multi-player games, because competition with other players provides the motivation, but in single-player, you need something (like expansion) to drive gameplay.
You are right... Instead of the map, let's start with the overall goal of the game.

 

I definitely don't want conquest/expansion/war as the core gameplay. I think, in terms of the spirit, the most similar to my vision are Tropico (just one island and only defensive battles) and Anno 1xxx (in theory there was conquest but in practice you colonized 2-3 islands at most (where one was your main island with bulk of the infrastructure) and then achieved your victory via economic/infrastructural means). I think something like Tropic/Anno 1xxx, but divided into provinces and without separate buildings whose proximity is important, is what my aim is (sort of)...

 

Upgrading your infrastructure, upgrading your population, upgrading your technology and improving your economical power. Something along these lines.

 

What you think?


Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#17 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 15 March 2014 - 04:48 PM

Maybe I should clarify my question. What is the nature of Tropic/Anno 1xxx games? What is the core "goal"? What is the most fun part for you? And can you see them working "divided into provinces" as I plan to do it?

(note that I played these games, just wanted to see your perspective and thoughts because, while I enjoyed these games, I'm not sure I fully "get them" :))


Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)


#18 Mister Donovan   Members   -  Reputation: 169

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 16 March 2014 - 02:55 AM

I don't have a whole lot to contribute here, but I'll say this. If I was browsing games, your Steam Punk theme would attract my attention even though I'm not a huge fan of this type of game. I only hope that the game's design reflects the theme somehow, and it's not just eye candy.



#19 LittleVikings   Members   -  Reputation: 311

Like
1Likes
Like

Posted 16 March 2014 - 04:15 AM

I'm sorry it took me so long to reply, and more so because of what I have to say ..

 

I'm not a fan of management sims, so if you ask me what the point is, I'll say there is none. They're a simulation (more akin to toys than games) of bean-counting (as much fun as a stick in the eye). A fan would probably tell you that the point is to make the little people do your bidding (maybe not in those words). Essentially, the aim of the game is to "build a thriving nation", which, to me, means that there is no clearly defined goal, or it is too subjective to be definable, and that's the first thing I'd want to set straight, although, come to think of it, I vaguely recall elections which you had to win to keep playing, or something like that. Honestly, my experiences with these "games" have been that unmemorable.

 

On a more constructive note, looking objectively at your own experience of this type of game in the wider context of game design, have you found the play experience, and in particular its conclusion, satisfying? And if so, what did it satisfy? I think that that will give you your answer.



#20 Acharis   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3665

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 16 March 2014 - 08:40 AM

I don't have a whole lot to contribute here, but I'll say this. If I was browsing games, your Steam Punk theme would attract my attention even though I'm not a huge fan of this type of game. I only hope that the game's design reflects the theme somehow, and it's not just eye candy.

Primarily I wanted to make a turn based strategy. And during design process I noticed that steampunk theme would fit it very well (coal, factories, steam engines, brass, zeppelins, Victorian era). So, I want to make it steampunk as the core part (it simply fits with the rest of my vision) but I have not played many steampunk games so I feel a bit lost :D I could use some advices/thoughts related to steampunk theme (as long as these are compatible with turn based strategies, so for exampole no "arcade style shooting when flying steam powered zeppelin" :)). BTW, is there my impression or is there extremely few/none steampunk themed strategies?

 

BTW, I'm looking for a name for this game that would on one hand reflect the "steampunk" part and on the other the "turn based strategy where you run your own nation" part.

http://www.gamedev.net/topic/652604-steampunk-industrial-revolution-looking-for-a-name/


Europe1300.eu - Historical Realistic Medieval Sim (RELEASED!)





Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS