I'm trying to debug an issue I'm having with regards to skeletal animation exporting from Maya and importing into my engine - C++ with OpenGL ES 2.0 and GLSL

I export the geometry along with bind pose matrices from an exporter in Maya along with bone/weight information in World Space. I'm able to see that this data gets imported correctly into my engine.

Maya

http://imgur.com/E21PYkv

My Engine
http://imgur.com/yUL3D3D

As you can see, the base pose transforms are correctly exported. As is the geometry.

Next, I export the Animation Data in World Space from Maya. I'm able to draw the animated skeleton and have verified this as correct. Furthermore, I've written a custom shader that draws bone indices and weights directly on the mesh - this, too, I've verified as correct.

Where things are going wrong is when I pass along the transformation matrix to my vertex shader to displace the vertex positions and normals. My calculations are as follows -

worldToBindPose - transform from world origin to Bind Pose

worldToAnimation - transform from world origin to Animation Pose

finalTransform - the array of mat4 transforms passed to the vertex shader

So for each bone in the animation, I perform this calculation (Bind => World => Animation)

finalTransform = worldToAnimation * inverse(worldToBindPose);

and then in the vertex shader

vec4 tpos = vec4(pos, 1.0);

vec4 new_position =

((animation[int(bones.x)] * tpos) * weights.x) +

((animation[int(bones.y)] * tpos) * weights.y) +

((animation[int(bones.z)] * tpos) * weights.z) +

((animation[int(bones.w)] * tpos) * weights.w);

return projection * modelview * new_position.xyz;

And we get this:

http://imgur.com/62xGGVx

The previous image sums up the result - the orange-red line is the bind pose, the purple line is the animated skeleton transforms. As you can see, the geometry should be fit to the purple line, but it's off. Similar animations display the same result - it looks kind of correct - it's almost as if my matrices aren't concatenating properly. I've looked at similar code samples, and even a previous exporter I had written years ago for 3D Studio Max, and my math is darn near identical.

I'm totally stuck, although I think I've narrowed it down to the line

finalTransform = worldToAnimation * inverse(worldToBindPose);

Any ideas?

I throw an error in the Maya exporter if a vertex has a non-normalized weight - so that'd be something I'd catch.

Vertices are in world space, as are all transforms. (World to Bind Pose, World to Animation) - I export quaternions for rotation and vector3 for translation, although I did an experiment with exporting raw matrices and turning interpolation off, although this yielded roughly the same result.

What is of particular interest is I'm able to draw the animated skeleton transforms by transforming vec3(0,0,0) by the current animation transform, then drawing them out manually, and that looks correct.

I am also exporting the mesh in the bind position.

It still looked incorrect. But if your vertices are in the bind pose, wouldn't you want to concatenate using the invBindPose? You're right - you're transforming the vertices from the bind pose to bone space by multiplying the influence verts by the weighted inverse bind transformations, then transforming them using the animation transform (non-inverted). Sorry if my terminology isn't 100% correct.

What I'm having trouble grasping is the fact that I am able to draw the skeleton accurately, ie for each bone, I start with a vector at 0,0,0 and then multiply it against that bone's interpolated position, and it looks 1-1 to Maya. Ditto for the bind pose transformations. The only issue I see is the skinned mesh isn't lining up 1-1 with the skeleton.

I've attached a .mov file that illustrates the problem.

Also should point out that I've implemented both GPU and CPU animation, and I get the same result from both.

I've also verified my matrix inverse function is correct (to the best of my knowledge) by taking a sampling of 4x4 matrices, inverting them, and multiplying against the original,to which I get the identity for each one - weird.