Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

How was GTA3 made in such a short time?


Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.


  • You cannot reply to this topic
11 replies to this topic

#1   Members   -  Reputation: 686

Posted 11 July 2014 - 10:58 AM

Just played through it again. Now there are a lot of assets, three sections of a city and pretty detailed, although low texture and polygon quality.

 

So....they licensed the Renderware engine and apparently modified it pretty heavily. That was about in 1999 and the game was released in 2002. As far as I can see they had a team of about 15-20 people overall, they used to be DMA design and were bought over by Rockstar. It seems a mammoth task though creating all the assets/gameplay/levels/coding/scripting in such a small time. What was their secret?



#2   Members   -  Reputation: 510

Posted 11 July 2014 - 12:45 PM

they had massive, massive whips



#3   Moderators   -  Reputation: 12189

Posted 11 July 2014 - 01:03 PM

Take it as a lesson in what a competent, high quality, focused team can do with a clear vision and minimal executive meddling.


SlimDX | Shark Eaters for iOS | Ventspace Blog | Twitter | Proud supporter of diversity and inclusiveness in game development

#4   Members   -  Reputation: 5377

Posted 11 July 2014 - 02:06 PM

I haven't played the game in forever, but I'm guessing they heavily re-used assets, that and it's PS2, so low textures, low poly models, etc.  That kind of artist count in that era wasn't all that uncommon.



#5   Moderators   -  Reputation: 20987

Posted 11 July 2014 - 03:18 PM

Wait. Three years is a short time to develop a game?



Wat.
Wielder of the Sacred Wands
[Work - ArenaNet] [Epoch Language] [Scribblings]

#6   Moderators   -  Reputation: 48898

Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:24 PM

For some perspective, most console games I've worked on have had a budget for about 8-12 months of development with a small team... 3-4 years would be wonderful!

#7   Crossbones+   -  Reputation: 8693

Posted 11 July 2014 - 08:00 PM

they had massive, massive whips
Yeah, you hear all but nice stories from Rockstar. Then again, lots of studios, dunno how it was in GTA 3 era.

 

I do know it was and it is a damn fine game. It blew minds all around to go from GTA 2 to GTA 3. Props to them for it.


"I AM ZE EMPRAH OPENGL 3.3 THE CORE, I DEMAND FROM THEE ZE SHADERZ AND MATRIXEZ"

 

My journals: dustArtemis ECS framework and Making a Terrain Generator


#8   Members   -  Reputation: 1759

Posted 11 July 2014 - 09:30 PM

When a team is considered big? 50+?

 

I got super impressed when I read that book w/ lots of post mortens (postmortems from gamedeveloper), and the team of the original age of empires was like 25 ppl if I remember correctly..Id expect it to be made by 70+ ¦D



#9   Members   -  Reputation: 462

Posted 17 July 2014 - 02:03 PM

Just played through it again. Now there are a lot of assets, three sections of a city and pretty detailed, although low texture and polygon quality.

 

So....they licensed the Renderware engine and apparently modified it pretty heavily. That was about in 1999 and the game was released in 2002. As far as I can see they had a team of about 15-20 people overall, they used to be DMA design and were bought over by Rockstar. It seems a mammoth task though creating all the assets/gameplay/levels/coding/scripting in such a small time. What was their secret?

 

I don't see that much of a challenge. It's all about finding the right workflow, in particularly having good concept artists and skilled mappers / modellers. Actually Rockstar Games stated in an interview, that they have perfected their workflow to such a degree that they could release a new map of the size of GTA V's by every year. Not sure if they count in research though; half of Los Santos' buildings are "inspired" from real buildings in L.A..


Edited by Dr. Penguin, 17 July 2014 - 02:10 PM.


#10   Moderators   -  Reputation: 14861

Posted 17 July 2014 - 02:12 PM


Wait. Three years is a short time to develop a game?

 

A large sandbox game, you mean? Sure, why not.


-- Tom Sloper
Sloperama Productions
Making games fun and getting them done.
www.sloperama.com

Please do not PM me. My email address is easy to find, but note that I do not give private advice.

#11   Members   -  Reputation: 1064

Posted 18 July 2014 - 10:34 AM

I haven't played the game in forever, but I'm guessing they heavily re-used assets, that and it's PS2, so low textures, low poly models, etc.  That kind of artist count in that era wasn't all that uncommon.

 

Are low-poly models and low-res textures easier to make? Don't artists generally create super-high detail versions and optimise down to real-time-usable versions?



#12   Moderators   -  Reputation: 12189

Posted 18 July 2014 - 10:36 AM

 

I haven't played the game in forever, but I'm guessing they heavily re-used assets, that and it's PS2, so low textures, low poly models, etc.  That kind of artist count in that era wasn't all that uncommon.

 

Are low-poly models and low-res textures easier to make? Don't artists generally create super-high detail versions and optimise down to real-time-usable versions?

 

Probably not in the timeframe and technology that was used to build GTA 3.

 

It's worth noting that GTA 3 was built on top of Criterion RenderWare at the time.


Edited by Promit, 18 July 2014 - 10:38 AM.

SlimDX | Shark Eaters for iOS | Ventspace Blog | Twitter | Proud supporter of diversity and inclusiveness in game development




Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.




PARTNERS