Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

35Gb for audio, are you kidding me?


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
71 replies to this topic

#1 Vortez   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2698

Posted 12 March 2014 - 12:32 PM

So, i was browsing the net yesterday when i found this news. I dunno why(i don't anticipate the game or know anything about it) but this outraged the programmer in me. For those who don't know, that's the issue.

 

 

 

Over on the Xbox One, the installation is only about 20GB. So, why the disparity in size — is it the high-res textures? A lack of optimization? No, it’s all thanks to roughly 35GB of uncompressed audio.

...

The game’s minimum CPU requirement is a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, and that simply isn’t enough horsepower to run the game and decompress audio at the same time

 

Right... And i am king arthur prince of camelot...

 

Seriously tho, this doesn't make any sense. First of all, audio never been a bottleneck in any game i've ever played since 1995 and the invention of sound cards. Also, why 99% of the peoples have to pay this massive price for the ones who don't have a decent cpu? (Again, how is the sound the bottleneck, and not graphics, humm?) Think about it, 35gb of uncompressed audio equal roughly 3gb of compressed audio, that's 32gb less on your drive right there. Then, there the fact that the audio files contain ALL languages, you can't just chose to install the english ones or the french ones, and that's another thing that drive me nut.

 

Most peoples that leaved comments said that with today's price of hard drive memory, that's nothing, but they are missing the point, the point is that it could be 1-2gb instead of 35gb, and that this space is a total waste that could be used for other things.

 

The compagny that made this game show a total disrespect of their consumers, and i hope this thrend will not get adopted by others company as well.

 

What do you think?

 

EDIT: crap, i meant to post in the lounge... sorry about that


Edited by Vortez, 12 March 2014 - 12:44 PM.


Sponsor:

#2 Ravyne   GDNet+   -  Reputation: 7351

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:22 PM

Yes, if that's the reason its asinine. Decoding a few ogg or mp3 files isn't going to be that big a burden on the CPU. And even if it were, there's no reason it couldn't be done during loading.

 

A much more likely reason, methinks, is that the Xbox One has co-processors which can stream and route data without CPU intervention, and also has co-processors to decompress popular compressed formats including, for sure, JPEG and LZW, and probably mp3 as well. My guess would be that the Xbox One version of the software takes advantage of this to stream compressed audio directly to the mixer, decompressing it at the same time, and that they didn't take the time to really change how this works to be more suitable for the PC -- it sounds like the did the minimum work of creating a kind of shim to do the streaming, and that the PC, of course, doesn't have hardware to decompress it. That would mean they couldn't decompress the audio during loading screens, because its too built into the game, and I suppose if they would be decompressing a lot of audio streams, and their min-spec processor represented significantly-higher potential install base by keeping it just that much lower, then you could make a business case for such a decision -- but it really is just laziness that they didn't consider PC audio from the ground up to begin with.


Edited by Ravyne, 12 March 2014 - 01:22 PM.


#3 TheChubu   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 4339

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:23 PM

Wait... Streaming 35Gb of audio from a regular HDD is supposed to be faster than decompressing it on the fly on the CPU!?

 

It's like I'm not living in the same world as those guys.


"I AM ZE EMPRAH OPENGL 3.3 THE CORE, I DEMAND FROM THEE ZE SHADERZ AND MATRIXEZ"

 

My journals: dustArtemis ECS framework and Making a Terrain Generator


#4 Rattrap   Members   -  Reputation: 1653

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:27 PM


A much more likely reason, methinks, is that the Xbox One has co-processors which can stream and route data without CPU intervention, and also has co-processors to decompress popular compressed formats including, for sure, JPEG and LZW, and probably mp3 as well.

 

IGN - Respawn Explains Titanfall's 48GB PC Install

 


Speaking to Eurogamer, lead engineer Richard Baker explained that the data takes up so much more space on PC as it's designed to work with lower end machines. In contrast, the Xbox One version of the game is roughly 17GB as there's audio decode built into the hardware.

