Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

We're offering banner ads on our site from just $5!

1. Details HERE. 2. GDNet+ Subscriptions HERE. 3. Ad upload HERE.


Specular Highlights with Directional Lightmaps


Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
1 reply to this topic

#1 TheFieryScythe   Members   -  Reputation: 150

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 12 August 2014 - 06:00 AM

Hi, i've been adding directional lightmaps to an old DX9 engine, which is working fine, but i wanted to have a go at adding specular highlights for static lighting. I've heard that other engines such as Unity and UE3 have this but my google-fu is failing me as I can't find any solid implementation details. So, i've had a blind stab at it myself but there's a divide by zero issue blocking me at the moment.
 
The theory is that the directional lightmaps have an approximation of the light hitting a surface, so rather than getting the diffuse light by using the surface normal directly (with normal map) I get the reflected light by using the reflected eye vector. I then use the luminance of the reflected light as it's attenuation, on which the specular exponent and coefficient is applied before multiplying the reflected light to get the final specular value.
 
This doesn't seem to work too badly, even if it is totally innacurate and bodged together tongue.png.
 
Diffuse light
Diffuse.png
 
Specular Light
Specular.png
 
Specular attenuated
SpecularAttenuated.png
 
Baseline (No directional lightmaps)
StandardDiffuse.png
 
Final Diffuse
DirectionalDiffuse.png
 
Final Diffuse + Specular
Combined.png
 
Code:

static const float3 BumpBasis[3] =
{
	float3(	sqrt(2.0) / sqrt(3.0),				0.0,	1.0 / sqrt(3.0)),
	float3(	-1.0 / sqrt(6.0),		1.0 / sqrt(2.0),	1.0 / sqrt(3.0)),
	float3(	-1.0 / sqrt(6.0),		-1.0 / sqrt(2.0),	1.0 / sqrt(3.0))
};

float3 CalculateDLMContribution(float3 TangentNormal)
{
	TangentNormal.y = -TangentNormal.y;
	
	float3 lightmapContribution = 0;
	lightmapContribution.x = dot(BumpBasis[0], TangentNormal);
	lightmapContribution.y = dot(BumpBasis[1], TangentNormal);
	lightmapContribution.z = dot(BumpBasis[2], TangentNormal);
	lightmapContribution = saturate(lightmapContribution);
	lightmapContribution *= lightmapContribution;
	
	return lightmapContribution;
}
	
float3 CalculateDLMDiff(float3 TangentNormal,
	float3 DLightmap0,
	float3 DLightmap1,
	float3 DLightmap2)
{
	float3 lightmapContribution = CalculateDLMContribution(TangentNormal);

	float3 light = 0;
	
	float sum = dot(lightmapContribution, float3(1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f));
	light += DLightmap0 * lightmapContribution.x;
	light += DLightmap1 * lightmapContribution.y;
	light += DLightmap2 * lightmapContribution.z;
	light /= sum;
	
	return light;
}
	
float3 CalculateDLMSpec(float3 TangentNormal,
	float3 EyeVectorTS,
	float3 DLightmap0,
	float3 DLightmap1,
	float3 DLightmap2)
{		
	float3 reflectedEye = -reflect(normalize(EyeVectorTS), TangentNormal);	
	float3 lightmapContribution = CalculateDLMContribution(reflectedEye);
		
	float3 light = 0;	
	
	light += DLightmap0 * lightmapContribution.x;
	light += DLightmap1 * lightmapContribution.y;
	light += DLightmap2 * lightmapContribution.z;
	light /= 1.33f; // Arbitrary value :(
	
	float luminance = dot(light, float3(0.30f, 0.59f, 0.11f));
	
	luminance = pow(luminance, 6.0f) * 7.0f; // Hardcoded test values
	
	return saturate(light * luminance);
}
 
However, the issue I mentioned is with the light averaging that occurs in the diffuse light calculation. I'd expect to have to do the same in the specular light calculation but if I do I end up with a divide by zero since the reflected vector can point below the surface normal resulting in zero light contributions from any of the 3 basis directions. This causes a harsh black spot in the resulting specular light, and i'm not sure how to counter it.
 
Black Spots
BlackSpots.png
 
Highlighted
Highlighted.png
 
At the moment i'm dividing by an arbitrary value to get a reasonable result but i'm hoping there's a *proper* way to handle this?


Sponsor:

#2 God__Man   Members   -  Reputation: 121

Like
0Likes
Like

Posted 16 August 2014 - 06:16 PM

I tried emailing you on your issues but I never recieved a reply. I've been working on a directional lightmapping shader also. Reply back a method of contact that you actually check or currently use.






Old topic!
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.



PARTNERS