Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account


Member Since 01 Jul 2007
Offline Last Active Mar 27 2012 03:30 PM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Questions about collision detection

15 March 2012 - 06:12 PM

3D collision detection is fairly complicated. 3D collision response (fixing the collision after detected) is very complicated. Doing interesting physics with these events (from bouncing balls to complex constraint-based physics) is insanely complex.

There are a number of books on the topic. There are also Open Source libraries to learn from, such as Bullet.

If you're looking to use physics without digging into the details and writing it all from scratch yourself, you are far better off using an existing physics library. Bullet is quite serviceable. There are others. If the game is a free/hobby project, I believe you can even use Havok or PhysX freely.

In Topic: Sending thousands of uniforms to a shader. (3.2 -4.0)

15 March 2012 - 05:43 PM

Texture buffer objects exist specifically to solve this problem. They're pretty straight forward to use and easy to look up on the OpenGL wiki.

In Topic: Bounding Box Calculations

10 March 2012 - 06:00 PM

To transform an AABB the simple way, there's only a few simple steps. First of course generate the untransformed AABB from the model's untransformed vertices by calculating the max/min values for each axis. Then, for any transformation matrix you wish to apply to the model, you will apply that matrix to the eight corners of the AABB, and find the new max/min values for each axis.

If you have more constrained transformations you can simplify this somewhat. Constraining rotations can do a lot.

If you represent your AABBs as a point and a vector of half lengths, you only need to do 2 matrix multiplications instead of 8, but remember that you still need to decompose the half length vector and calculate a new one after transformation.

In Topic: 2D OpenGL ES wrapper with emulation on Windows?

10 March 2012 - 05:49 PM

SDL or SFML probably do what you want. There are a ton of 2D rendering libraries that can use GL/D3D, but that all have various caveats.

Note that "blitting" over modern graphics APIs is not necessarily what you want to be doing. You're much better off with a simple scene graph that can probably batch draw calls and offer an automatic texture atlas.

Old-style 2D rendering is simply not the right way to get proper use of modern graphics hardware, and in some cases it's just faster to do that kind of rendering completely on the CPU.

In Topic: What is the best solution for 3d animation in games ?

10 March 2012 - 02:22 PM

In terms of best use of time, an existing engine is the way to go. For someone who finds C++ to be a little overwhelming or requiring too much boilerplate, I would recommend trying Unity, which is a very popular AAA level game engine that uses C# (as one option) for coding custom game logic (Unity's core is all in C++, of course).

Note that I do not believe that a programmer can simply take an engine like that and make the most efficient use of it. If you don't understand how to code 3D animations in C++ yourself then that strongly indicates that you just don't understand 3D animations, and you need to understand them at a decent level to be able to use them in any effective, interesting ways.

If you're looking to teach students about game programming, premade engines are not the way to go. Again because a game programmer has to understand the core techniques of an engine to use an engine effectively. Students will be best served by building their own simple engines. Yes, it's a lot of work, but it's worth it. Otherwise you'll be educating the game industry equivalent of script kiddies: a bunch of young clueless people who know how to use a specific tool but are utterly lost as soon as they need to do something new, different, or innovative.

Specifically regarding 3D animations, there's not a lot to it. Students should have prior knowledge of GPU shader programming (D3D or GL, doesn't matter which) and a solid understanding of linear algebra (particularly vector spaces, changes of basis, and the usual 3D affine transformations). A primary on quaternions can be useful but given in the same class that animations are taught. With those foundations, writing a complete animation and rendering system is not that difficult at all. It's practically trivial, really, if you start out with key-framed skeletal animations and build up from there.