 


"So... it's almost all audio... On a higher PC it wouldn't be an issue. On a medium or moderate PC, it wouldn't be an issue, it's that on a two-core [machine] with where our min spec is, we couldn't dedicate those resources to audio," he concluded.

 

So the install is huge to make the minimum specs so low, or so they say.



#5 Prinz Eugn   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 3619

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:35 PM

I bought the PC disc (DVD) version because Dell had a giftcard deal... I had no idea, but I'll post pictures when it comes in next week, that's like 11 DVDs.


-Mark the Artist

Digital Art and Technical Design
Developer Journal


#6 Rattrap   Members   -  Reputation: 1653

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:40 PM

I bought the PC disc (DVD) version because Dell had a giftcard deal... I had no idea, but I'll post pictures when it comes in next week, that's like 11 DVDs.

 

Ironically, it does sound like it is compressed on the install disc.  So think of the install as an optimization, saving the CPU effort during game play.



#7 Serapth   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5456

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:42 PM

It's a brute force lazy way of making the game playable on the largest number of machines couple with playing audio at a fidelity that is just downright stupid.

 

That said, the game is a collection of WTF design decisions.

 

The campaign mode is insanely stupid...  the story gets in the way ( literally ) of the game, drowning out audio queues with confusing audio commentary.  Most mindnumbingly though, it's the complete lack of a matchmaker.  My first match in campaign mode was me at Level 1, and 4 other Level 1 - 5 players, against 6 players all over level 20.

 

So, we start down a man, with no weapon upgrades against a team composed entirely of experienced vets.  This pretty much poisoned my opinion of the game from this point on.



#8 Serapth   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5456

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:43 PM

 

I bought the PC disc (DVD) version because Dell had a giftcard deal... I had no idea, but I'll post pictures when it comes in next week, that's like 11 DVDs.

 

Ironically, it does sound like it is compressed on the install disc.  So think of the install as an optimization, saving the CPU effort during game play.

 

 

This.

 

Really all they needed was an install option "I have a modern PC, dont install uncompressed audio" check box and problem solved.  This reeks of a last minute "oh shit" hack job.

 

EDIT: Oh, and wrong forum.


Edited by Serapth, 12 March 2014 - 01:44 PM.


#9 Dezachu   Members   -  Reputation: 386

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:44 PM

It's interesting. I know our game's (Angry Birds Go!) load times at boot are because of sound decompression. I think it's nice that they've considered lower spec PCs, but these days dual-core PCs are rare amongst gamers. If anyone was serious about gaming I'd imagine they'd have upgraded to at least quad a long time ago. 

 

Plus lets face it; if someone is playing on a dual-core processor, chances are their PC is old and the storage space isn't fantastic. It's a bizarre solution, but admirable nonetheless :)


Studying BSc Computer Games Programming @ De Montfort University, Leicester.

Completed a placement as a Junior Programmer at Exient Ltd in Oxford/Valletta, Malta


#10 minibutmany   Members   -  Reputation: 1613

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:50 PM

Most of the gamer kiddies will be playing this with the ear-buds that came with their iPod, so I see no reason to use high quality audio in the first place.

My HD is about 400 gb, why would I want 1/8 of it to be filled with one game?


Stay gold, Pony Boy.

#11 Serapth   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5456

Posted 12 March 2014 - 01:51 PM

Oh, and on the topic of stupid game design, how stupid is this...

 

First, there is obviously the fact that the matchmaker doesnt do shit, so you get horribly lobsided teams.  Plus there is no accounting for 6 friends playing together vs a bunch of soloists... but thats common to all dude-bro games.

 

 

What kills me is...

 

You jump in to the campaign at level 1, you get put in the Militia side.  You complete that campagin, then start the other side of the conflict.

 

This means by default, all level 1s are ALWAYS on one side of the battle.

 

Stupid stupid stupid stupid.



#12 Madhed   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2906

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:04 PM

Uhm... 28GB are roughly 44 hours of non-stop CD-quality audio. I find that hard to believe.



#13 Serapth   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5456

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:17 PM

Uhm... 28GB are roughly 44 hours of non-stop CD-quality audio. I find that hard to believe.


