Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Banner advertising on our site currently available from just $5!

1. Learn about the promo. 2. Sign up for GDNet+. 3. Set up your advert!


Member Since 28 Dec 2008
Offline Last Active Jun 29 2014 02:48 AM

Posts I've Made

In Topic: multiple windows/instances and gl::GL_MAX_DRAW_BUFFERS

06 February 2013 - 11:18 AM

i do call wglMakeCurrent, but the thing is: i don't call it in each thread, since i only run 1 thread. I do run both window computations and draw methods one after the other. (both windows don't need a lot of computations so this works for me i'd like to keep it simple)


imagine my loop is like:

instance1 = new inst... // an instance containing it's scene logic, window, and opengl context
instance2 = new inst...

    instance1->update()->draw(); // calls makecurrent does it's stuff and renders


could the problem be that i run multiple contexts on the same thread?




problem solved


a background worker thread had some old not cleaned up messy code that switched the context in some cases at uncontrolled times...

In Topic: problems with position and depth range in fbo texture

23 July 2012 - 11:31 AM

thanks that helped a lot, i've set mine to 0.35 / 1000 at the moment, and in case i need to see farther i might render in a different clipping context.

one question remains, which is why my postions texture looks so weird. is that normal? because it doesn't look anything like the gdebugger output.

In Topic: problems with position and depth range in fbo texture

23 July 2012 - 06:09 AM

i tried repositioning my camera and setting the projection near/far from 0.1/100000 to 10/10000, and now i see the depth texture, and the positions.

still they do not look like they do in gdebugger, but seeing those values, i think it is just a matter of displaying the values sent to the shader differently.

here is my engine output
Posted Image

and this is what gdebugger says:
Posted Image

how can i change my shader or render calls to visualize the textures in a better color range?

because needing to have the far/near plane at 10/10000 is not accepable if i have a first person camera running on that land/heightmap. i'd at least like them to be 0.3/3000

In Topic: multiple shaders per model

22 March 2012 - 05:25 PM

ah very interesting. i had also thought about seperating meshes from models once but i took the convenient (and slow) route and set the buffer pointers on each mesh draw call. but with your way i can bind a buffer for a model of a kind once and then render it on different positions with different parameters.

this brings me to another question:

when you have your meshes sorted in a list, if we say for example 3 meshes share the same buffers and are drawn one after the other, but for some reason one of those wants to use a different shader. what would you prioritise?

- would you rather group meshes with the same buffer first, and then with those meshes sort those with the same shaders and change shaders more often
- or group shaders, and then within shaders group meshes which share buffers?

thanks is advance, your answer was very very helpful

In Topic: out of memory!

14 February 2011 - 05:21 AM

no_pixel is around 29,5XX, it represents a counter of pixels within a specific area of an img,

do you mean 29-thousend?, in this case you try allocating roughly 800MB of memory.

becase you create a byte[30000][30000] in this case. Is this really what you want?