 Home
 » Viewing Profile: Posts: kumpaka
kumpaka
Member Since 05 Mar 2012Offline Last Active Apr 22 2012 08:07 AM
Community Stats
 Group Members
 Active Posts 14
 Profile Views 1,211
 Submitted Links 0
 Member Title Member
 Age Age Unknown
 Birthday Birthday Unknown

Gender
Not Telling
100
Learning
User Tools
Latest Visitors
Posts I've Made
In Topic: Quaternions
30 March 2012  12:53 PM
Ok then i got this sorted, ty very much for your help.
In Topic: Quaternions
30 March 2012  11:49 AM
This is making me confused, i tought and it made sense. I was happy i got this out of the way, but now i found this here: http://content.gpwiki.org/index.php/OpenGL:Tutorials:Using_Quaternions_to_represent_rotation#Rotating_vectors
They actually normalize the vector they are about to rotate:
They actually normalize the vector they are about to rotate:
// Multiplying a quaternion q with a vector v applies the qrotation to v Vector3 Quaternion::operator* (const Vector3 &vec) const { Vector3 vn(vec); vn.normalise(); Quaternion vecQuat, resQuat; vecQuat.x = vn.x; vecQuat.y = vn.y; vecQuat.z = vn.z; vecQuat.w = 0.0f; resQuat = vecQuat * getConjugate(); resQuat = *this * resQuat; return (Vector3(resQuat.x, resQuat.y, resQuat.z)); }
In Topic: Quaternions
30 March 2012  10:52 AM
I see, that was very helpful indeed thank you.
What about the vector i want to rotate? on v' = q . v . conj(q), does 'v' also need to be normalized? Because if it does, wont it alter the result intended?
Very sorry if this sound like dumb questions, just started looking at quaternions a few days ago =( You're help is much appreciated.
What about the vector i want to rotate? on v' = q . v . conj(q), does 'v' also need to be normalized? Because if it does, wont it alter the result intended?
Very sorry if this sound like dumb questions, just started looking at quaternions a few days ago =( You're help is much appreciated.
In Topic: Quaternions
29 March 2012  07:20 PM
Its solved, the math i had on paper was right but not the one on code =( both problems were solved, my vector dot product and vector cross product had mistakes. Thank you.
PS: If the vector i want to rotate does not have lenght 1, i need to normalize it? Rotation quaternions, if calculated by that formula are always unit quaternions?
PS: If the vector i want to rotate does not have lenght 1, i need to normalize it? Rotation quaternions, if calculated by that formula are always unit quaternions?
In Topic: Quaternions
29 March 2012  02:20 PM
I started to prove that today on paper(yeah by scalar i meant real part, on book im reading he calls it scalar, on some toturials it's the 'w') and thats what i got, it should be zero i was just afraid i did the math wrong. The examples i try on my code dont end up getting 0 on the real part, means im doing something wrong... need to find out what and correct it, just wanted to be sure i was on the right path.
Btw, you say for quaternions that represent rotations q = 1, i calculated it, for example with this:
alpha = 90º
v = (1.0,0.0,0.0)
q = [cos(90/2), sin(90/2) * (v)]
But it did not result in a normalized quaternion, again the math on my code must be working improperly right?
Thank you.
PS(before calculating the cos or sin, i convert de degree's to radians)
Btw, you say for quaternions that represent rotations q = 1, i calculated it, for example with this:
alpha = 90º
v = (1.0,0.0,0.0)
q = [cos(90/2), sin(90/2) * (v)]
But it did not result in a normalized quaternion, again the math on my code must be working improperly right?
Thank you.
PS(before calculating the cos or sin, i convert de degree's to radians)