Yes and CD audio is stereo, meaning only two channels.

This audio is 7.1 uncompressed and I believe >44khz ( God knows why ). That is many times larger than CD audio

#14 Vortez   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2698

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:30 PM

Glad to see im not the only one who think this is insane.



#15 Alessio1989   Members   -  Reputation: 1997

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:32 PM

Laziness of the PC porting team, nothing more, nothing less...


Edited by Alessio1989, 12 March 2014 - 02:33 PM.

"Software does not run in a magical fairy aether powered by the fevered dreams of CS PhDs"


#16 Vortez   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2698

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:34 PM


It's interesting. I know our game's (Angry Birds Go!) load times at boot are because of sound decompression. I think it's nice that they've considered lower spec PCs, but these days dual-core PCs are rare amongst gamers. If anyone was serious about gaming I'd imagine they'd have upgraded to at least quad a long time ago.

 

So true.

 


Yes, if that's the reason its asinine. Decoding a few ogg or mp3 files isn't going to be that big a burden on the CPU. And even if it were, there's no reason it couldn't be done during loading.

A much more likely reason, methinks, is that the Xbox One has co-processors which can stream and route data without CPU intervention, and also has co-processors to decompress popular compressed formats including, for sure, JPEG and LZW, and probably mp3 as well. My guess would be that the Xbox One version of the software takes advantage of this to stream compressed audio directly to the mixer, decompressing it at the same time, and that they didn't take the time to really change how this works to be more suitable for the PC -- it sounds like the did the minimum work of creating a kind of shim to do the streaming, and that the PC, of course, doesn't have hardware to decompress it. That would mean they couldn't decompress the audio during loading screens, because its too built into the game, and I suppose if they would be decompressing a lot of audio streams, and their min-spec processor represented significantly-higher potential install base by keeping it just that much lower, then you could make a business case for such a decision -- but it really is just laziness that they didn't consider PC audio from the ground up to begin with.

 

What about sound cards? Aren't they hardware to decode sound? (Edit: Thinking about it, It's true that they don't do the decoding part in hardware tho)

 

Plus, i have an old dual core athlon 5000+, and listening to mp3 while playing a game dosn't matter at all, that take like 2-3% of my cpu max...


Edited by Vortez, 12 March 2014 - 02:38 PM.


#17 Madhed   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2906

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:37 PM


This audio is 7.1 uncompressed and I believe >44khz ( God knows why ). That is many times larger than CD audio

 

I don't see 7.1 mentioned in the article. Aren't those surround effects calculated in the 3d sound engine from mono samples?

Also anything higher than 44khz doesn't really make any sense unless you are doing some extreme pitch bending.



#18 Vortez   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2698

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:42 PM

 


This audio is 7.1 uncompressed and I believe >44khz ( God knows why ). That is many times larger than CD audio

 

I don't see 7.1 mentioned in the article. Aren't those surround effects calculated in the 3d sound engine from mono samples?

Also anything higher than 44khz doesn't really make any sense unless you are doing some extreme pitch bending.

 

 

Are you sure? I though cd audio quality was 44.1 khz



#19 Madhed   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 2906

Posted 12 March 2014 - 02:44 PM


Are you sure? I though cd audio quality was 44.1 khz

 

My bad. 44.1khz tongue.png



#20 Serapth   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 5456

Posted 12 March 2014 - 03:18 PM

This audio is 7.1 uncompressed and I believe >44khz ( God knows why ). That is many times larger than CD audio

 
I don't see 7.1 mentioned in the article. Aren't those surround effects calculated in the 3d sound engine from mono samples?
Also anything higher than 44khz doesn't really make any sense unless you are doing some extreme pitch bending.

It was a different article. That said, the game is DTS HD ( says so on the box :) ), which is up to 7.1 channels as well as 96khz. Why it's 96khz when that's wayyyy past what a human can distinguish... Beats me.

Not that it excuses anything, but it does explain the size. If it's uncompressed it's most like PCM, which means encoding size ( 2 bytes for 44khz ) times encoding rate ( 44000 ) times number of channels ( 7 ) per second of audio!




Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS